Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Using parent feedback: A qualitative study of residents’ and physician-educators’ perspectives Cover

Using parent feedback: A qualitative study of residents’ and physician-educators’ perspectives

Open Access
|Dec 2017

References

  1. 1.
    Abadel FT Hattab AS Patients’ assessment of professionalism and communication skills of medical graduates Bmc Med Educ 2014 14 28 10.1186/1472-6920-14-28
  2. 2.
    Moreau KA Eady K Frank JR A qualitative exploration of which resident skills parents in pediatric emergency departments can assess Med Teach 2016 38 1118 1124 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170783
  3. 3.
    Committee on Hospital Care Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care Patient- and family-centered care and the pediatrician’s role Pediatrics 2012 129 394 404 10.1542/peds.2011-3084
  4. 4.
    Institute for Patient- and Family-Centered Care Patient- and family-centered care 2016
  5. 5.
    Bleakley A Bligh J Students learning from patients: let’s get real in medical education Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008 13 89 107 10.1007/s10459-006-9028-0
  6. 6.
    Towle A Farrell C Gaines ME The patient’s voice in health and social care professional education Int J Health Gov 2016 21 18 25 10.1108/IJHG-01-2016-0003
  7. 7.
    Towle A Godolphin W Patient involvement in health professional education: a bibliography 1975—November 2016 2016
  8. 8.
    Crossley J Eiser C Davies HA Children and their parents assessing the doctor-patient interaction: a rating system for doctors’ communication skills Med Educ 2005 39 820 828 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02230.x
  9. 9.
    McGraw M Fellows S Long A Feedback on doctors’ performance from parents and carers of children: a national pilot study Arch Dis Child 2012 97 206 210 10.1136/adc.2010.203174
  10. 10.
    Campbell C Lockyer J Laidlaw T MacLeod H Assessment of a matched-pair instrument to examine doctor-patient communication skills in practising doctors Med Educ 2007 41 123 129 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02657.x
  11. 11.
    Makoul G Krupat E Chang CH Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the communication assessment tool Patient Educ Couns 2007 67 333 342 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005
  12. 12.
    Frank JR Snell LS Cate OT Competency-based medical education: theory to practice Med Teach 2010 32 638 645 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190
  13. 13.
    Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada CBD implementation 2017 2017
  14. 14.
    Holmboe ES Sherbino J Long DM Swing SR Frank JR The role of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2010 32 676 682 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500704
  15. 15.
    Holmboe ES Holmboe ES Hawkins RE Direct observation by faculty Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence 2008 Philadelphia Mosby 119 129
  16. 16.
    Norcini JJ Current perspectives in assessment: the assessment of performance at work Med Educ 2005 39 880 889 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02182.x
  17. 17.
    Norcini JJ The role of assessment in supporting the movement toward patient-centred care Perspect Med Educ 2017 6 5 6 10.1007/s40037-016-0318-9
  18. 18.
    Jonsson A Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education Act. Learn. High. Educ. 2012 14 63 76 10.1177/1469787412467125
  19. 19.
    Ramani S Krackov SK Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment Med Teach 2012 34 787 791 10.3109/0142159X.2012.684916
  20. 20.
    van de Ridder JM McGaghie WC Stokking KM ten Cate OT Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta-review Med Educ 2015 49 658 673 10.1111/medu.12744
  21. 21.
    Ferguson J Wakeling J Bowie P Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review BMC Med Educ 2014 14 76 10.1186/1472-6920-14-76
  22. 22.
    Sargeant J Armson H Chesluk B The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model Acad Med 2010 85 1212 1220 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d85a4e
  23. 23.
    Watling C Cognition, culture, and credibility: deconstructing feedback in medical education Perspect Med Educ 2014 3 124 128 10.1007/s40037-014-0115-2
  24. 24.
    Holmboe ES Ross K Commentary: realizing the formative potential of multisource feedback in regulatory-based assessment programs Acad Med 2012 87 1657 1659 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182724df6
  25. 25.
    Lockyer J Clyman SG Holmboe ES Hawkins RE Multisource feedback (360-degree evaluation) Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence 2008 Philadelphia Mosby 75 85
  26. 26.
    Lockyer J Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003 23 4 12 10.1002/chp.1340230103
  27. 27.
    Holt KD Miller RS Nasca TJ Residency programs’ evaluations of the competencies: data provided to the ACGME about types of assessments used by programs J Grad Med Educ 2010 2 649 655 10.4300/JGME-02-04-30
  28. 28.
    Moreau KA Pound CM Eady K Pediatric caregiver involvement in the assessment of physicians BMC Med Educ 2015 15 123 10.1186/s12909-015-0402-6
  29. 29.
    Merriam SB Qualitative research in practice 2002 San Francisco John Wiley & Sons
  30. 30.
    Patton MQ Qualitative evaluation and research methods 2015 2 Newbury Park SAGE
  31. 31.
    Morgan DL Ataie J Carder P Hoffman K Introducing dyadic interviews as a method for collecting qualitative data Qual Health Res 2013 23 1276 1284 10.1177/1049732313501889
  32. 32.
    Morgan DL Eliot S Lowe RA Gorman P Dyadic interviews as a tool for qualitative evaluation Am J Eval 2016 37 109 117 10.1177/1098214015611244
  33. 33.
    Sohier R The dyadic interview as a tool for nursing research Appl Nurs Res 1995 8 96 101 10.1016/S0897-1897(95)80562-1
  34. 34.
    Lincoln Y Guba E Naturalistic inquiry 1985 Beverly Hills SAGE
  35. 35.
    NVivo 11 for Windows. 11 ed. Burlington, MA: QSR International; 2015.
  36. 36.
    Miles MB Huberman AM Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook 1994 2 Thousand Oaks SAGE
  37. 37.
    Morse JM Analytic strategies and sample size Qual Health Res 2015 25 1317 1318 10.1177/1049732315602867
  38. 38.
    Ramani S Post SE Konings K Mann K Katz JT van der Vleuten C It’s not just the culture: a qualitative study exploring residents’ perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback Teach Learn Med 2017 29 153 161 10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014
  39. 39.
    Morgan A Jones D Perceptions of service user and carer involvement in healthcare education and impact on students’ knowledge and practice: a literature review Med Teach 2009 31 82 95 10.1080/01421590802526946
  40. 40.
    Chou S Lockyer J Cole G McLaughlin K Assessing postgraduate trainees in Canada: are we achieving diversity in methods? Med Teach 2009 31 e58 e64 10.1080/01421590802512938
  41. 41.
    Lockyer J Carraccio C Chan MK Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2017 39 609 616 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082
  42. 42.
    Keister DM Hansen SE Dostal J Teaching resident self-assessment through triangulation of faculty and patient feedback Teach Learn Med 2017 29 25 30 10.1080/10401334.2016.1246249
Language: English
Published on: Dec 18, 2017
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Kaylee Eady, Katherine A. Moreau, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.