Gender-Specific Preferences Regarding Urban Green Areas

Bąkowska-Waldmann, Edyta; Piniarski, Witold

Gender-Specific Preferences Regarding Urban Green Areas

Quaestiones Geographicae

Volume 42 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)

By:

Edyta Bąkowska-Waldmann

and Witold Piniarski

Open Access

|Dec 2023

References

Alexandri E., Jones P., 2008. Temperature decreases in an urban canyon due to green walls and green roofs in diverse climates. Building and Environment 43(4): 480–493. DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.055.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ambrey C.L., Fleming C.M., 2014. Public greenspace and life satisfaction in urban Australia. Urban Studies 51(6): 1290–1321. DOI 10.1177/0042098013494417.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Annerstedt M., Östergren P.O., Björk J., Grahn P., Skärbäck E., Währborg P., 2012. Green qualities in the neighbourhood and mental health – results from a longitudinal cohort study in Southern Sweden. BMC Public Health 12: 337. DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-337.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Astell-Burt T., Mitchell R., Hartig T., 2014. The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 68: 578. DOI 10.1136/jech-2013-203767.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Balai Kerishnan P., Maruthaveeran S., 2021. Factors contributing to the usage of pocket parks – A review of the evidence. Urban for Urban Greening 58: 126985. DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126985.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bektas A., Schumann R., 2019. How to optimize gower distance weights for the k-Medoids clustering algorithm to obtain mobility profiles of the Swiss population. In: 6th Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS) 51–56. DOI 10.1109/SDS.2019.000-8.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Belčáková I., Slámová M., Demovičová Z., 2022. Importance of urban green areas in the context of current and future global changes: Lessons learned from a case study in Bratislava (Slovakia). Sustainability 14(22): 14740. DOI 10.3390/su142214740.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Biernacka M., Kronenberg J., 2019. Urban green space availability, accessibility and attractiveness, and the delivery of ecosystem services. Cities and the Environment (CATE) 12(1): 5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowler D.E., Buyung-Ali L., Knight T.M., Pullin A.S., 2010. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning 97(3): 147–155. DOI 10.1016/j.landurb-plan.2010.05.006.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bratman G.N., Hamilton J.P., Daily G.C., 2012. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249: 118–136. DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown G., Kyttä M., 2014. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography 46: 122–136. DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buijs A., Mattijssen T.J.M., Van der Jagt A.P.N., Ambrose-Oji B., Andersson E., Elands B.H.M., Steen Møller M., 2016. Active citizenship for urban green infra-structure: Fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22: 1–6. DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.002.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carpio-Pinedo J., de Gregorio Hurtado S., de Madariaga I.S., 2019. Gender mainstreaming in urban planning: The potential of geographic information systems and open data sources. Planning Theory and Pratice 20(2): 221–240. DOI 10.1080/14649357.2019.1598567.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Caula S., Hvenegaard G.T., Marty P., 2009. The influence of bird information, attitudes, and demographics on public preferences toward urban green spaces: The case of Montpellier, France. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8: 117–128. DOI 10.1080/14649357.2019.1598567.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cerin E., Vandelanotte C., Leslie E., Merom D., 2008. Recreational facilities and leisure-time physical activity: An analysis of moderators and self-efficacy as a mediator. Health Psychology 27(2), Suppl: 126–135. DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen K., Zhang T., Liu F., Zhang Y., Song Y., 2021. How does urban green space impact residents’ mental health: A literature review of mediators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(22): 11746. DOI 10.3390/ijerph182211746.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chidambaram B., Scheiner J., 2021. Work-trip mode choice in Germany – Affected by individual constraints or by partner interaction? Travel Bahaviour and Society 24: 231–244. DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.007.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark P. J., Evans F. C., 1954. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445–453.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Codina N., Pestana J.V., 2019. Time matters differently in leisure experience for men and women: Leisure dedication and time perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(14): 2513. DOI 10.3390/ijerph16142513.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohen D.A., McKenzie T.L., Sehgal A., Williamson S., Golinelli D., Lurie N., 2007. Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health 97: 509–514. DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Council of Europe, 1998. Gender mainstreaming: Conceptual framework, methodology and presentation of good practices. Online: https://www.unhcr.org/3c160b06a.pdf (accessed 16 January 2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Craig W.J., Harris T.M., Weiner D., 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. Taylor & Francis, London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Czarnecki D., Skalski D.W., Kreft P., Kaszowska M., Nikolenko O., 2023. Aktywność fizyczna kobiet i mężczyzn w czasie wolnym od pracy (Physical activity of women and men in the time off work). Rehabilitation and Recreation 14: 151–157. DOI 10.32782/2522-1795.2023.14.17.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Vries S., Verheij R.A., Groenewegen P.P., Spreeuwenberg P., 2003. Natural environments – healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A 35: 1717–1731. DOI 10.1068/a35111.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
