Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Peer-led small groups: Are we on the right track? Cover

Peer-led small groups: Are we on the right track?

By: Fraser Moore  
Open Access
|Aug 2017

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Participant feedback regarding the small group experience. Each question was answered on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Results are expressed as the average of all student responses for a given question. (n refers to the number of questionnaires received, not the number of students attending the small groups)

Item

SG2 (peer tutor)

n = 82

SG12 (peer tutor)

n = 57

SG15 (non-peer)

n = 36

1. I enjoyed this small group session

4.25

3.93

4.28

2. This small group session helped me to learn the material presented

4.18

3.97

4.11

3. I feel that we fully covered the required topic during this small group session

4.16

4.07

4.17

4. I feel that my group ‘cut corners’ and did not spend the time necessary to discuss the topic

1.58*

2.12*

1.94*

5. There was good discussion among group members during the small group session

4.51**

3.90**

4.31**

6. It was easy for me to express my opinion

4.35***

3.98***

4.11***

7. One or a few students dominated the discussion during the group

2.72

2.89

2.71

8. This small group session should be repeated in the course next year

4.01

3.72

4.06

*p = 0.0003 **p < 0.0001 ***p = 0.047

Table 2

Participant feedback regarding the follow-up lecture to small group 2 (peer tutor) and the written report for small group 12 (peer tutor). Each question was answered on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 =strongly disagree to 5 =strongly agree. Results are expressed as the mean of all student responses for a given question

Lecture

(n = 57)

It was helpful to review the small group material during the lecture

4.55

The lecture improved my understanding of the small group material

4.27

Reviewing the small group material in the lecture was not helpful for me

1.54

I would have preferred to use the time during the lecture to cover other material, rather than reviewing the small group

1.81

Written report

(n = 60)

It was helpful to submit the written report following the small group

3.72

The feedback our group received regarding the written report improved my understanding of the material discussed in the small group

3.98

Submitting the written report was unnecessary

2.57

Small group time would have been more appropriately used for group discussion, rather than preparing the report

2.60

Language: English
Published on: Aug 18, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Fraser Moore, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.