Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reducing length of stay and satisfying learner needs Cover

Reducing length of stay and satisfying learner needs

Open Access
|May 2016

Figures & Tables

Tab. 1

Teaching shift curriculum

Day

Activity

Time (in h)

1

Orientation to site 1 ED and emergency medicine rotation

1

(at site 1)

aAdvanced clinical skills – abdominal pain

2

Lunch – psychosocial learning topics explained and assigned

1

aAdvanced clinical skills – abdominal pain

1

Suturing/wound care skills session

2

2

Orientation to site 2 ED

0.5

(at site 2)

Advanced clinical skills – musculoskeletal

1.5

The first 10 minutes of trauma – simulation

1

Psychosocial topic discussion

1

3

(at site 2)

aAdvanced clinical skills – chest pain and shortness of breath

2

The first 10 minutes of cardiac emergency – simulation

2

Lunch – psychosocial topic discussion

1

aAdvanced clinical skills – chest pain and shortness of breath

2

Wrap up – evaluations

1

aDuring the first hour of these morning advanced clinical skills sessions, one half of the group would see previously assessed ED patients for a brief history and focused physical exam while the other half participated in image interpretation independent learning modules. The groups would then come together for the case presentation and discussion in the second hour. In the afternoon, the process would be repeated with the groups reversed

Tab. 2

Emergency department length of stay (EDLOS)

EDLOS

Rotations

n a

Medianb

Diffb

95 % CI

Block 1

Clerks in ED

5694

263

Clerks in teaching shifts

5544

243

−20

−27.3, −12.7

Block 2

Clerks in ED

4466

245

Clerks in teaching shifts

4533

250

5

−4.4, 14.4

Block 3

Clerks in ED

4606

233

Clerks in teaching shifts

4749

240

7

4.4, 9.6

Block 4

Clerks in ED

5694

237

Clerks in teaching shifts

5712

235.5

−1.5

−9.5, 6.5

Overall

Clerks in ED

20,460

246

Clerks in teaching shifts

20,538

241

−5

−8.8, −1.2

Total

40,998

n number; diff difference; CI confidence interval

anumber of ED visits

btime measured in minutes

Tab. 3

Factor analysis of self-efficacy statements

Pre/Post survey

Included statement

K-base

Suturing

Teams

Trauma

1. I know how to give a report to another member of the healthcare team who is about to take over the care of a patient I have looked after

0.55/0.65

2. I am able to assess an acutely injured knee

0.54/0.41

3. I know how to recognize and initiate treatment for hypovolaemic shock

0.50/0.45

4. I am able to suture a simple skin laceration

0.76/0.73

5. I am able to infiltrate a wound with local anaesthetic

0.69/0.72

6. I know how to choose an appropriate local anaesthetic for suturing

0.61/0.57

7. I know when a wound should NOT be sutured in the ED

0.58/0.71

8. I am able to lead a team in a basic resuscitation situation

0.79/0.98

9. I am able to communicate effectively as part of a resuscitation team

0.75/0.61

10. I know how to call a ‘Code Blue’ in any London Hospital

0.44/0.45

11. I am able to apply cervical spine precautions in a patient who may have a cervical spine fracture, both inside and outside of the hospital setting

0.82/0.82

12. I am able to implement the Canadian C‑Spine rules

0.59/0.50

13. I am able to direct and assist in log rolling a trauma patient

0.44/0.55

Removed statement

K-base

Suturing

Teams

Trauma

14. I am able to perform a primary survey in a trauma patient

0.76/0.51

–/0.34

15. I am able to perform bag-valve mask ventilation

0.58/–

16. I know how to calculate a patient’s Glasgow Coma Score

0.49/–

17. I am able to generate an appropriate list of differential diagnoses in a patient with chest pain presenting to the ED

–/–

18. I know how to make a plan for the investigation and treatment of a patient presenting to the ED with abdominal pain

0.43/–

0.48/–

19. I am able to defibrillate a patient in cardiac arrest at the appropriate time for the appropriate rhythm

–/0.39

0.55/0.33

20. I am able to demonstrate all basic life support skills in the appropriate sequence

0.53/–

–/0.50

Factor loadings <0.30 are suppressed

K-base knowledge base

Tab. 4

Pretest/posttest self-efficacy dimensions

Pretest

Posttest

98.75 % CI for mean difference

Outcome

M

SD

M

SD

n

t

df

Cohen’s D

Knowledge base

4.71

1.02

5.86

0.56

122

0.92,1.37

13.11**

121

1.19

Suturing

4.00

1.26

5.45

0.97

122

1.18,1.71

13.82**

121

1.25

Teams

2.67

1.11

5.55

0.85

122

2.59,3.16

25.50**

121

2.30

Trauma

3.31

1.33

5.54

0.83

122

1.93,2.56

18.04**

121

1.63

98.75 confidence interval calculated using Bonferroni adjusted alpha (0.05/4); ** p < 0.001

Fig. 1

Pre/post teaching shifts differential diagnosis paper-based case contrasts: Student A. (MSK musculoskeletal, MI myocardial infarction, resp respiratory, SOB shortness of breath, GI gastrointestinal, GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease, CAS[ACS] acute coronary syndrome, PE pulmonary embolus, pneumo pneumothorax)

Fig. 2

Pre/post teaching shifts differential diagnosis paper-based case contrasts: Student B. (MI myocardial infarction, PE pulmonary embolus, GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease)

Language: English
Page range: 170 - 178
Published on: May 31, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Lisa Shepherd, Saad Chahine, Michelle Klingel, Elaine Zibrowski, Allison Meiwald, Lorelei Lingard, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.