Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of deliberate practice on evidence-based medicine attitudes and behaviours of health care professionals Cover

Impact of deliberate practice on evidence-based medicine attitudes and behaviours of health care professionals

Open Access
|Nov 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographics and EBPi scores of study groups

Group

n

Age in years, mean (SD)

Female gender (%)

EBPi score ‘attitude’, mean (SD)

EBPi score ‘decision making’, mean (SD)

EBPi score ‘intention and behaviour’, mean (SD)

Controls

16

31.6 (1.8)

13 (72)

34.74 (4.87)

10.47 (2.00)

13.35 (3.39)

Former Isala

14

32.2 (3.5)

13 (93)

35.71 (4.32)

11.29 (1.54)

14.29 (2.87)

PhDs

20

35.5 (3.3)

13 (65)

36.95 (3.66)

13.00 (1.69)

16.15 (3.75)

Current Isala (reference group)

13

49.7 (7.9)

 6 (46)

39.42 (6.29)

13.25 (1.86)

16.92 (3.40)

Fig. 1

EBPi ‘attitude’ dimension scores, reflecting participants’ attitude towards EBM, in study groups exposed to standalone EBM workshop only (controls), 15–24 months of exposure to deliberate EBM practice during residency training (former Isala), 4‑year intensive and active exposure to deliberate EBM practice in clinical PhD research programme (PhDs) and the reference group of ongoing long-term daily exposure to deliberate EBM practice (current Isala). The p value reflects a post-hoc between-group comparison (one-way ANOVA)

40037_2020_634_Fig1_HTML.png

Fig. 2

EBPi ‘decision making’ dimension scores, reflecting the priority participants give to using EBM in their clinical decision making, in study groups exposed to standalone EBM workshop only (controls), 15–24 months of exposure to deliberate EBM practice during residency training (former Isala), 4‑year intensive and active exposure to deliberate EBM practice in clinical PhD research programme (PhDs) and the reference group of ongoing long-term daily exposure to deliberate EBM practice (current Isala). The p values reflect post-hoc between-group comparisons (one-way ANOVA)

40037_2020_634_Fig2_HTML.png

Fig. 3

EBPi ‘intention and behaviour’ dimension scores, reflecting the participants’ self-reported EBM behaviour in daily practice, in study groups exposed to standalone EBM workshop only (controls), 15–24 months of exposure to deliberate EBM practice during residency training (former Isala), 4‑year intensive and active exposure to deliberate EBM practice in clinical PhD research programme (PhDs) and the reference group of ongoing long-term daily exposure to deliberate EBM practice (current Isala). The p value reflects a post-hoc between-group comparison (one-way ANOVA)

40037_2020_634_Fig3_HTML.png

Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 24, 2019
|
Accepted on: Nov 5, 2020
|
Published on: Nov 26, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Eelco Draaisma, Lauren A. Maggio, Jolita Bekhof, A. Debbie C. Jaarsma, Paul L. P. Brand, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.