Cultural Science

Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewers provide comment on the below topics and guidelines:

• Content: Does the article fit within the scope of the journal? Is the submission original, relevant, and rigorous? Is the author's depth of understanding of the issues researched adequate? Are the sources and references adequate? Has the existing knowledge base been explored and built upon? Are the chosen methodologies appropriate, and have they and the evidential base been used appropriately? Does the conclusion reflect the argument in the main body text and bring something new to the debate?
• Structure and argument: Does the abstract summarise the arguments succinctly and accurately? Is the manuscript logically structured, and do the arguments flow coherently? Is there enough reference to methodology in the introduction, and are the arguments fully evidenced and substantiated? Does the introduction logically signpost the arguments, and does the conclusion adequately summarise them?