Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A method for the madness: An international survey of health professions education authors’ journal choice Cover

A method for the madness: An international survey of health professions education authors’ journal choice

Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. Sherbino J Frank JR Snell L Defining the key roles and competencies of the clinician-educator of the 21st century: A national mixed-methods study Acad Med 2014 89 783 789 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000217
  2. Glassick CE Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching Acad Med 2000 75 877 880 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00007
  3. Hu WCY Thistlethwaite JE Weller J Gallego G Monteith J McColl GJ “It was serendipity”: A qualitative study of academic careers in medical education Med Educ 2015 49 1124 1136 10.1111/medu.12822
  4. Doja A Horsley T Sampson M Productivity in medical education research: An examination of countries of origin BMC Med Educ 2014 14 1 9 10.1186/1472-6920-14-1
  5. Thomas MP The geographic and topical landscape of medical education research BMC Med Educ 2019 19 1 5 10.1186/s12909-019-1639-2
  6. Deputy editors of Medical Education Good advice from the deputy editors of Medical Education Med Educ 2012 46 828 829 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04318.x
  7. Ginsburg S Lynch M Walsh CM A fine balance: How authors strategize around journal submission Acad Med 2018 93 1176 1181 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002265
  8. Frank E Authors’ criteria for selecting journals JAMA 1994 272 163 164 10.1001/jama.1994.03520020089026
  9. Sandesh N Wahrekar S Choosing the scientific journal for publishing research work: Perceptions of medical and dental researchers Clujul Med 2017 90 196 202
  10. Eva KW The reviewer is always right: Peer review of research in Medical Education Med Educ 2009 43 2 4 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03243.x
  11. Calcagno V Demoinet E Gollner K Guidi L Ruths D de Mazancourt C Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns Science 2012 338 1065 1069 10.1126/science.1227833
  12. Dillman DA Smyth JD Christian LM Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method 2014 4 Hoboken Wiley
  13. Artino AR Driessen EW Maggio LA Ethical shades of gray: International frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education Acad Med 2019 94 76 84 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412
  14. Superchi C González JA Solà I Cobo E Hren D Boutron I Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: A methodological systematic review BMC Med Res Methodol 2019 19 1 14 10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x
  15. Phillips AW Reddy S Durning SJ Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE Guide No. 102 Med Teach 2016 38 217 228 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1105945
  16. The American Association for Public Opinion Research Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys 2016 9
  17. Kaiser HF Rice J Little Jiffy, Mark IV Educ Psychol Meas 1974 34 111 117 10.1177/001316447403400115
  18. Maggio LA Ninkov A Frank JR Costello JA Artino AR Jr Delineating the field of medical education: Bibliometric research approach(es) Med Educ 2021 10.1111/medu.14677
  19. Wang X Cheng Z Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations Chest 2020 158 1, Supplement S65 S71 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jan 9, 2022
|
Published on: Feb 22, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Eliot L. Rees, Oliver Burton, Aqua Asif, Kevin W. Eva, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.