Table 1
Revitalisation documents analysed.
| City | Name of revitalisation programme | Legal basis | Date of last amendment | Programming range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toruń | Local Revitalisation Programme of the City of Toruń for the years 2007–2015 (LRP Toruń) | Resolution No. 624/09 of the City Council of Toruń of 29 August 2009 | Nov 13, 2014 | 2007–2015 |
| Toruń | Toruń Revitalisation Programme until 2023 (RP Toruń) | Resolution No. 922/18 of the City Council of Toruń of 6 September 2018 | Feb 2, 2020 | 2016–2023 |
| Bydgoszcz | Local Revitalisation Programme of the City of Bydgoszcz for the years 2007–2015 (LRP Bydgoszcz) | Resolution No. XLIX/728/09 of the City Council of Bydgoszcz of 24 June 2009 | Sept 23, 2015 | 2007–2015 |
| Bydgoszcz | Communal Revitalisation Programme of the City of Bydgoszcz for 2023 and thereafter (CRP Bydgoszcz) | Resolution No. IV/12/18 of the City Council of Bydgoszcz of 28 November 2018 | – | 2016–2023 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Fig. 1
Spatial scope of the study – Revitalisation areas of Toruń and Bydgoszcz.
Source: own elaboration.
Table 2
Description of the revitalisation programmes according to the evaluation criteria.
| Revitalisation programme | Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects (%) | Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas (%) | Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local Revitalisation Programme of the City of Toruń for the years 2007–2015 | 6 | PLN 3,150.71 | 64.86 | 100 | 10 |
| Communal Revitalisation Programme of Toruń until 2023 | 5 | PLN 2,121.05 | 43.08 | 100 | 4 |
| Local Revitalisation Programme of the City of Bydgoszcz for the years 2007–2015 (LRP Bydgoszcz) | 10 | PLN 2,266.81 | 50.00 | 100 | 5 |
| Communal Revitalisation Programme of the City of Bydgoszcz for 2023 and thereafter (CRP Bydgoszcz) | 5 | PLN 6,079.47 | 69.84 | 100 | 5 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table 3
Pairwise comparison matrix of evaluation criteria.
| Indicator | Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | 1 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 1 |
| Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | 1/5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1/5 |
| Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | 1/7 | 1/4 | 1 | 1/4 | 1/8 |
| Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | 1/4 | 1/3 | 4 | 1 | 1/4 |
| Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process | 1 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 2.59 | 11.58 | 24.00 | 12.25 | 2.58 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table 4
Normalised matrix values and weighting of the evaluation criteria.
| Indicator | Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.36 |
| Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
| Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.37 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table 5
Eigenvectors of the matrix for the evaluation criteria.
| Criterion | Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvector of matrix | 5.56 | 5.44 | 5.14 | 5.01 | 5.54 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table 6
Input data matrix for the final matrix.
| Revitalisation programme | Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toruń 2007–2015 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.58 |
| Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.25 | 0.09 |
| Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.66 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.16 |
| Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.09 | 0.64 | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.16 |
| WEIGHT criterion | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.37 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table 7
Ranking of revitalisation programmes.
| Rank | Programme | Value |
|---|---|---|
| I | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 0.37 |
| II | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.32 |
| III | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.21 |
| IV | RP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.10 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A1
Pairwise comparison – Criterion 1.
| Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0.14 | 2.00 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 1.00 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 1.00 |
| Total | 9.00 | 10.00 | 1.48 | 10.00 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A2
Normalised matrix values and criterion weight 1.
| Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.15 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.09 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.78 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.60 | 0.66 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.09 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A3
Eigenvector of the matrix – Criterion 1.
| Number of indicators used to delimit revitalisation area | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvector of matrix | 4.05 | 4.03 | 4.27 | 4.03 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A4
Pairwise comparison – Criterion 2.
| Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 0.17 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0.14 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.13 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 6.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 7.45 | 12.50 | 16.00 | 1.43 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A5
Normalised matrix values and criterion weight 2.
| Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.22 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.05 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.64 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A6
Eigenvector of the matrix – Criterion 2.
| Project value per one inhabitant of revitalisation area | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvector of matrix | 4.24 | 4.02 | 4.08 | 4.67 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A7
Pairwise comparison – Criterion 3.
| Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 0.50 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.20 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.33 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 0.17 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 3.58 | 13.00 | 10.33 | 1.87 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A8
Normalised matrix values and criterion weight 3.
| Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.51 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A9
Eigenvector of the matrix – Criterion 3.
| Share of projects submitted by non-municipal entities in total number of submitted revitalisation projects | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvector of matrix | 4.23 | 4.03 | 4.11 | 4.29 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A10
Pairwise comparison – Criterion 4.
| Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A11
Normalised matrix values and criterion weight 4.
| Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A12
Eigenvector of the matrix – Criterion 4.
| Number of monitored areas in relation to total number of areas | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvector of matrix | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A13
Pairwise comparison – Criterion 5.
| Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.25 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.25 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Total | 1.70 | 10.00 | 6.50 | 6.50 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.
Table A14
Normalised matrix values and criterion weight 5.
| Number of indicators used to monitor revitalisation process | LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRP Toruń 2007–2015 | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.58 |
| CRP Toruń 2016–2023 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| LRP Bydgoszcz 2007–2015 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| CRP Bydgoszcz 2016–2023 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.16 |
[i] Source: own elaboration.