Kinematic Models of Subjective Complexity in Handwritten Signatures
References
- Found, B. and Rogers, D. (1999). Documentation of Forensic Handwriting Comparison and Identification Method: A Modular Approach. Journal of Forensic Document Examiners, Vol. 12, pp. 1–68.
- Sita, J., Found, B., and Rogers, D. (2002). Forensic Handwriting Examiners’ Expertise for Signature Comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 5.
- Merlino, M. (2015). Validity, Reliability, Accuracy, and Bias in Forensic Signature Identification, final report for the National Institute of Justice grant, available at
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/248565.pdf - Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination, Standard for Examination of Handwritten Items, available at
http://www. swgdoc.org/index.php/standards/publishedstandards . - Osborn, A. S. (1929) Questioned Documents. Albany, NY: Boyd Printing Company, p. 209.
- Harrison, W. (1966). Suspect Documents: Their Scientific Examination. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers, p. 413.
- Brault, J. and Plamondon, R. (1993). A Complexity Measure of Handwritten Curves: Modeling of Dynamic Signature Forgery. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 400–413.
- Found, B., Rogers, D., Rowe, V. and Dick, D. (1998). Statistical Modelling of Experts’ Perceptions of the Ease of Signature Simulation. Journal of Forensic Document Examiners, Vol. 11, pp. 73–99.
- Alewijnse, L., Van Den Heuvel, C., Stoel, R., and Franke, K. (2011). Analysis of Signature Complexity. Journal of Forensic Document Examiners, Vol. 21.
- Strach, S., Novotny, M., Devlin, A., Graydon, C., and Westwood, P. (2016). Development of a Draft Methodology for Electronic Signature Examination using Wacom Signature Scope. Presented at the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners.
- Ostrum, R.B. and Tanaka, T. (2006). Another Look at Handwriting Movement. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 57–69.
- Mohammed, L., Found, B., Caligiuri, M., and Rogers, D. (2015). Dynamic Characteristics of Signatures: Effects of Writer Style on Genuine and Simulated Signatures. Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 60, pp. 89–94.
- Teulings, H.-L. and Schomaker, L. (1993). Invariant Properties Between Stroke Features in Handwriting. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 82, pp. 69–88.
- National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council,
Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community , 2009. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. National Academies Press. - Kam, M., Fielding, G., and Conn, R. (1997). Writer Identification by Professional Document Examiners. Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 778–786.
- Sita, J., Found, B., and Rogers, D. (2002). Forensic Handwriting Examiners’ Expertise for Signature Comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp.1117–1124.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.239 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 10
Published on: Dec 1, 2017
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2017 Miriam Angel, Michael P. Caligiuri, Melvin Cavanaugh, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.