dos Santos T.R.L., Zárate L.E., 2012. GCA: An algorithm based on the gower similarity for clustering of categorical variables. XXXVIII Conferencia Latinoamericana En Informatica (CLEI), 1–6. DOI 10.1109/CLEI.2012.6427180.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dubicki P., Kułyk P., 2018. Proces integracji miasta z gminą miejską. Przykład Zielonej Góry (The process of urban– rural integration. Using the example of Zielona Góra). Studia Miejskie 32: 113–124. DOI 10.25167/sm2018.032.08.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ettema D., Friman M., Gärling T., Olsson L.E., 2016. Mobility, sociability and well-being of urban living. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg: 129–150. DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-48184-4_7.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Europe Institute for Gender Equality, 2023. Gender Statistics Database. Online: https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs/browse/wmidm/wmidm_pol/wmidm_pol_gov (accessed 12 April 2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Evensen K. H., Hemsett G., Nord H., 2021. Developing a place-sensitive tool for park-safety management experiences from green-space managers and female park users in Oslo. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 60: 127057. DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127057.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fok K.W.K., Law W.W.Y., 2018. City re-imagined: Multi-stakeholder study on branding Hong Kong as a city of greenery. Journal of Environmental Management 206: 1039–1051. DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.045.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frändberg L., Vilhelmson B., 2011. More or less travel: Personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. Journal of Transport Geography 19(6): 1235–1244. DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.06.004.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Galindo M.P.G., Corraliza J.A., 2000. Environmental aesthetics and psychological wellbeing: Relationships between preference judgements for urban landscapes and other relevant affective responses. Psychology in Spain 4: 13–27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goel R., Oyebode O., Foley L., Tatah L., Millett Ch., Woodcock J., 2023. Gender differences in active travel in major cities across the world. Transportation 50: 733–749. DOI 10.1007/s11116-021-10259-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gower J.C., 1967. A comparison of some methods of cluster analysis. Biometrics 23(4): 623–637. DOI 10.2307/2528417.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gower J.C., 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857–874. DOI 10.2307/2528823.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gryl I., Jekel T., Donert K., 2010. Geoinformation and spatial citizenship. Eearning with Geoinformation V: 2–11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guzman L.A., Arellana J., Oviedo D., Moncada Aristizábal C.A., 2021. COVID-19, activity and mobility patterns in Bogota. Are we ready for a ‘15-minute city’? Travel Behaviour and Society 24: 245–256. DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haklay M., Singleton A., Parker C., 2008. Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the geoweb. Geography Compass 2(6): 2011–2039.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography (GUGiK), 2022. Państwowy Rejestr Granic – jednostki administracyjne 2022 (State Register of Borders administrative units 2022). Online: https://opendata.geoportal.gov.pl/prg/granice_archiwalne/PRG_jednostki_administracyjne_2022.zip (accessed 31 January 2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henning S., Vogler R., Gryl I., 2013. Spatial education for different user groups as a prerequisite for creating a spatially enabled society and leveraging SDI. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 8: 98–127.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jakubiec D., Kornafel D., Cygan A., Górska-Kłęk L., Chromik K., 2015. Lifestyle of students from different universities in Wrocław, Poland. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny (Yearbooks of the National Institute of Hygiene) 66(4): 337–344.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jorgensen A., Hitchmough J., Calvert T., 2002. Woodland spaces and edges: Their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape Urban Planning 60(3): 135–50. DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00052-X.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaczmarek T., Kołodziejczak A.K., Mikuła Ł., 2022. Transformation of the urban and rural system. In: Churski P., Kaczmarek T. (eds), Three decades of Polish socio-economic transformations: Geographical perspectives. Cham, Springer International Publishing: 279–304. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-06108-0_12.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaczynski A.T., Potwarka L.R., Smale B.J.A., Havitz M.E., 2009. Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: Variations by gender and age. Leisure Sciences 31: 174–191. DOI 10.1080/01490400802686045.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaplan R., 2001. The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior 33: 507–542. DOI 10.1177/00139160121973115.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P.J., 1987. Clustering by means of medoids. In: Dodge Y. (ed.), Statistical Data Analysis Based on the L1-norm and Related Methods. North-Holland: 405–416.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P. J., 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaźmierczak A., 2013. The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning 109: 31–44. DOI 10.1177/00139160121973115.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kronenberg J., Łaszkiewicz E., Sziło J., 2021. Voting with one’s chainsaw: What happens when people are given the opportunity to freely remove urban trees? Landscape and Urban Planning 209: 104041. DOI 10.1016/j.landurb-plan.2021.104041.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lachowycz K., Jones A.P., 2013. Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: Development of a theoretical framework. Landscape and Urban Planning 118: 62–69. DOI 10.1016/j.lan-durbplan.2012.10.012.