Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Nudging clinical supervisors to provide better in-training assessment reports Cover

Nudging clinical supervisors to provide better in-training assessment reports

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Holmboe ES Sherbino J Long DM Swing SR Frank JR The role of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2010 32 676 682 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500704
  2. Pangaro LN Durning SJ Holmboe ES Holmboe ES Durning SJ Hawkins RE Evaluation Frameworks, Forms, and Global Rating Scales editors. Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Clinical Competence 2018 2 Philadelphia, PA Elsevier 37 57
  3. Norcini J Anderson MB Bollela V Consensus framework for good assessment Med Teach 2018 2018 40 1102 1109 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016
  4. Holmboe ES Ward DS Reznick RK Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education Acad Med 2011 86 460 467 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820cb2a7
  5. Dudek NL Marks MB Wood TJ Quality evaluation reports: Can a faculty development program make a difference? Med Teach 2012 34 e725 31 10.3109/0142159X.2012.689444
  6. Thaler RH Nudge SCR improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness 2009 New York Penguin Books
  7. Arno A Thomas S The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Public Health 2016 16 676 10.1186/s12889-016-3272-x
  8. Lehner M Mont O Heiskanen E Nudging—A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? J Clean Prod 2016 134 166 177 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.086
  9. White C Fantone J Pass-fail grading: laying the foundation for self-regulated learning Adv Health Sci Educ 2010 15 469 477 10.1007/s10459-009-9211-1
  10. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS 2015. Physician Competency Framework; 2015.
  11. Dudek NL Marks MB Wood TJ Lee AC Assessing the quality of supervisors’ completed clinical evaluation reports Med Educ 2008 42 816 822 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03105.x
  12. Dudek NL Marks MB Bandiera G White J Wood TJ Quality in-training evaluation reports—does feedback drive faculty performance? Acad Med 2013 88 1129 1134 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299394c
  13. Cheung WJ Dudek NL Wood TJ Frank JR Supervisor-trainee continuity and the quality of work-based assessments Med Educ 2017 51 1260 1268 10.1111/medu.13415
  14. Wilbur K Does faculty development influence the quality of in-training evaluation reports in pharmacy? BMC Med Educ 2017 17 222 10.1186/s12909-017-1054-5
  15. Nicol DJ Macfarlane-Dick D Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice Stud High Educ 2006 31 199 218 10.1080/03075070600572090
  16. Harrison CJ Könings KD Molyneux A Schuwirth LWT Wass V Van der Vleuten CPM Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage? Med Educ 2013 47 734 744 10.1111/medu.12209
  17. Schumacher DJ Michelson C Poynter S Thresholds and interpretations: How clinical competency committees identify pediatric residents with performance concerns Med Teach 2018 40 70 79 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1394576
  18. Ginsburg S van der Vleuten CP Eva KW The Hidden Value of Narrative Comments for Assessment: A Quantitative Reliability Analysis of Qualitative Data Acad Med 2017 92 1617 1621 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001669
  19. Ginsburg S Regehr G Lingard L Eva KW Reading between the lines: Faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments Med Educ 2015 49 296 306 10.1111/medu.12637
  20. Bartels J Mooney CJ Stone RT Numerical versus narrative: A comparison between methods to measure medical student performance during clinical clerkships Med Teach 2017 39 1154 1158 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1368467
Language: English
Published on: Dec 17, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Valérie Dory, Beth-Ann Cummings, Mélanie Mondou, Meredith Young, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.