Line Quality in Non-original Documents Expert Opinions and Conclusions
By: Paolo Vaccarone and Linton Mohammed
References
- ISO 19005-3:2012 - Document management— Electronic document file format for long-term preservation - Part 3: Use of ISO 32000-1 with support for embedded files (PDF/A-3) ISO 32000-2, Document Management Portable Document Format Part 2
- J.L Parker. PDF Technology Related Effects in Documents. ASQDE AGM 2.0 ver. 2021. The Future is Now, August 10-12, 2021;
- J.S. Kelly, M. Angel. Forensic Document Examination in the 21st Century, CRC Press 1st Edition, (2020), 211–223;
- P. Vaccarone, F. Dellavalle, A. Lvovskaya. Handwriting Pen Stroke Vs Magnetic Toner. Which one came first? ASQDE AGM August 10-14 2020.
- J.S. Kelly, M. Angel. Op. Cit., 252–254.
- ISO 5466:1996. Photography. Processed safety photographic films. Storage practices.
- R, Derrick Making Microfiche. A Guide to Equipment Choices for Establishing a Microfiche Production Facility. International Development Research Center. IDRC-MR199e - (1988).
- G.A. Hanna. Microfilm Documents: What Are the Boundaries in Document Examination? Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 33, n. 1 (1988), 154–166.
- M. Gupta. Forensic Examination of Source Media on Facsimile Generated Documents. ASQDE AGM 2.0 ver. 2021. The Future is Now. August 10-12, 2021;
- G.A. Dawson, B.S. Lindblom. An evaluation of line quality in photocopied signatures. Science & Justice, Vol. 38, (1998) 189–194.
- B. Found, D. Rogers. Investigating forensic document examiners’ skill relating to opinions on photocopied signatures. Science & Justice, Vol. 45, (2005) 200–206.
- Seaman, J. (1991). Facsimile documents: Feasibility for comparison. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Anaheim, CA.
- R.A. Huber, A.M. Headrick. Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. CRC Press; 1st edition (1999), 257–283.
- S.E. Morton. A Look at Newer Photocopiers. Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA, Vol. 34, No. 2 (1989), 461–467.
- SWGDOC Standard for Examination of Handwritten Items. Ver. 2013-1
- D. Ellen, S. Day, C. Davies. Scientific Examination of Documents Methods and Techniques. 4th edition. (2018), 56–57.
- S.K. Mishra. P. Sharma. M. Singh. O.P. Jasuja. What forensic information does a photocopier reproduction convey—Is it suitable and sufficient to lead an expert to a definite conclusion? Problems of Forensic Sciences. vol. 117, (2019), 19–36.
- K. Saini, A. Singh, The Evaluation of Handwriting Features in Photocopied Signatures. The Internet Journal of Forensic Science. Vol. 4 n. 1, (2008)
- SWGDOC Standard for Examination of Documents Produced with Liquid Ink Jet Technology. Ver. 2013-1
- SWGDOC Standard for Examination of Documents Produced with Toner Technology. Ver. 2013-1
- O.P. Jasuja, S.K. Mishra. M. Singh.. The effect of photocopier types on online quality features of handwriting in multi-generational photocopies. Nowa Kodyfikacja Prawa Karnego 59, (2021), 57–70
- Best Practice Manual for the Forensic Examination of Handwriting, ENFSI-BPM-FHX-01, Ed. 03, (2020).
https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/BPM-Handwriting-%E2%80%94-Edition-3.pdf , 9.7, 36.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.282 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 20
Published on: Jun 1, 2022
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Paolo Vaccarone, Linton Mohammed, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.