Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Watershed Prioritisation of Drainage Basins Based on Geomorphometric Parameters, Neyyar Watershed, India Cover

Watershed Prioritisation of Drainage Basins Based on Geomorphometric Parameters, Neyyar Watershed, India

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Agarwal C.S., 1998. Study of drainage pattern through aerial data in Naugarh area of Varanasi district, U.P. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 26: 169–175.
  2. Ahmed S.A., Chandrashekarappa K.N., Raj S.K., Nischitha V., Kavitha G., 2010. Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM—a study on Bandihole sub watershed basin in Karnataka. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 38(2): 227–238.
  3. Arefn R., Mohir M.M.I., Alam J., 2020. Watershed prioritization for soil and water conservation aspect using GIS and remote sensing: PCA-based approach at north-ern elevated tract Bangladesh. Applied Water Science 10: 91. DOI 10.1007/s13201-020-1176-5.
  4. Ayele A.F., Hiroshi Y., Katsuyuki Sh., Nigussie H., Kifle W., 2017. Quantitative analysis and implications of drainage morphometry of the Agula watershed in the semi-arid northern Ethiopia. Applied Water Science 7: 3825–3840.
  5. Ayele G.T., Kuriqi A., Jemberrie M.A., Saia S.M., Seka A.M., Teshale E.Z., Daba M.H., Ahmad Bhat S., Demissie S.S., Jeong J., Melesse A.M., 2021. Sediment yield and reservoir sedimentation in highly dynamic watersheds: The case of Koga Reservoir, Ethiopia. Water 13(23): 3374. DOI 10.3390/w13233374.
  6. Bhattacharya R.K., Das-Chatterjee D.N.D., Das K., 2020. Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models. Science of the Total Environment 73: 139474. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139474.
  7. Bogale A., 2021. Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using geographical information system in Gilgel Abay watershed, Lake Tana basin, upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Applied Water Science 11: 122. DOI 10.1007/s13201-021-01447-9.
  8. Clarke J.I., 1996. Morphometry from maps. Essays in geomorphology. Elsevier, New York: 235–274.
  9. Dar R.A., Chandra R., Romshoo S.A., 2013. Morphotectonic and lithostratigraphic analysis of intermontane Karewa basin of Kashmir Himalayas, India. Journal of Mountain Science 10(1): 731–741.
  10. Desta L., Carucci V., Wendem-Ageňehu A., Abebe Y., 2005. Community based participatory watershed development: A guideline. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Addis Ababa.
  11. Ditthakit P., Pinthong S., Salaeh N., Binnui F., Khwanchum L., Kuriqi A., Khedher K.M., Pham Q.B., 2021. Performance evaluation of a two-parameters monthly rainfall runoff model in the southern basin of Thailand. Water 13(9): 1226. DOI 10.3390/w13091226.
  12. Esin A.I., Akgul M., Akay A.O., Yurtseven H., 2021. Comparison of LiDAR-based morphometric analysis of a drainage basin with results obtained from UAV, TOPO, ASTER and SRTM-based DEMs. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14: 340. DOI 10.1007/s12517-021-06705-3.
  13. ESRI [Environmental Systems Research Institute], 2021. Sentinel-2 10-Meter Land Use/Land Cover. Online: livingatlas.arcgis.com/landcover/ (accessed 1 February 2021).
  14. Faniran A., 1968. The index of drainage intensity: A provisional new drainage factor. Australian Journal of Science 31(9): 326–330.
  15. FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization], 1988. Soil Map of the World. Revised legend with corrections and updates world soil resource food and agricultural organization, FAO, Rome, Italy, Report 60.
  16. Farhan Y., Elgaziri A., Elmaji I., Ali I., 2016. Hypsometric analysis of Wadi Mujib Wala watershed (Southern Jordan) using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International Journal of Geosciences 7: 158–176. DOI 10.4236/ijg.2016.72013.
  17. Gajbhiye S.M., Sharma S.K., 2017. Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: A PCA-based approach. Applied Water Science 7: 1505–1519.
