Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education Cover

Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education

Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. Artino AR Driessen E Maggio LA Ethical shades of gray: questionable research practices in health professions education Acad Med 2019 94 76 84 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412
  2. Uijtdehaage S Mavis B Durning SJ Whose paper is it anyway? Authorship criteria according to established scholars in health professions education Acad Med 2018 93 1171 1175 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002144
  3. Steneck NH Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions Sci Eng Ethics 2006 12 53 74 10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y
  4. Tijdink JK Bouter LM Veldkamp CLS Personality traits are associated with research misbehavior in Dutch scientists: a cross-sectional study PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0163251 10.1371/journal.pone.0163251
  5. Tijdink JK Verbeke R Smulders YM Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics. 2014 9 64 71 10.1177/1556264614552421
  6. John LK Loewenstein G Prelec D Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling Psychol Sci 2012 23 524 532 10.1177/0956797611430953
  7. Dalton D Ortegren M Gender differences in ethics research: the importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias J Bus Ethics 2011 103 73 93 10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
  8. Fanelli D Costas R Lariviere V Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity PLoS ONE 2015 10 e0127556 10.1371/journal.pone.0127556
  9. Nosek BA Alter G Borsboom Promoting an open research culture Science 2015 348 1422 1425 10.1126/science.aab2374
  10. Keune JD Brunsvold ME Hohmann E The ethics of conducting graduate medical education research on residents Acad Med 2013 88 449 453 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182854bef
  11. Eva KW How would you like your salami? A guide to slicing Med Educ 2017 51 456 457 10.1111/medu.13285
  12. Bouter LM Tijdink J Axelsen N Martinson BC ter Riet G Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity Res Integr Peer Rev 2016 1 17 10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5
  13. Tijdink J Smulders Y Vergouwen A de Vet H Knol D The assessment of publication pressure in medical science; validity and reliability of a Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) Qual Life Res 2014 23 2055 2062
  14. The American Association for Public Opinion Research Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys 2016
  15. Phillips AW Reddy S Durning SJ Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE Guide No. 102 Med Teach 2016 38 217 228 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1105945
  16. McCoach DB Gable RK Madura JP Instrument development in the affective domain: school and corporate applications 2013 New York Springer Science & Business 10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
  17. Cohen P West SG Aiken LS Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2014 London Psychology Press 10.4324/9781410606266
  18. Dinis-Oliveira RJ Magalhaes T The inherent drawbacks of the pressure to publish in health sciences: good or bad science F1000Res 2015 4 419 10.12688/f1000research.6809.1
  19. George SL Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors Int J Clin Oncol 2016 21 15 21 10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3
  20. Kornfeld DS Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy Acad Med 2012 87 877 882 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318257ee6a
  21. Van Dalen HP Henkens K Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: a worldwide survey J Assoc Info Sci Tech 2012 63 1282 1293 10.1002/asi.22636
  22. Anderson MS Ronning EA De Vries R Martinson BC The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships Sci Eng Ethics 2007 13 437 461 10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5
  23. Tijdink JK Vergouwen ACM Smulders YM Publication pressure and burn out among dutch medical professors; a nationwide survey Eur Psychiatry 2014 29 1
  24. Bulger RE Heitman E Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university Acad Med 2007 82 876 878 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909
  25. DuBois JM Chibnall JT Tait R Vander Wal JS The professionalism and integrity in research program: description and preliminary outcomes Acad Med 2018 93 586 592 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001804
  26. DuBois JM Dueker JM Anderson EE Campbell J The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program Acad Med 2008 83 596 603 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181723095
  27. Resnik DB Dinse GE Do U.S. Research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? a national survey Acad Med 2012 87 1237 1242 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318260fe5c
  28. Resnik DB Stewart CN Jr Expanding the scope of responsible conduct of research instruction Account Res 2014 21 321 327 10.1080/08989621.2013.848802
  29. Lee CS Schrank A Incubating innovation or cultivating corruption? The developmental state and the life sciences in Asia Soc Forces 2010 88 1231 1255 10.1353/sof.0.0282
  30. Liao QJ Zhang YY Fan YC Perceptions of Chinese biomedical researchers towards academic misconduct: a comparison between 2015 and 2010 Sci Eng Ethics 2017 10.1007/s11948-017-9913-3
  31. Claudot F Alla F Ducrocq X Coudane H Teaching ethics in Europe J Med Ethics 2007 33 491 10.1136/jme.2006.017921
  32. Silverberg LI Survey of medical ethics in US medical schools: a descriptive study J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2000 100 373 378
  33. Fanelli D How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data PLoS ONE 2009 4 e5738 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
Language: English
Published on: Mar 26, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Lauren Maggio, Ting Dong Dong, Erik Driessen, Anthony Artino Jr., published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.