Fig. 1
An effective scoping review Introduction, from Young et al. [12]
Table 1
The story behind the synthesis: Strategies for an effective scoping review Introduction
|
1. |
Characterize the gap: it is always a lack of synthesis, but of what sort? |
|
2. |
Say why the lack of synthesis matters—what problem does it create? |
|
3. |
Specify the value of a synthesis: what does it make possible? What does its absence threaten? |
|
4. |
Introduce setting & main characters via PCC framework, but beware extended inverted triangle |
|
5. |
Sketch the contours of existing literature to establish sufficient material to review |
|
6. |
Acknowledge previous reviews and distinguish this one from them |
|
7. |
Check alignment among rationale, research question and sub-questions |
|
8. |
Prepare the reader for the relevance of a consultation exercise |