  18. Garg S.K., 1983. Geology—the science of the earth. Khanna Publishers, New Delhi.
  19. Horton R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydro physical approach to quantitative morphology. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 56: 275-370.
  20. Hurtrez J.E., Sol C., Lucazeau F., 1999. Effect of drainage area on hypsometry from analysis of small-scale drainage basins in the Siwalik Hills (Central Nepal). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24: 799–808. DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199908)24:9<799::AID-ESP12>3.0.CO;2-4.
  21. Imran M.M., Sultan M.B., Kuchay A.N., 2011. Watershed based drainage morphometric analysis of Lidder watershed in Kashmir valley using geographical information system. Recent Research in Science Technology 3(4): 118–126.
  22. Jain M.K., Das D., 2010. Estimation of sediment yield and areas of soil erosion and deposition for watershed prioritization using GIS and remote sensing. Water Resources Management 24: 2091–2112. DOI 10.1007/s11269-009-9540-0.
  23. Javed A., Khanday M.Y., Ahmed R., 2009. Prioritization of sub watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 37: 261–274.
  24. Karra K., Kontgis C., Statman-Weil Z., Mazzariello J.C., Mathis M., Brumby S.P., 2021. Global land use/land cover with Sentinel 2 and deep learning. In: IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium IGARSS: 4704–4707. DOI 10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553499.
  25. Keller E.A., Pinter N., 1996. Active Tectonics, Earthquake Uplift and Landscape. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  26. Khurana D., Rawat S.S., Raina G., Sharma R., Jose P.G., 2020. GIS-based morphometric analysis and prioritization of upper Ravi watershed, Himachal Pradesh. Springer, Singapore. DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-8181-2_13.
  27. Kudnar N.S., Rajasekhar M., 2020. A study of the morphometric analysis and cycle of erosion in Waingangā Basin, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 6: 311–327. DOI 10.1007/s40808-019-00680-1.
  28. Kushwaha N.L., Elbeltagi A., Mehan S., Malik A., Yousuf A., 2022. Comparative study on morphometric analysis and RUSLE-based approaches for micro-watershed prioritization using remote sensing and GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 15: 564. DOI 10.1007/s12517-022-09837-2.
  29. Langbein W.B., 1947. Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. USGS Water Supply Paper, 947-C: 157.
  30. López-Pérez A., Fernández-Reynoso D.S., 2021. Watershed prioritization using morphometric analysis and vegetation index: A case study of Huehuetan river sub-basin. Mexico Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14: 1852. DOI 10.1007/s12517-021-08212-x.
  31. Magalhaes S.F.C.D., Barboza C.A.D.M., Maia M.B., Molisani M.M., 2022. Influence of land cover, watershed morphometry and rainfall on water quality and material transport of headwaters and low order streams of as tropical mountainous watershed. Catena 213: 106137.
  32. Manjare B.S., Khan S., Jawadand S.A., Padhye M.A., 2018. Watershed prioritization of Wardha river basin, Maharashtra, India using morphometric parameters: A remote sensing and GIS-based approach. Springer, Singapore: 353–366.
  33. Mathew A., Sarwesh P., Khandelwal S., 2022. Investigating the contrast diurnal relationship of land surface temperatures with various surface parameters represent vegetation, soil, water, and urbanization over Ahmedabad city in India. Energy Nexus 5: 100044.
  34. Mathew A., Shekar P.R., 2023. Flood prioritization of basins based on geomorphometric properties using morphometric analysis and principal component analysis: A case study of the Maner river basin. River dynamics and flood hazards. disaster resilience and green growth. Springer, Singapore. DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-7100-6_18.
  35. Melton M., 1957. An analysis of the relations among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology. Project NR 389 - 042, technical report 11, Columbia University, Technical Report, 11, Project NR 389-042.
