Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education Cover

Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education

Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. 1.
    van der Vleuten CP Schuwirth LW Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes Med Educ 2005 39 309 317
  2. 2.
    Uijtdehaage S Schuwirth LWT Assuring the quality of programmatic assessment: moving beyond psychometrics Perspect Med Educ 2018 7 350 351
  3. 3.
    van der Vleuten CP Schuwirth LW Driessen EW A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose Med Teach 2012 34 205 214
  4. 4.
    Schuwirth LW van der Vleuten CP Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning Med Teach 2011 33 478 485
  5. 5.
    Holmboe ES Sherbino J Long DM Swing SR Frank JR The role of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2010 32 676 682
  6. 6.
    Norcini J Holmboe E Hawkins R Holmboe E Hawkins R Evaluation challenges in the era of outcomes-based education Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence 2008 Philadelphia, PA Mosby/Elsevier 1 9
  7. 7.
    Eva KW Bordage G Campbell C Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2016 21 897 913
  8. 8.
    Schuwirth L van der Vleuten C Durning SJ What programmatic assessment in medical education can learn from healthcare Perspect Med Educ 2017 6 211 215
  9. 9.
    Whittemore R Knafl K The integrative review: updated methodology J Adv Nurs. 2005 52 546 553
  10. 10.
    Bearman M Dawson P Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education Med Educ 2013 47 252 260
  11. 11.
    Gordon M Gibbs T STORIES statement: publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis BMC Med 2014 12 143
  12. 12.
    Kirkpatrick D Kirkpatrick J Transferring learning to behavior: using the four levels to improve performance 2005 San Francisco, CA Berrett-Koehler Publishers
  13. 13.
    Curran VR Fleet L A review of evaluation outcomes of web-based continuing medical education Med Educ 2005 39 561 567
  14. 14.
    Braun V Clarke V Using thematic analysis in psychology Qual Res Psychol 2006 3 77 101
  15. 15.
    Wilkinson TJ Tweed MJ Egan TG Joining the dots: conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress BMC Med Educ 2011 11 29
  16. 16.
    Driessen EW van Tartwijk J Govaerts M Teunissen P van der Vleuten CP The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: a Maastricht case report Med Teach 2012 34 226 231
  17. 17.
    Bok HG Teunissen PW Favier RP Rietbroek NJ Theyse LF Brommer H Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice BMC Med Educ 2013 13 123
  18. 18.
    Hauff SR Hopson LR Losman E Programmatic assessment of level 1 milestones in incoming interns Acad Emerg Med 2014 21 694 698
  19. 19.
    Chan T Sherbino J McMAP Collaborators. The McMaster modular assessment program (McMAP): a theoretically grounded work-based assessment system for an emergency medicine residency program Acad Med 2015 90 900 905
  20. 20.
    Heeneman S Oudkerk Pool A Schuwirth LW van der Vleuten CP Driessen EW The impact of programmatic assessment on student learning: theory versus practice Med Educ 2015 49 487 498
  21. 21.
    Bok HG Jaarsma DA Spruijt A Van Beukelen P van der Vleuten CP Teunissen PW Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships Med Teach 2016 38 88 95
  22. 22.
    Castanelli DJ Jowsey T Chen Y Weller JM Perceptions of purpose, value, and process of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anesthesia training Can J Anaesth 2016 63 1345 1356
  23. 23.
    Imanipour M Jalili M Development of a comprehensive clinical performance assessment system for nursing students: a programmatic approach Jpn J Nurs Sci 2016 13 46 54
  24. 24.
    O’Brien CL Sanguino SM Thomas JX Green MM Feasibility and outcomes of implementing a portfolio assessment system alongside a traditional grading system Acad Med 2016 91 1554 1560
  25. 25.
