Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A survey of graduates’ perceptions on a Chinese medical school’s traditional and reform curricula Cover

A survey of graduates’ perceptions on a Chinese medical school’s traditional and reform curricula

Open Access
|Jul 2016

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Evaluation of basic science education

Items

1) Basic science content objectives were made clear to students

2) Basic science content was sufficiently integrated across basic science courses

3) Basic science content objectives and examination content matched closely

4) Basic science content had sufficient illustrations of clinical relevance

5) Basic science content provided relevant preparation for clerkships

% of agree

TC

57.9

37.9

56.6

43.4

65.5

RC

78.8

72.7

81.8

69.7

72.7

TC

Mean

3.48

3.20

3.46

3.26

3.64

SD

0.973

0.925

0.936

0.993

0.926

RC

Mean

4.03

3.91

4.03

3.85

3.91

SD

0.770

0.843

0.728

0.906

0.843

U (p)

*1,657.5 (0.003)

*1,401.5 (<0.0001)

*1,587.5

(0.001)

*1,616.5

(0.002)

2,041.0

(0.153)

Cohen’s d

−0.627

−0.802

−0.680

−0.621

−0.305

*stands for significant difference

Table 2

Evaluation of clerkships

Items

1) I received clear learning objectives for the clerkship

2) My performance was assessed against the learning objectives

3) I had an opportunity to follow a variety of patients (with different conditions)

4) A faculty member observed me taking patient history

5) A faculty member observed me performing physical examinations

6) Faculty members provided me with sufficient feedback

7) Faculty members provided effective teaching

Internal medicine

3.53

(1.121)

54.6 %

3.53

(1.074)

54.6 %

3.82

(0.941)

70.3 %

3.77

(1.057)

67.1 %

3.76

(1.025)

65.9 %

3.64

(1.018)

62.9 %

3.87

(1.026)

70.3 %

Surgery

3.65

(1.069)

60.1 %

3.70

(1.001)

62.9 %

3.87

(0.885)

68.5 %

3.77

(0.985)

65.7 %

3.80

(1.016)

66.8 %

3.83

(0.938)

68.6 %

3.94

(0.931)

72.4 %

Obstetrics, gynecology

3.73

(1.025)

60.7 %

3.79

(0.966)

66.1 %

3.89

(0.899)

67.9 %

3.82

(0.975)

63.1 %

3.86

(0.947)

68.5 %

3.78

(0.950)

65.5 %

3.93

(0.932)

72.1 %

Pediatrics

3.81

(0.992)

64.6 %

3.81

(0.975)

64.6 %

3.87

(0.933)

68.2 %

3.91

(0.937)

70.6 %

3.86

(0.933)

67.6 %

3.91

(0.949)

72.4 %

3.97

(0.915)

72.4 %

Community medicine

3.55

(1.172)

65.5 %

3.57

(1.126)

60.4 %

3.47

(1.112)

53.4 %

3.52

(1.128)

56.9 %

3.51

(1.120)

57.9 %

3.47

(1.127)

53.4 %

3.48

(1.157)

56.6 %

Psychiatry

3.63

(0.966)

60.3 %

3.56

(0.944)

57.8 %

3.51

(0.958)

53.7 %

3.55

(1.010)

54.4 %

3.48

(0.981)

50 %

3.71

(0.958)

64.7 %

3.65

(0.947)

61.1 %

Mean, SD (in parentheses), and percentages (%) of students who ‘agree’ with given statements

Table 3

Students’ views on their readiness for residency training (items 1–7) and overall satisfaction with education (8)

Items

1) I am confident that I have acquired the clinical skills required to begin a residency programme

2) I have the fundamental understanding of common conditions and their management encountered in the major clinical disciplines

3) I have the communication skills necessary to interact with patients and health professionals

4) I have basic skills in clinical decision making and the application of evidence based information to medical practice

5) I have a fundamental understanding of the issues in social sciences of medicine

6) I understand the ethical and professional values that are expected of the profession

7) I believe I am adequately prepared to care for patients from different backgrounds

8) Generally I’m satisfied with the quality of my medical education

% of agree

TC

42.8

51.0

56.6

37.2

44.1

50.4

37.9

44.2

RC

63.6

87.9

84.9

48.5

60.6

72.7

57.6

81.8

TC

M

3.23

3.38

3.54

3.21

3.30

3.43

3.20

3.28

SD

0.965

0.898

0.841

0.904

0.930

0.864

0.955

0.886

RC

M

3.61

4.00

4.00

3.33

3.61

3.79

3.61

4.00

SD

0.899

0.612

0.559

0.816

0.609

0.650

0.747

0.612

U (p)

1,874.5 (0.041)

*1,442.0 (<.0001)

*1,669.0 (0.003)

2,188.5 (0.417)

1,954.0 (0.078)

1,828.5 (0.023)

1,811.5 (0.021)

*1,308.0 (<.0001)

Cohen’s d

−0.407

−0.807

−0.644

−0.139

−0.394

−0.471

−0.478

−0.946

*stands for significant difference

TC traditional curriculum, RC reform curriculum

Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 19, 2016
|
Accepted on: May 30, 2016
|
Published on: Jul 19, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Renslow Sherer, Hongmei Dong, Feng Yu, Jingyi Fan, Jinxin Li, Ivy Jiang, Brian Cooper, Jonathan Lio, Yunfeng Zhou, Jiong Yang, Baoping Yu, Xiangting Yu, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.