Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Essential facets of competence that enable trust in medical graduates: a ranking study among physician educators in two countries Cover

Essential facets of competence that enable trust in medical graduates: a ranking study among physician educators in two countries

Open Access
|Oct 2013

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Levels of agreement according to De Loe [13]

Agreement

Calculation level of agreement 4-point scale according to De Loe

1 category

2 contiguous categories

High (%)

70

80

Medium (%)

60

70

Low (%)

50

60

None

<60 % of ratings in 2 contiguous categories

Table 2

Rank-order, median scores, mean scores and level-of-agreement concerning the importance of 25 FOCs for entrustment decisions, as judged by Dutch and German clinical educators

Facets of competence

Rank order

Dutch educators (N = 8)

German educators (N = 8)

Comb.

NL

GE

Ave.Mean

Median

Mean

SD

LoA

Median

Mean

SD

LoA

Scientifically and empirically grounded method of working

1

2

1

4.51

5.0

4.63

0.52

High

5.0

4.38

1.41

High

Knowing and maintaining own personal bounds and possibilities

2

3

3

4.32

5.0

4.63

0.52

High

4.0

4.00

0.93

Low

Active professional development

3

1

5

4.19

5.0

4.75

0.46

High

4.5

3.63

1.69

Low

Teamwork and collegiality

4

7

2

4.01

3.5

3.63

1.06

Low

4.5

4.38

0.74

High

Active listening to patients

5

4

4

3.94

4.0

4.00

0.93

Low

4.0

3.88

1.13

Low

Verbal communication with colleagues and supervisors

6

6

7

3.63

3.5

3.75

1.17

None

3.5

3.50

1.50

None

Empathy and openness

7

10

6

3.44

3.0

3.25

1.04

Low

3.5

3.63

1.30

None

Responsibility

8

5

10

3.38

4.0

3.75

1.39

Medium

3.0

3.00

1.93

None

Coping with mistakes

9

9

9

3.26

3.5

3.38

1.41

None

3.5

3.13

1.64

None

Safety and risk management

10

8

11

3.25

4.0

3.50

1.41

Low

3.0

3.00

1.41

Low

Written (and digital) account/report to colleagues and supervisors

11

11

15

2.94

3.5

3.13

1.13

Medium

3.0

2.75

1.67

None

Attention to individual patient background

12

15

16

2.82

2.5

2.88

1.36

None

3.0

2.75

1.04

Low

Respecting privacy and autonomy of the patient

13

13

17

2.82

2.5

3.00

1.15

None

2.5

2.63

1.30

None

Advising patients

14

14

18

2.75

2.5

3.00

1.20

Low

2.5

2.50

0.54

High

Handling emotions of patients and their relatives

15

12

21

2.69

3.0

3.00

1.20

Low

2.5

2.38

0.74

High

Structure, work planning and priorities

16

20

8

2.65

2.0

2.00

0.93

Medium

4.0

3.29

1.70

None

Ethical awareness

17

17

12

2.63

2.5

2.38

1.30

None

3.0

2.88

1.46

None

Continuity in the care process

18

16

19

2.63

3.0

2.75

1.28

Low

2.0

2.50

1.41

Low

Adapted informing of patients

19

19

13

2.51

2.0

2.13

1.13

Low

3.0

2.88

0.84

Medium

Attention to psychosocial aspects of health problems

20

18

22

2.38

2.0

2.38

1.19

Medium

2.0

2.38

1.19

Low

Active health promotion

21

24

14

2.32

1.5

1.75

0.89

Medium

3.0

2.88

1.25

Low

Financial and social awareness

22

23

20

2.16

1.0

1.88

1.64

High

2.0

2.43

1.51

None

Role differentiation

23

22

23

2.13

1.5

1.88

1.36

High

2.5

2.38

1.30

None

Coping with uncertainty

24

21

24

2.07

1.5

2.00

1.20

Low

1.0

2.13

1.55

Medium

Attention to relatives and caregivers

25

25

25

1.76

2.0

1.63

0.52

High

1.5

1.88

1.36

High

Language: English
Published on: Oct 19, 2013
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2013 Marjo Wijnen-Meijer, Kirstin Nillesen, Olle ten Cate, Marieke van der Schaaf, S. Harendza, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.