  36. Meshram S.G., Alvandi E., Meshram Ch., Kahya E., Al-Quraishi A.M.F., 2020. Application of SAW and TOPSIS in prioritizing watersheds. Water Resources Management 34: 715–732. DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02470-x.
  37. Meshram S.G., Alvandi E., Singh V.P., Meshram C., 2019. Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for prioritization of watersheds. Soft Computing 23: 13615–13625. DOI 10.1007/s00500-019-03900-z.
  38. Meshram S.G., Sharma1 S.K., 2017. Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: A PCA-based approach. Applied Water Science 7: 1505–1519. DOI 10.1007/s13201-015-0332-9.
  39. Miller VC., 1953. A quantitative geomorphologic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Technical report 3, Columbia University, New York: 389–402.
  40. Monteiro L.D.S., Oliveira-Júnior J.F.D., Ghaffar B., Tariq A., Qin S., Mumtaz F., Filho W.L.F.C., Shah M., Jardim A.M.D.R.F., da-Silva M.V., Santiago D.D.B., Barros H.G., Mendes D., Abreu M.C., de-Souza A., Pimentel L.C.G., da-Silva J.L.B., Aslam M., Kuriqi A., 2022. Rainfall in the urban area and its impact on climatology and population growth. Atmosphere 13(10): 1610. DOI 10.3390/atmos13101610.
  41. Nookaratnam K., Srivastava Y.K., Rao V.V., Amminedu E., Murthy K.S.R., 2005. Check dam positioning by prioritization micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis - remote sensing and GIS perspective. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 33: 25–38. DOI 10.1007/BF02989988.
  42. Obi R.G.E., Maji A.K., Gajbhiye K.S., 2002. GIS for morphometric analysis of drainage basins. GIS India 4(11): 9–14.
  43. Pike R.J., Wilson S.E., 1971. Elevation-relief ratio hypsometric integral and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin 82: 1079–1084.
  44. Poongodi R., Venkateswaran S., 2018. Prioritization of the micro-watersheds through morphometric analysis in the Vasishta sub basin of the Vellar river, Tamil Nadu using ASTER digital elevation model (DEM) data. Data in Brief 20: 1353–1359. DOI 10.1016/J.DIB.2018.08.197.
  45. Praus P., 2005. Water quality assessment using SVD-based principal component analysis of hydrological data. Water SA 31(4): 417–422.
  46. Rahmati O., Samadi M., Shahabi H., Azareh A., Rafiei-Sardooi E., Alilou H., 2019. SWPT: An automated GIS-based tool for prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and topo hydrological factors. Geoscience Frontiers 10: 2167–2175. DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.03.009.
  47. Rao N.K., Swarna L.P., Kumar A.P., Krishna H.M., 2010. Morphometric analysis of Gostani river basin in Andhra Pradesh State, Indian using spatial information technology. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 1(2): 179–187.
  48. Redvan G., Mustafa U., 2021. Flood prioritization of basin based on geomorphometric properties using principal component analysis, morphometric analysis and redvan’spriority methods: A case study of Harshit river basin. Journal of Hydrology. 603, 127061. DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127061.
  49. Ritter D.F., Kochel R.C., Miller J.R., 2002. Process geomorphology. McGraw Hill, Boston.
  50. Roy S.S., 2002. Hypsometry and landform evolution: A case study in the banas drainage basin, Rajasthan, with implications for Aravalli uplift. Journal of Geological Society of India 60: 7–26.
  51. Sangma F., Guru B., 2020. Watersheds characteristics and prioritization using morphometric parameters and fuzzy analytical hierarchal process (FAHP): A part of lower Subansiri sub-basin. Journal of Indian Society Remote Sensing 48: 473–496. DOI 10.1007/s12524-019-01091-6.
  52. Sarkar P., Kumar P., Vishwakarma D.K., Ashok A., Elbeltagi A., Gupta S., Kuriqi A., 2022. Watershed prioritization using morphometric analysis by MCDM approaches. Ecological Informatics 101763(70): 1574–9541. DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101763.