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Labus A., 2015. Strategie równości płci w kontekście zrównoważonego planowania przestrzeni publicznych (Gender mainstreaming strategy in the context of sustainable planning of public spaces). In: Klasik A., Kuźnik F. (eds), Rozwój obszarów miejskich w polityce regionów (Development of urban areas in regional policy). Studia Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN 164. Polish Academy of Sciences PAN, Warsaw: 362–382.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee A.C.K., Maheswaran R., 2010. The health benefits of urban green spaces: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health 33(2): 212–222. DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdq068.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Legutko-Kobus P., Nowak M., Petrisor A., Bărbulescu D., Craciun C., Gârjoabă A., 2023. Protection of environmental and natural values of urban areas against investment pressure: A case study of Romania and Poland. Land 12(1): 245. DOI 10.3390/land12010245.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maas J., Spreeuwenberg P., van Winsum-Westra M., Verheij R.A., Vries S., Groenewegen P.P., 2009. Is green space in the living environment associated with people’s feelings of social safety? Environmental Planning 41: 1763–1777. DOI 10.1068/a4196.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mabelis A.A., Maksymiuk G., 2009. Public participation in green urban policy: Two strategies compared. International Journal of Biodiversity Science & Management 5(2): 63–75. DOI 10.1080/17451590902978251.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacKerron G., Mourato S., 2013. Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environtal Changes 23: 9921000. DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Magrinyà F., Mercadé-Aloy J., Ruiz-Apilánez B., 2023. Merging green and active transportation infrastructure towards an equitable accessibility to green areas: Barcelona green axes. Land 12: 919. DOI 10.3390/land12040919.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mahrous A.M., Mustafa Y.M., Abou El-Ela M.A., 2018. Physical characteristics and perceived security in urban parks: Investigation in the Egyptian context. Ain Shams Engeneeiring Journal 9(4): 3055–66. DOI 10.1016/j.asej.2021.04.016.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mattingly M.J., Bianchi S.M., 2003. Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience. Social Forces 81(3): 999–1030.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ministry of Family and Social Policy, 2019. Urlopy dla rodziców w 2019 (Parental leave in 2019). Online: https://www.gov.pl/web/rodzina/urlopy-dla-rodzicow-w-2019-najnowsze-dane (accessed 12 April 2023)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miralles-Guasch C., Melo M.M., Marquet O., 2015. A gender analysis of everyday mobility in urban and rural territories: From challenges to sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture 23(3): 398–417. DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2015.1013448.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nosal-Hoy K., 2018. Czynnik płci w zachowaniach komunikacyjnych (The gender factor in communication behaviours). Transport Miejski i Regionalny 5: 5–11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ode A., Fry G., Tveit M.S., Messager P., Miller D., 2009. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 375–383. DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OpenStreetMap Contributors, 2023. OpenStreetMap Data. Online: https://planet.openstreetmap.org (accessed 31 January 2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Polko P., Kimic P., 2022. Gender as a factor differentiating the perceptions of safety in urban parks. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 13: 101608. DOI 10.1016/j.asej.2021.09.032.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reynolds A.P., Richards G., Rayward-Smith V.J., 2004. The application of K-Medoids and PAM to the clustering of rules. In: Yang Z.R., Yin H., Everson R.M. (eds), Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-28651-6_25.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rousseeuw P.J., 1987. Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20: 53–65. DOI 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rubiano-Matulevich E.C., Viollaz M., 2019. Gender differences in time use: Allocating time between the market and the household. Policy Research working paper, WPS 8981, World Bank Group. Online: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/555711565793045322/Gender-Differences-in-Time-Use-Allocating-Time-between-the-Market-and-the-Household (accessed 5 April 2023)
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanesi G., Charello F., 2006. Residents and urban green spaces: The case of Bari. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4(3-4): 125–134. DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.12.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sang A.O., Knez I., Gunnarsson B., Hedblom M., 2016. The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 18(1): 268–276. DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Santos T., Mendes R.N., Vasco A., 2016. Recreational activities in urban parks: Spatial interactions among users. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 15: 1–9. DOI 10.1016/j.jort.2016.06.001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sánchez M.I.O., González E.M., 2016. Gender differences in commuting behavior: Women’s greater sensitivity. Transportation Research Procedia 18: 66–72. DOI 10.1016/j. trpro.2016.12.009.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scheiner J., Holz-Rau C., 2017. Women’s complex daily lives: A gendered look at trip chaining and activity pattern entropy in Germany. Transportation 44: 117–138. DOI 10.1007/s11116-015-9627-9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schindler M., Le Texier M., Caruso G., 2022. How far do people travel to use urban green space? A comparison of three European cities. Applied Geography 141: 102673. DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102673.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schipperijn J., Ekholm O., Stigsdotter U.K., Toftager M., Bentsen P., Kamper-Jørgensen F., Randrup T.B., 2010. Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Eandscape and Urban Planning 95: 130–137. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seresinhe C.I., Preis T., MacKerron G., Moat H.S., 2019. Happiness is greater in more scenic locations. Scientific Reports 9(1): 1–11. DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-40854-6.