Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Acta Politologica Cover

Acta Politologica

Open Access
0,7
CiteScore
Journal detailsArticles & issues

About the journal

Acta Politologica (AcPo) is a peer-reviewed political science journal published by the Institute of Political Studies at the Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University. It is also an official journal of the Czech Political Science Association....
View full aims & scope

Editor-in-chief

Miloš Brunclík, Charles University, Czech Republic
Managing Editor
View full editorial board

All volumes and issues in this journal

Open Access
|Apr 2025
Disproportionality, turnout, and the Spanish case. Another piece for the puzzle
Open Access
|Apr 2025
Separate opinions in the constitutional jurisdictions of the Baltic States: Applicants and politicization of judgments
Open Access
|Apr 2025
The 2021 elections to the Czech Chamber of Deputies against the background of the quality of life
Open Access
|Apr 2025
Gabriele Badano & Alasia Nuti: Politicizing Political Liberalism: On the Containment of Illiberal and Antidemocratic Views. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2024. ISBN 978-0-19-285931-0: A review
Open Access
|Dec 2024
Digital Membership and Activist Strategies in Spanish Non-Statewide Parties
Open Access
|Dec 2024
Editorial: The Digitalization of Intra Party Politics. The Participation vs. Centralisation Dilemma

Journal details

For reviewers

Peer reviewers assist the editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Any reviewer who feels unqualified to review the manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editors and excuse himself/herself from the review process. Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. It must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. 

Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editors‘ attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

eISSN: 1804-8220|ISSN: 1804-1302|Language: English|Publication timeframe: 2 times per year
Published by: Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services