Kinematic Validation of FDE Determinations about Writership in Handwriting Examination: A Preliminary Study
References
- Kam, M., Wetstein, J., and Conn, R. (1994) Proficiency of professional document examiners in writer identification. J Forensic Sciences, 39: 5–14.
- Kam, M., Fielding, G., and Conn, R. (1997) Writer identification by professional document examiners. J Forensic Sciences, 42: 778–786.
- Kam, M. and Lin, E. (2003) Writer identification using hand-printed and non-hand-printed questioned documents. J Forensic Sciences, 2003; 48: 1391–1395.
- Kam, M., Abichandani, O., and Hewett, T. (2015) Simulation detection in handwritten documents by forensic document examiners. J Forensic Sciences 60: 936–941.
- Galbraith, O., Galbraith, C.S., and Galbraith, N.G. (1995) The principle of the Drunkards search as a proxy for scientific analysis: The misuse of handwriting test data in a law journal article. Int J Forensic Doc Examiners, 1:7–17.
- Sita, J., Found, B., and Rogers, D.K. (2002). Forensic handwriting examiners’ expertise for signature comparison. J Forensic Sciences, 47: 1–8.
- Bird, C., Found, B., and Rogers, D. (2010) Forensic document examiners’ skill in distinguishing between natural and disguised handwriting behaviors. J Forensic Sciences, 55: 1291–1295.
- SWGDOC (2016)
https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2016/10/26/swgdoc_standard_terminology_for_expressing_conclusions_of_forensic_document_examiners_150114.pdf (Last accessed on February 23, 2018) - Saks, M.J. and Koehler, J.J. (2005). The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science 309: 892–895
- van Galen, G. (1984). Structural complexity of motor patterns: A study on reaction times of handwritten letters. Psychological Research, 46:49–57
- van Gemmert, A. and van Galen, G. (1996).
Dynamical features of mimicking another person’s writing and signature . In: Simner, M.L., Leedham, C.G., & Thomassen, A.J.W.M. (Eds.), Handwriting and Drawing Research: Basic and Applied Issues: 459”471. Amsterdam: IOP Press. - Ostrum, B. and Tanaka, T. (2006) Another look at handwriting movement. J American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. 9:57–67.
- Mohammed, L., Found, B., Caligiuri, M., and Rogers, D. (2011). The Dynamic Character of Disguise Behavior for Text-Based, Mixed, and Stylized Signatures. J Forensic Sciences, vol. 56; S136–141.
- Caligiuri, M.P. and Mohammed, L.A. (2012)
The Neuroscience of Handwriting: Applications for Forensic Document Examination . CRC Press, Boca Raton; 247 pages - Caligiuri, M.P., Mohammed, L.A., Found, B. and Rogers, D. (2012) Nonadherence to the Isochrony Principle in Forged Signatures. Forensic Science International, 223: 228–232
- Mohammed, L., Found, B., Caligiuri, M., and Rogers, D. (2015). Dynamic Characteristics of Signatures: Effects of Writer Style on Genuine and Simulated Signatures. J Forensic Sciences, 60: 8994.
- Caligiuri, M.P., Chi, K., and Landy, K.M. (2014). Kinematic Analyses of Signature Writing in Healthy Aging. J Forensic Sciences, 59:1020–4
- Teulings, H.-L. and Schomaker, L. (1993). Invariant properties between stroke features in handwriting. Acta Psychol. 82: 69–88
- Report on Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature Comparison Methods on September 20, 2016.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf (Last accessed on February 23, 2018) - Plamondon, R., and Djioua, M. (2006). A multilevel representation paradigm for handwriting stroke generation. Human Movement Science, 25:586–607.
- Thomassen, A.J.W.M., and Van Galen, G.P. (1992).
Handwriting as a motor task: Experimentation, modeling and simulation . In Approaches to the Study of Motor control and Learning Ed. J.J. Summers pp 113–144. Amsterdam: North Holland. - Found, B. (1997). The forensic analysis of behavioral artefacts: Investigations of theoretical and analytical approaches to handwriting identification. Unpublished doctoral thesis, La Trobe University.
- Adam, C. (2016) Forensic Evidence in Court: Evaluation and Scientific Opinion. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, UK.
- Robertson, B., Vignaux, G.A., and Berger, C.E.H. (2016)
Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom . 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, UK.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.243 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 12
Published on: Jun 1, 2018
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2018 Michael Caligiuri, Linton Mohammed, Brenda Lanners, Gina Hunter, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.