  53. Sarp G., Toprak V., Duzgun S., 2011. Hypsometric properties of the hydraulic basins located on western part of Nafz. In: 34th International symposium on remote sensing of environment theme: Water a limited and degraded resource, Sydney, Australia, 10–15 April 2011.
  54. Schumm S.A., 1956. Evaluation of drainage system and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin 67(5): 597–646.
  55. Shekar P.R., Mathew A., 2022a. Morphometric analysis for prioritizing sub-watersheds of Murredu River basin, Telangana State, India, using a geographical information system. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science 69: 44. DOI 10.1186/s44147-022-00094-4.
  56. Shekar P.R., Mathew A., 2022b. Evaluation of morphometric and hypsometric analysis of the Bagh river basin using remote sensing and geographic information system techniques. Energy Nexus 7: 100104. DOI 10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100104.
  57. Shekar P.R., Mathew A., 2022c. Prioritising sub-watersheds using morphometric analysis,principal component analysis, and land use/land cover analysis in the Kinnerasani river basin, India. H2Open Journal 5(3): 490–514. DOI 10.2166/h2oj.2022.017.
  58. Shekar P.R., Mathew A., 2023. Erosion susceptibility mapping based on hypsometric analysis using remote sensing and geographical information system techniques. River dynamics and flood hazards. Disaster resilience and green growth. Springer, Singapore. DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-7100-6_26.
  59. Shrestha S., Kazama F., 2007. Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environmental Modelling and Software 22: 464–475.
  60. Singh W.R., Barman S., Trikey G., 2021. Morphometric Analysis and watershed prioritization in relation to soil erosion in Dudhnai watershed. Applied Water Science. 11: 151. DOI 10.1007/s13201-021-01483-5.
  61. Strahler A.N., 1952a. Hypsometric (Area-Altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geological Society of America Bulletin 63: 1117–1141. DOI 10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2.
  62. Strahler A.N., 1952b. Quantitative geomorphology of erosional landscapes. In: 19th international geologic congress, sec 13, Algiers: 3, 342–354.
  63. Strahler A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology in drainage basin morphometry. Benchmark papers in geology 41, Schumn H.S. (ed.), Transactions, American Geophysical Union 38(6): 913–920.
  64. Strahler A.N., 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In: Chow V. (ed), Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill, New York: 439–476.
  65. USGS [United States Geological Survey], 2021. Digital elevation model (DEM) SRTM. Online: earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed 1 February 2021).
  66. Vishwakarma D.K., Ali R., Bhat S.A., Elbeltagi A., Kushwaha N.L., Kumar R., Rajput J., Heddam S., Kuriqi A., 2022. Pre- and post-dam river water temperature alteration prediction using advanced machine learning models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29: 83321–83346. DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-21596-x.
  67. Vivoni E.R., Benedetto F.D., Grimaldi S., Eltahir E.A.B., 2008. Hypsometric control on surface and subsurface run-of. Water Resources Research 44: W12502. DOI 10.1029/2008WR006931.
  68. Vivoni E.R., Benedetto F.D., Grimaldi S., Eltahir E.A.B., 2008. Hypsometric control on surface and subsurface run-off. Water Resources Research 44: W12502. DOI 10.1029/2008W R006931.
  69. Waiyasusri K., Chotpantarat S., 2020. Watershed prioritization of kaeng lawa sub-watershed, khon kaen province using the morphometric and land-use analysis: A case study of heavy flooding caused by tropical storm podul. Water (Switzerland) 12: 1570. DOI 10.3390/W12061570.
  70. Weissel J., Pratson L., Malinverno A., 1994. The length-scaling properties of topography. Journal of Geophysical Research 30: 151–159. DOI 10.1029/94jb00130.
  71. Willgoose G., Hancock G., 1998. Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport-limited watersheds. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23: 611–623.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 47
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2022
Accepted on: Mar 22, 2023
Published on: Jun 27, 2023
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2023 Padala Raja Shekar, Aneesh Mathew, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.