References
- 1. Pabian, A. (2007). Reklama nowych technologii na rynkach przemysłowych. W: T. Markowski, D. Trzmielak i J. Sosnowski (eds.). Marketing Technologiczny i marketing terytorialny, Polska Akademia Nauk Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju, Biuletyn, Zeszyt 235, 292-300.
- 2. Agrawal, A. (2001). University-to-indusrty knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285-302.
- 3. Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processs, 50, 179-211.
- 4. Baker, T.L., Simpson, P.M., and Siguaw, J.A. (1999). The Impact of Suppliers Perceptions on Reseller Market Orientation on Key Relationship Constructs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 50-57.
- 5. Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In: Vasta, R. (eds.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1-60.
- 6. Berry, L.L., Relationship Marketing in Emerging Perspectives on Services Marketing, Berry, L.L., Shostack, G.L. and Upah, G.D. (eds.), Chicago: American Marketing Association: 25-28.
- 7. Caloghirou, Y., Tsakanikas, A., Vonortas, N.S. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 153-161.
- 8. Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32, 887-908.
- 9. Lendner, Ch. (2007). University technology transfer through university business incubators and how they help start-ups. In: F. Thérin, E. Elgar, (eds.). Handbook of Research on Techno-Entrepreneurship, 163-169
- 10. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, (1), 1-23.
- 11. Crosby, L.A. Building and maintaining Quality in the Service Relationship. In: S.W. Brown, and E. Gummesson, (eds), Service Quality: Multidisciplinary and Multinational Perspectives. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 269-287.
- 12. Lange, D., Belinko, K. and Kalligatsi, K. (2000). Building successful technology commercialization teams: pilot empirical support for the theory of cascading commitment, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 25, 169-180.
- 13. D’Este, P. and Patel, P. University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36 (9), 1295-1313.
- 14. Dooley, L. and Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration. Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, 316-332.
- 15. Dorsch, M.J., Swanson, S.R., and Kelley, S.W. (1998). The role of Relationship Quality in the Stratification of Vendors as Perceived by Customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 128-42.
- 16. Fei, Li, et al. (2015). How to manage the industry-university collaborative relationship to improve the innovation performance. Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2015 Portland International Conference on. IEEE.
- 17. Foss, L. and Gibson, D. (2015). The entrepreneurial university. Context and institutional change. Routledge, NY .
- 18. Garbarino, E., Johnson, M.S. (1999). The Different Roles of Satisfaction, trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63, 70-87.
- 19. Grönroos, Ch. (1997). From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing - Towards a Paradigm Shift in Marketing. Management Decision, 35, 322-339.
- 20. Grzegorczyk, M., Trzmielak, D. (2015). Knowledge Transfer and Technology Commercialization - comparative study in: Building Sustainable R&D Centers in Emerging Technology Regions, ed. David Gibson, Jan Slovak, Masaryk University, 61-74.
- 21. Gummesson, E. (2002). Total Relationship Marketing. Rethinking Marketing Management: From 4Ps to 30Rs. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
- 22. Gwinner, K.P., Gremler, D.D. and Bitner, M.J. (1998). Relational Benefits in Services Industries: The Customer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 101-114.
- 23. Hall, B.H. University-industry partnerships in the United States. In: Contzen, J.P., Gibson, D. and heitor, M.V. (eds), Rethinking Science Systems and Innovation Policies. Proceedings og the 6th international Conference on technology Policy and Innovation. Ashland, OH: Purde University Press.
- 24. Hastings, G., Donovan, R.J. (2002). International initiatives: Introduction and overview. Social Marketing Quarterly, 8, 2-4.
- 25. Hennig-Thurau, T. (2000). Relationship Quality and Customer Retention through Strategic Communication of Customer Skills. Journal of Marketing Management, 16, 55-79.
- 26. Hoedemaekers, R. (2001). Commercialization, patents and moral assessment of biotechnology products. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 3, ss. 273-284.
- 27. Mohr, J. (2001). Marketing of High-technology products and innovations, Prentice Hall.
- 28. Jaffe, A.B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review. 79.5, 957-970.
- 29. Kozmetzky, G., Williams, F. andWilliams, V. (2004). New Wealth. Commercialization of Science and Technology for Business and Economic Development. Praeger, s. 4.
- 30. van den Berge, L. and Guild, P.D. (1986). Firm perceptions of competitive advantage of new university technology and their impact on exclusivity of licensing transactions. Inter- national Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2007, Vol. 4, No. 4, ss. 479-494, according to: R.N. Foster, Innovation: The Attacker’s advantage. Summit Books, New York.
- 31. Lee, Y.S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaborations: and empirical assesment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111-133.
- 32. Maibach, E.W. and Cotton, D. (1995). Moving people to behaviour change: a staged social cognitive approach to message design. In: Maibach, E. and Parrott, R. (eds). Designing Health Messages. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- 33. Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 55-65.
- 34. McMillan, G.S. and Hamilton, R.D. (2003). The impact of publicly funded basic research: an integrative extension of martin and Salter. IEEE transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 184-191.
- 35. Mischel, W. (1971). Introduction to Personality. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York.
- 36. Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (eds.) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry technology before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- 37. Palmer, A., Bejou, D. (1994). Buyer-Seller relationships: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Marketing Management, 10, 495-512.
- 38. Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259-280.
- 39. Plewa, C., Quester, P. and Baaken, T. Relationship marketing and university - industry linkages: conceptual framework. Marketing Theory, 5 (2005), 433-456.
- 40. Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., Macpherson, G., Baaken, T. and Rampersad, G.C. (2013). The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30, 21-44.
- 41. Reichheld, F., and Sasser, W.E. (1990). Zero defections: Quality Comes to Services. Harvard Business Review, 68, 105-11.
- 42. Reynolds, K.E., Sharon, E.B. (1999a). Customer benefits and Company Consequences of Customer Salesperson relationships in Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 75, 11-32.
- 43. Salter, A.J. and Martin, B.R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, 30, 509-532.
- 44. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C. Fischer, M.M. and Frohlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303-328.
- 45. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. and Link, A.N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
- 46. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. Atwater, L. and Link, A.N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142.
- 47. Smith, J.B. (1998). Buyer-Seller relationships: Similarity, relationship management, and Quality. Psychology and Marketing, 15, 3-21.
- 48. Sung, T.K., Gibson, D. (2005), Knowledge and technology transfer grid: empirical assessment. International Hournal of technology Management, 29, 216-230
- 49. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 3, 203-222.
- 50. Trzmielak, D. and Grzegorczyk, M. (2010). Technology marketing - the use of relationship marketing principles in the process of international commercialization. In: Rozvoj marketingu v teórii a praxi Marketing Development in Theory and Practice, eds. Jozef Striss, EDIS - Vydavatel’stvo Žilinskej Univerzity, 227-233.