References
-
1.
Charlin B van der Vleuten C Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty: the script concordance approach Eval Health Prof 2014 27 304 319 10.1177/0163278704267043
-
2.
Schmidt HG Norman GR Boshuizen HPA A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implications Acad Med 1990 65 611 621 10.1097/00001888-199010000-00001
-
3.
Lemieux M Bordage G Propositional versus structural semantic analyses of medical diagnostic thinking Cogn. Sci. 1992 16 185 204 10.1207/s15516709cog1602_2
-
4.
Feltovich PJ Barrows HS Schmidt H De Volder ML Issues of generality in medical problem solving Tutorials in problem-based learning: a new direction in teaching the health professions 1984 Assen Van Gorcum
-
5.
Charlin B Boshuizen H Custers E Feltovitch P Scripts and clinical reasoning Med Educ 2007 41 1178 1184 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02924.x
-
6.
Custers EJFM Thirty years of illness scripts: theoretical origins and practical applications Med Teach 2015 37 457 462 10.3109/0142159X.2014.956052
-
7.
Lubarsky S Dory V Duggan P Gagnon R Charlin B Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE guide no. 75 Med Teach 2013 35 184 193 10.3109/0142159X.2013.760036
-
8.
Norman GR Objective measurement of clinical performance Med Educ 1985 19 43 47 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01137.x
-
9.
Norcini JJ Shea JA Day SC The use of the aggregate scoring for a recertification examination Eval Health Prof 1990 13 241 251 10.1177/016327879001300207
-
10.
Charlin B Brailovsky CA Leduc C Blouin D The diagnosis script questionnaire: a new tool to assess a specific dimension of clinical competence Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1998 3 51 58 10.1023/A:1009741430850
-
11.
Lubarsky S Charlin B Cook DA Chalk C van der Vleuten C Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence Med Educ 2011 45 329 338 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03863.x
-
12.
Cook DA Beckman TJ Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application Am J Med 2006 119 166.e7 166.e16 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
-
13.
Gagnon R Charlin B Roy L The cognitive validity of the script concordance test: a time processing study Teach Learn Med 2006 18 22 27 10.1207/s15328015tlm1801_6
-
14.
Ahmadi SF Khoshkish S Soltani-Arabshahi K Challenging script concordance test reference standard by evidence: do judgments by emergency medicine consultants agree with likelihood ratios? Int J Emerg Med 2014 7 34 10.1186/s12245-014-0034-3
-
15.
Kreiter C Commentary: the response process validity of a script concordance item Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011 17 7 9 10.1007/s10459-011-9325-0
-
16.
Lineberry M Kreiter CD Bordage G Threats to the validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores Med Educ 2013 47 1175 1183 10.1111/medu.12283
-
17.
Wilson AB Pike GR Humbert A Preliminary factor analyses raise concerns about script concordance test utility Med Sci Educ 2014
-
18.
Bland A Kreiter C Gordon J The psychometric properties of five scoring methods applied to the Script Concordance Test Acad Med 2005 80 395 399 10.1097/00001888-200504000-00019
-
19.
Gagnon R Charlin B Coletti M Sauve E van der Vleuten C Assessment in the context of uncertainty: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test? Med Educ 2005 39 284 291 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02092.x
-
20.
Lambert C Gagnon R Nguyen D Charlin B The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning Radiat Oncol 2009 4 7 10.1186/1748-717X-4-7
-
21.
Lubarsky S Chalk C Kazitani D Gagnon R Charlin B The Script Concordance Test: a new tool assessing clinical judgement in neurology Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009 36 326 331 10.1017/S031716710000706X
-
22.
Nouh T Boutros M Gagnon R The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning: a national validation study Am J Surg 2012 203 530 534 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.006
-
23.
Wilson AB Pike GR Humbert A Analyzing script concordance test: scoring methods and items by difficulty and type Teach Learn Med 2014 26 135 145 10.1080/10401334.2014.884464
-
24.
Downing SM Threats to the validity of locally developed multiple-choice tests in medical education: construct-irrelevant variance and construct underrepresentation Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2002 7 235 241 10.1023/A:1021112514626
-
25.
Williams RG Klamen DA McGaghie WC Special article: cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings Teach Learn Med 2003 15 270 292 10.1207/S15328015TLM1504_11
-
26.
See KC Tan KL Lim TK The script concordance test for clinical reasoning: re-examining its utility and potential weakness Med Educ 2014 48 1069 1077 10.1111/medu.12514
-
27.
Fournier JP Demeester A Charlin B Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2008 8 18 10.1186/1472-6947-8-18
-
28.
Friedman Ben-David M Dent J Harden RM Principles of assessment A practical guide for medical teachers 2005 2 Edinburgh, Churchill, Livingstone Elsevier
-
29.
Boulouffe C Charlin B Vanpee D Evaluation of clinical reasoning in basic emergencies using a script concordance test Am J Pharm Educ 2010 74 1 6 10.5688/aj7410194
-
30.
Ramaekers S Kremer W Pilot A van Keulen H Assessment of competence in clinical reasoning and decision-making under uncertainty: the script concordance test method Assess Eval High Educ 2010 35 661 673 10.1080/02602938.2010.500103
-
31.
Dawson T Comer L Kossick MA Neubrander J Can script concordance testing be used in nursing education to accurately assess clinical reasoning skills? J Nurs Educ 2014 53 281 286 10.3928/01484834-20140321-03
-
32.
Van den Broek WES van Asperen MV Custers EJFM Valk GD ten Cate O Effects of two different instructional formats on scores and reliability of a script concordance test Perspect Med Educ 2012 1 119 128 10.1007/s40037-012-0017-0