Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre Cover

Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre

Open Access
|Sep 2013

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Responses per division of employment, teaching load per division

UMCU divisions

Response (N = 306)

Teaching loada

Internal medicine and dermatology

43

+

Neuro sciences

34

+

Family medicine, public health and epidemiology

28

+

Education department

30

+

Surgical specialities

18

+

Paediatrics

39

Lab and pharmacy

26

Lung and cardiac specialities

14

Gynaecology, obstetrics and neonatology

13

Biomedical and genetic sciences

11

Perioperative and emergency care

11

Imaging

10

Division not mentioned

28

aUMCU divisions were grouped based on the number of paid teaching hours for the medical curriculum of 2009–2010. ‘+’ signifies a relatively high teaching load

Table 2

Mean scores on motivating factors to teaching (N = 306)

Ma

SD

Teaching about my own speciality

4.50

0.56

Noticeable appreciation for teaching from my direct superior

4.10

0.70

Teaching small groups (~12 students)

4.06

0.80

Feedback on my teaching performance

4.03

0.60

Freedom to determine what I teach

4.03

0.64

Noticeable appreciation for teaching of my immediate colleagues

3.99

0.67

Teaching in which the transfer of content is paramount

3.98

0.66

Freedom to determine how I teach

3.94

0.65

More secretarial assistance in my educational task

3.79

0.72

Teaching with colleagues from other disciplines

3.75

0.75

Numerical rating/scores from student evaluations

3.73

0.74

Give more publicity to good teachers

3.72

0.70

Financial reward for obtaining a teaching qualification

3.70

0.81

Feedback from other teachers or teacher teams

3.68

0.67

Easing procedures of basic and senior teaching qualification

3.63

0.84

Wider availability of teacher training

3.62

0.71

Teaching with emphasis of the learning process

3.57

0.96

More educational assistance from the UMCU Education department

3.54

0.69

The possibility of a teaching career

3.54

0.82

Teaching medium sized groups (about 40–60 students)

3.38

0.86

Teaching large groups (in the lecture hall)

3.30

0.94

Doing research and publishing on education

3.03

0.79

aValues: 1 (low) to 5 (high)

Table 3

Additional factors named to stimulate or hamper teaching motivation

Factors that stimulate my motivation for teaching

N

Factors that hamper my motivation for teaching

N

Motivated students

62

Unmotivated students

52

Acknowledgment for my teaching

33

Poor facilities

52

Adequate time planning of teaching

32

Too little time provided to properly teach

50

Clear organization and expectations

32

Bureaucracy and rules around teaching

51

Adequate teaching facilities

27

Not sufficiently familiar with content

15

Application of my content knowledge

24

Monotonous repeated group teaching

8

Receiving feedback on my teaching

23

Teaching fixed groups over time

17

Having personal contacts with students

17

Other items

29

Other items

74

Total

306

Total

292

Table 4

Mean work engagement scores of UMCU faculty for each of three tasks, related to their task combination of employment

Task combination

N

All work

Teaching

Research

Patient care

Teaching + research + patient care

151

4.24 (0.84)

3.58 (1.11)

3.65 (1.28)

4.43 (0.82)

Teaching + patient care

25

4.14 (0.85)

3.93 (1.01)

4.33 (1.05)

Teaching + research

67

4.35 (0.90)

3.78 (1.18)

4.34 (0.98)

Teaching

35

4.42 (0.84)

4.52 (0.82)

Overall average (SD)

4.26 (0.85)

3.78 (1.13)

3.87 (1.23)

4.42 (0.85)

Values: 1 (low) to 6 (high). Standard deviations between brackets

Table 5

Mean engagement scores of UMCU faculty for teaching, per division

UMCU divisions (names adapted for clarity)

N = 253

Teaching engagement

Education department

24

4.56 (0.89)

Gynaecology, obstetrics and neonatology

9

4.56 (0.79)

Imaging

9

4.14 (1.01)

Family medicine, public health and epidemiology

27

3.75 (1.23)

Biomedical and genetic sciences

11

3.72 (1.15)

Neuro sciences

31

3.71 (0.85)

Paediatrics

39

3.71 (1.29)

Lab and pharmacy

24

3.70 (1.18)

Lung and cardiac specialities

13

3.58 (1.15)

Internal medicine and dermatology

38

3.49 (1.04)

Surgical specialties

18

3.36 (1.16)

Perioperative and emergency care

10

3.29 (0.54)

Values: 1 (low) to 6 (high). Standard deviations between brackets

Language: English
Page range: 264 - 275
Published on: Sep 14, 2013
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2013 B. A. M. van den Berg, Arnold B. Bakker, Th. J. ten Cate, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.