Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Understanding Sinosphere Characters through a Comparison of Korean, Chinese, and English Characters Cover

Understanding Sinosphere Characters through a Comparison of Korean, Chinese, and English Characters

Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. khukuklub Wc. Hunminjeonggeom2. 2, Hunminjeonggeom2. Wikimedia commons; 2013 [updated :October 1, 2013; accessed May 16, 2017]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HMJE_2-2.svg.
  2. Kim Hk. (2008). A comparative study of the lexicon of Chinese character in East Asia: For the lexicon of Chinese Character of Japanese(JC), Vietnamese(VC) and Korean(KC). Journal of Korean Society of Bilingualism.;Vol. 38, No. 1, pp 156158.
  3. Ku, J. E. (2013). A chronological study on horizontal-writing Hangul. Master’s thesis. Hongik University, Seoul, Korea. pp. 24.
  4. Morris RN. (2000) Forensic handwriting identification: fundamental concepts and principles. London (England): Academic press. pp. 69.
  5. Crown D, Shimaoka T. Examination of ideographic handwriting (Chinese and Japanese). Journal of Police Science and Administration. 1974. Vol.2, No.3, pp. 279283.
  6. Kelly JS, Lindblom BS. (2006). Scientific examination of questioned documents (Second Edition). Boca Raton: CRC press, pp. 6061.
  7. Linlin Z. (2009). A comparative study on Korean and Chinese name. Master’s thesis of Department of Korean language and literature. Chungnam national university, Daejeon, Korea. pp. 78.
  8. Lee K. (2009). Hangul interpretation and font design. Korea study information; 2009. pp. 317318.
  9. Koppenhaver KM. (2007) Forensic document examination: principles and practice. Totowa (New Jersey): Humana Press. pp. 108.
  10. Sang-su A. (2009). Textbook of Hangul design. Seoul (South Korea): AN graphic publishing. pp. 3032.
  11. Simons GF, Fenning CD, editors. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 20th edition. Dallas (Texas): SIL International; 2017. Online at: www.ethnologue.com/statistics/size. [updated 2017; accessed May 22, 2017].
  12. Koo B. (2008). Effect on readability by various stroke densities Hangul has. Archives of Design Research. Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 279288.
  13. Taylor I, Taylor MM. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Revised ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 26.
  14. Lee SH, Kim SK. (2010). A study on the design characteristics of a Hangul vertical writing in editorial design. Archives of Design Research. Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.281282.
  15. Leung SC, Tsui CK, Cheung WL, Chung MWL. (1985). A comparative approach to the examination of Chinese handwriting—the Chinese character. Journal of the Forensic Science Society. Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 255-267.
  16. Kim JH. (1996). Forgery and forensic document examination. Seoul (South Korea): Eduspa publishing. pp. 158161.
  17. Jung YW. (2008). A comparative research on the similarity of Roman fonts and Hangul fonts: focused on the readability in the case of mixing Roman fonts and Hangul fonts. Ansung (Korea), Hankyong National University publishing. pp.413.
  18. Nisbet RE. (2003). The geography of thought: how Asian and Westerners think differently and why. London: N. Brealey. pp. 175176.
  19. Huber RA, Headrick AM. (1999). Handwriting identification: facts and fundamentals. Boca Raton: CRC press. pp. 182.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.246 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 30
Published on: Jun 1, 2018
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Jinwoo Choi, Mijung Choi, Chris Anderson, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.