Evaluating clinicians’ teaching performance

Benjamin C.M. Benjamin C.M. Boerebach

doi:10.1007/S40037-015-0215-7

Abstract

Evaluations of clinicians’ teaching performance are usually a preliminary, although essential, activity in quality management and improvement activities. This PhD project focused on testing the validity, reliability and impact of a performance evaluation system named the System of Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) across specialities and centres in the Netherlands. The results of this project show that the SETQ questionnaires can provide clinicians with valid and reliable performance feedback that can enhance their teaching performance. Also, we tried to investigate the predictive validity of the SETQ. In conclusion, the SETQ appears to be a helpful tool for improving clinicians’ teaching performance.

References

1.
Sargeant J Eva KW Armson H Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance Med Educ 2011 45 636 47 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03888.x

Back to article
2.
Sargeant J Armson H Chesluk B The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model Acad Med 2010 85 1212 20 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d85a4e

Back to article
3.
Lombarts KM Bucx MJ Arah OA Development of a system for the evaluation of the teaching qualities of anesthesiology faculty Anesthesiology 2009 111 709 16 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b76516

Back to article
4.
Lombarts MJ Bucx MJ Rupp I Keijzers PJ Kokke SI Schlack W [An instrument for the assessment of the training qualities of clinician-educators] Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2007 151 2004 8

Back to article
5.
van der Leeuw R Slootweg IA Heineman MJ Lombarts K Explaining how faculty act upon residentsʼ feedback to improve their teaching performance Med Educ 2013 47 1089 98 10.1111/medu.12257

Back to article
6.
van der Leeuw RM Overeem K Arah OA Heineman MJ Lombarts KM Frequency and determinants of residentsʼ narrative feedback on the teaching performance of faculty: narratives in numbers Acad Med 2013 88 9 1324 31 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829e3af4

Back to article
7.
Mann K van der Vleuten C Eva K Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict Acad Med 2011 86 1120 7 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226abdd

Back to article
8.
Boerebach BC Lombarts KM Keijzer C Heineman MJ Arah OA The teacher, the physician and the person: how facultyʼs teaching performance influences their role modelling PLoS One 2012 7 e32089 10.1371/journal.pone.0032089

Back to article
9.
Benbassat J Role modeling in medical education: the importance of a reflective imitation Acad Med 2014 89 550 4 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000189

Back to article
10.
Cruess SR Cruess RL Steinert Y Role modelling–making the most of a powerful teaching strategy BMJ 2008 336 718 21 10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE

Back to article
11.
Boerebach BC Lombarts KM Scherpbier AJ Arah OA The teacher, the physician and the person: exploring causal connections between teaching performance and role model types using directed acyclic graphs PLoS One 2013 8 e69449 10.1371/journal.pone.0069449

Back to article
12.
Fluit CR Bolhuis S Grol R Laan R Wensing M Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers J Gen Intern Med 2010 25 1337 45 10.1007/s11606-010-1458-y

Back to article
13.
Ivers NM Grimshaw JM Jamtvedt G Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care J Gen Intern Med 2014 29 1534 41 10.1007/s11606-014-2913-y

Back to article
14.
Ostroff C Atwater LE Feinberg BJ Understanding self-other agreement: a look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes Personnel Psychology 2004 57 333 75 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02494.x

Back to article
15.
Sargeant J McNaughton E Mercer S Murphy D Sullivan P Bruce DA Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback Med Teach 2011 33 744 9 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577287

Back to article
16.
Donnon T Al Ansari A Al Alawi S Violato C The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review Acad Med 2014 89 511 6 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000147

Back to article

Evaluating clinicians’ teaching performance

Abstract

Paradigm

My account