Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hybrid Cascaded ANFIS–RBFNN-Based Controller For PV-Driven Grid System Cover

Hybrid Cascaded ANFIS–RBFNN-Based Controller For PV-Driven Grid System

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Block diagram of the proposed work

Figure 2.

Circuit diagram of a PV module

Figure 3.

SEPIC converter circuit diagram

Figure 4.

Modes of operation

Figure 5.

Switching waveform for the proposed converter

Figure 6.

Structure of ANFIS

Figure 7.

RBFNN architecture

Figure 8.

Proposed cascaded ANFIS–RBFNN-based MPPT

Figure 9.

Solar module waveform for case 1. (a) Temperature; (b) irradiation; (c) voltage

Figure 10.

Converter output waveform for case 1

Figure 11.

Grid waveform. (a) Voltage; (b) current; (c) in-phase voltage and current waveform

Figure 12.

Real and reactive power waveform

Figure 13.

Solar panel waveform for case 2

Figure 14.

Converter waveform for case 2

Figure 15.

Solar panel waveform for case 3

Figure 16.

Converter waveform for case 3

Figure 17.

Solar panel waveform for case 4

Figure 18.

Converter waveform for case 4

Figure 19.

THD waveform for the proposed work

Figure 20.

Comparison of tracking efficiency

Figure 21.

Comparison of (a) convergence speed and (b) execution time

Comparison of THD for Various Converters

SI. NoConvertersTHD (%)
1.Boost [11]6.42
2.Buck-Boost [12]3.43
3.Cuk [13]4.41
4.Proposed SEPIC1.16

Parameter Specifications of Proposed System

ParameterDescription
PV system
Open circuit voltage37.25V
Short-circuit current8.95A
Series-connected solar panel2
Parallel-connected solar PV cell25
Maximum power voltage29.95V
Maximum current8.35A
SEPIC
Switching frequency10kHz
Ca, Cb4.7μF
L1, L21 mH

Survey related to the traditional MPPT approaches

ReferencesMethodologyAdvantagesLimitations
Shaik rafi kiran et al (2022) [21]artificial neural network (ANN) based MPPTIt achieves better tracking efficiency with minimized oscillation of MPP.However, this system applicable for partially shaded PV system.
Faizan Mehmood et al (2020) [22]Fuzzy-based MPPTAt the period of transient condition, this technique attains better performance with efficient power delivery.Nevertheless, it has steady state oscillations and system complexity.
Sara et al (2021) [23]ANFIL-based MPPTIt has higher accuracy, faster response with better tracking.However, due to increasing number of rules, the system complexity is enhanced.
Chaoping rao et al (2022) [24]Perturb observe (P&O)-Based MPPTIt attains minimized steady-state error with better tracking efficiency.Nonetheless, the fluctuation around MPP and complexity leads to degradation of system performance.
Pawan Kumar Pathak et al (2021) [25]modified incremental conductance (INC)-based MPPTMINC attains high tracking efficacy with effectual convergence speed.However, execution time needs to be considered in further studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14313/jamris-2026-029 | Journal eISSN: 2080-2145 | Journal ISSN: 1897-8649
Language: English
Page range: 160 - 174
Submitted on: Aug 2, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 17, 2024
Published on: Jun 22, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Blessy A. Rahiman, J. Jayakumar, R. Meenal, published by Łukasiewicz Research Network – Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.