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shahapure K.R., Nicholas C., 2020. Cluster Quality Analysis Using Silhouette Score. In 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Sydney, NSW, Australia: 747–748. DOI 10.1109/DSAA49011.2020.00096.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sieber R., 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96(3): 491–507. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sonti N.F., Campbell L.K., Svedsen E.S., Johnson M.L., Auyeung D.S., 2020. Fear and fascination: Use and perceptions of New York City’s forests, wetlands, and landscaped park areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 49: 126601. DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126601.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Statistics Poland, n.d. Local Data Bank. Online: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/bdl/start (accessed 16 January 2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Struyf A., Hubert M., Rousseeuw P.J., 1997. Integrating robust clustering techniques in S-PLUS. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 26: 17–37. DOI 10.1016/S0167-9473(97)00020-0.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sullivan W.C., Kuo F.E., Depooter S.F., 2004. The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and Behavior 36: 678–700. DOI 10.1177/0193841X04264945.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Supreme Audit Office (Najwyższa Izba Kontroli), 2022. Zachowanie i zwiększanie terenów zielonych w miastach. LLU.410.003.03.2021 Nr ewid. 172/2021/P/21/074/LLU. https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,25648,vp,28421.pdf (accessed 3 April 2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sutton R.M., Farrall S., 2004. Gender, socially desirable responding and the fear of crime: Are women really more anxious about crime? The British Journal of Criminology 45(2): 212–24. DOI 10.1093/bjc/azh084.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Suwada K., 2021. Parenting and work in Poland: A gender studies perspective. Springer Nature, Switzerland: 107.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tang J., Li S., 2022. Can public participation promote regional green innovation?—Threshold effect of environmental regulation analysis. Heliyon 8: 11157.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tiwari A., Kumar P., Kalaiarasan G., Ottosen T., 2021. The impacts of existing and hypothetical green infrastructure scenarios on urban heat island formation. Environmental Pollution 274: 115898. DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115898.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tyrväinen L., Mäkinen K., Schipperijn J., 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1): 5–19. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
United Nations, 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Online: https://sdgs.un-.org/2030agenda (accessed 16 January 2023).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van den Berg A.E., Jorgensen A., Wilson E.R., 2014. Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning 127: 173–181. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van den Berg A.E., Koole S.L., Van Der Wulp N.Y., 2003. Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 135–146. DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van der Maaten L., Hinton G., 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9: 2579–2605.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang D., Brown G., Liu Y., Mateo-Babiano I., 2015. A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use. Cities 42: 85–96. DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wang R., Helbich M., Yao Y., Zhang J., Liu P., Yuan Y., Liu Y., 2019. Urban greenery and mental wellbeing in adults: Cross-sectional mediation analyses on multiple pathways across different greenery measures. Environmental Research 176: 108535. DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108535.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ward Thompson C., Roe J., Aspinall P., Mitchell R., Clo A., Miller D., 2012. More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning 105: 221–229. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williams T., Logan T.M., Zuo C.T., Liberman K.D., Guikema S., 2020. Parks and safety: A comparative study of green space access and inequity in five US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 201: 103841. DOI 10.1016/j.landurb-plan.2020.103841.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolch J.R., Byrne J., Newell J.P., 2014. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 234–244. DOI 10.1016/j.landurb-plan.2014.01.017.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wood L., Hooper P., Foster S., Bull F., 2017. Public green spaces and positive mental health – investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health & Place 48: 63–71. DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.002.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wójcicki M., 2018. Formy i zakres partycypacji społecznej w procesie planowania przestrzennego w Poznaniu (Forms and scopes of public participation in spatial planning in Poznań city). Biblioteka Aglomeracji Poznańskiej 31, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu J., Xu Z., Jin Y., Chai Y., Newell J., Ta N., 2022. Gender disparities in exposure to green space: An empirical study of suburban Beijing. Landscape and Urban Planning 222: 104381. DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104381.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wu W., Dong G., Sun Y., Yun Y., 2020. Contextualized effects of park access and usage on residential satisfaction: A spatial approach. Land Use Policy 94: 104532. DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104532.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0037 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 23 - 41

Submitted on: Jan 24, 2023

Published on: Dec 20, 2023

Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 times per year

Keywords:

urban green areas,

spatial planning,

public participation,

gender mainstreaming,

geographic information systems

Related subjects:

Geosciences,

Geography

© 2023 Edyta Bąkowska-Waldmann, Witold Piniarski, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous article Volume 42 (2023): Issue 4 (December 2023)Next article