    Peeters MJ Vaidya VA A mixed-methods analysis in assessing students’ professional development by applying an assessment for learning approach Am J Pharm Educ 2016 80 77
  26. 26.
    de Jong LH Favier RP van der Vleuten CPM Bok HGJ Students’ motivation toward feedback-seeking in the clinical workplace Med Teach 2017 39 954 958
  27. 27.
    Heeneman S Schut S Donkers J van der Vleuten C Muijtjens A Embedding of the progress test in an assessment program designed according to the principles of programmatic assessment Med Teach 2017 39 44 52
  28. 28.
    Li SA Sherbino J Chan TM McMaster modular assessment program (McMAP) through the years: residents’ experience with an evolving feedback culture over a 3-year period. AEM Educ Train 2017 1 5 14
  29. 29.
    Zijlstra-Shaw S Roberts T Robinson PG Evaluation of an assessment system for professionalism amongst dental students Eur J Dent Educ 2017 21 e89 e100
  30. 30.
    Bacon R Kellett J Dart J A consensus model: shifting assessment practices in dietetics tertiary education Nutr Diet. 2018 75 418 430
  31. 31.
    Bok HGJ de Jong LH O’Neill T Maxey C Hecker KG Validity evidence for programmatic assessment in competency-based education Perspect Med Educ 2018 7 362 372
  32. 32.
    Ross S Binczyk NM Hamza DM Association of a competency-based assessment system with identification of and support for medical residents in difficulty JAMA Netw Open 2018 1 e184581
  33. 33.
    Schut S Driessen E van Tartwijk J van der Vleuten C Heeneman S Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners’ perceptions within programmatic assessment Med Educ 2018 52 654 663
  34. 34.
    Acai A Li SA Sherbino J Chan TM Attending emergency physicians’ perceptions of a programmatic workplace-based assessment system: the McMaster modular assessment program (McMAP) Teach Learn Med 2019 31 434 444
  35. 35.
    Castanelli DJ Weller JM Molloy E Bearman M Shadow systems in assessment: how supervisors make progress decisions in practice Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2020 25 131 147
  36. 36.
    de Jong LH Bok HGJ Kremer WDJ van der Vleuten CPM Programmatic assessment: can we provide evidence for saturation of information? Med Teach 2019 41 678 682
  37. 37.
    Favier RP Vernooij JCM Jonker FH Bok HGJ Inter-rater reliability of grading undergraduate portfolios in veterinary medical education. J Vet Med Educ 2019 46 415 422
  38. 38.
    Griffiths J Dalgarno N Schultz K Han H van Melle E Competency-based medical education implementation: are we transforming the culture of assessment? Med Teach 2019 41 811 818
  39. 39.
    Meeuwissen SNE Stalmeijer RE Govaerts M Multiple-role mentoring: mentors’ conceptualisations, enactments and role conflicts Med Educ 2019 53 605 615
  40. 40.
    Rich JV Fostaty YS Donnelly C Competency-based education calls for programmatic assessment: but what does this look like in practice? J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 10.1111/jep.13328
  41. 41.
    Schut S van Tartwijk J Driessen E van der Vleuten C Heeneman S Understanding the influence of teacher–learner relationships on learners’ assessment perception Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2019 10.1007/s10459-019-09935-z
  42. 42.
    Hargreaves E Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box. Camb J Educ 2005 35 213 224
  43. 43.
    Miller GE The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance Acad Med 1990 65 63 67
  44. 44.
    Telio S Ajjawi R The RG “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education Acad Med 2015 90 609 614
  45. 45.
    Sargeant J Lockyer J Mann K Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2) Acad Med 2015 90 1698 1706
  46. 46.
    Norcini J Anderson MB Bollela V Consensus framework for good assessment Med Teach 2018 2018 40 1102 1109
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 26, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 29, 2020
Published on: Oct 21, 2020
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Suzanne Schut, Lauren A. Maggio, Sylvia Heeneman, Jan van Tartwijk, Cees van der Vleuten, Erik Driessen, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.