Successful Technology Commercialization – Yes or No? Improving the Odds. The Quick Look Methodology and Process

Zehner, Brad; Pletcher, Gary

doi:10.14611/minib.25.09.2017.13

Abstract

This article explores the relationships which transform new scientific knowledge into new commercial products, services, and ventures to create wealth creation. The major technology and marketing commercialization dilemmas are defined and addressed. The Quicklook methodology and related processes to quickly assess the commercial viability and potential of a scientific research project is explained. Using the Quicklook methodology and process early in the research and development process improves the success odds of commercialization.

References

1. Ayres, A. (August 2016). Quotable Edison. New York: Quotable Books/Fall River Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Bloom, J. (2016). Eccentric Orbits: The Iridium Story. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Cornwell, B. (1998). Quicklook Commercialization Assessments. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Enterprise-Asia Pacific, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7-9.10.5172/impp.1998.1.1.7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. De Geus, A. (1996). The Living Company - Habits for Survival in a Turbulent Business Environment. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, p. 2-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Hansen, P. (August 1995). Publically produced knowledge for business: When is it effective? Technovation, Vol. 15, 6, 387-397.10.1016/0166-4972(95)96599-O
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Jakobs, E., Spinuzzi, C., Digmayer, C. & Pogue, G. (2015). Co-creation by commenting: Participatory ways to write Quicklook Reports. In Proceedings of IEEE professional communication society - International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 291-297), Limerick, Ireland. Retrieved 31 January 2017, from https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/3127610.1109/IPCC.2015.7235823
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Jolly, V. (1997). Commercializing New Technologies - Getting from Mind to Market. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, p. 19
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Maltby, A., Zehner, W., & Difford, R. (2006). Quick Mark Market Assessment and Business Opportunity Validation Methodology - a major boon for innovative SMEs? An evaluation ofthe effectiveness of quick cut market assessment tool for small businesses. Academy of Marketing Conference, London, England, June 4 to June 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Moriarty, R. & Kosnik, T. (October 14, 1987). High Tech vs. Low Tech Marketing: Where's the Beef? Harvard Business School Note 9-588-12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Solow, R. (August 1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics - MIT Press, 39, pp. 312-320.10.2307/1926047
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Stevens, G.A. & Burley, J. (May-June 1997). 3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success! Research Technology Management, Vol. 40 #3.10.1080/08956308.1997.11671126
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Wilson, R. & Marcus, S. (1999). American Greats. New York: Public Affairs, p. 70.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. World Development Indicators. The World Bank Data Base. Retrieved 7 January 2017, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Zehner, W., Williams, C., and Pletcher, G. (2016). Technology Creates 21st Century Wealth - Processes, Problems, and Prognosis. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, no. 2 (20), pp. 17-38.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Successful Technology Commercialization – Yes or No? Improving the Odds. The Quick Look Methodology and Process

Abstract

Paradigm

My account