
Fig. 1.
The area under study (C) in relation to the country (A) and the Lubuskie region (B).
Source: authors’ own elaboration.
Reference data: OpenStreetMap contributors (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright), Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography, Poland (GUGiK).

Fig. 2.
An exemplary geo-questionnaire page used in the study.
Source: author’s own elaboration.
Table 1.
The characteristics of the sample.
| Variable | N | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender* |
|
| ||
| W | M | W | M | |
| Age |
|
|
|
|
| Education |
|
|
|
|
| Mobility (means of transport used to access greenery – unlimited number of choices per respondent) |
|
|
|
|

Fig. 3.
The most often visited green areas in Zielona Góra among men (A) and women (B). Numbers on maps refer to the place’s IDs in Table 2.
Source: authors’ own elaboration.
Reference data: OpenStreetMap contributors (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright).
Table 2.
Differences in visited green areas indicated by men and women.
| Place ID | No. of indications | Men [%] | Women [%] | Characteristics of the area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 100.0 | 0.0 | Forest cultivation located north of Northern Route (Trasa Północna) |
| 2 | 5 | 100.0 | 0.0 | Forest cultivation located east of express road S3 |
| 3 | 3 | 0.00 | 100.0 | Part of Gęśnik valley with recreational facility |
| 4 | 3 | 0.00 | 100.0 | Park Mazurski (Mazuria Park) – semi-naturally maintained urban green area with recreational facilities |
| 5 | 6 | 16.7 | 83.3 | Women Rights Square – maintained urban green area with recreational facilities |
| 6 | 5 | 20.0 | 80.0 | Green areas in multi-family housing area |
| 7 | 15 | 80.0 | 20.0 | Las Nadodrzański (Odra Forest) – natural green area, forest and oxbow lake of Oder River |
| 8 | 18 | 77.8 | 22.2 | Pustelnik stream located in natural green area |

Fig. 4.
Displacement vectors from the respondents’ homes to selected green areas (A - men, B - women).
Source: authors’ own elaboration.
Reference data: OpenStreetMap contributors (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright).

Fig. 5.
Scatter plot of the designated clusters.
Source: authors’ own elaboration.
Table 3.
Statistical characteristics of the designated clusters of transport preferences.
| Cluster | Gender | Descriptive statistics | Mean range/ Average distance [km] | Transport preferences Each value is independent and varies individually for each means of transport from 0.00 to 1.00 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women [no.] | Men [no.] | On foot | Bicycle | Car | Bus | |||
| 1 | 11 | 53 | Min. | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1st Qu. | 1.42 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Median | 2.79 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Mean | 3.24 | 0.06 | 0.92 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |||
| 3rd Qu. | 4.65 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Max. | 9.26 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.33 | |||
| 2 | 0 | 84 | Min. | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1st Qu. | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Median | 1.41 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Mean | 1.91 | 0.73 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.09 | |||
| 3rd Qu. | 2.27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Max. | 12.71 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.00 | |||
| 3 | 80 | 0 | Min. | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1st Qu. | 0.63 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Median | 1.12 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Mean | 1.63 | 0.62 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.05 | |||
| 3rd Qu. | 2.38 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.00 | |||
| Max. | 8.92 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| 4 | 5 | 28 | Min. | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 1st Qu. | 2.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.00 | |||
| Median | 4.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Mean | 4.87 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 0.90 | 0.02 | |||
| 3rd Qu. | 7.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Max. | 9.35 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 0.50 | |||
Table 4.
Points indicated per respondent regarding proposed green areas.
| Average number of indicated points per respondent* | Total number of indicated points | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Men | Women | |
| Green parking lot | 0.46 | 0.39 | 76 | 37 |
| Green playground | 0.72 | 1.38 | 118 | 132 |
| Green roof/wall | 0.55 | 0.82 | 91 | 79 |
| Green square | 0.48 | 0.64 | 79 | 61 |
| Park | 0.87 | 0.85 | 143 | 82 |
| Pocket park | 0.39 | 0.58 | 64 | 56 |
| Rain garden | 0.34 | 0.79 | 56 | 76 |
| Retention pond | 0.33 | 0.18 | 55 | 17 |

Fig. 6.
Proposed locations of new green areas in Zielona Góra: A – men, B – women.
Source: authors’ own elaboration.
Reference data: OpenStreetMap contributors (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright).
Geo-questionnaire questions
| Dimension | Questions |
|---|---|
| Characteristics of respondent |
|
| Visited urban green areas |
|
| Preferred new urban green areas |
|