Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Blind Study on the Reliability of Hand Printing Identification by Forensic Document Examiners Cover

A Blind Study on the Reliability of Hand Printing Identification by Forensic Document Examiners

Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. Osborn, Albert S. Questioned Documents, Second Edition, (p374), Nelson-Hall Co., 1929
  2. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules (1972) http://federalevidence.com/advisory-committeenotes/FRE.702
  3. United States v. Prime, 431 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2005)
  4. SWGDOC Standard for Examination of Handwritten Items. http://swgdoc.org/index.php/standards/published-standards
  5. http://www.justice.gov/ust/kuhmo-tire-andadmissibility-expert-testimony
  6. National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.
  7. AAFS—American Academy of Forensic Science (QD Section), ABFDE – American Board of Forensic Document Examiners, ASQDE – American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, MAAFS— Mid-Atlantic Association of Forensic Scientists, SWAFDE—Southwestern Association of Forensic Document Examiners, and ASFDE – Australasian Society of Forensic Document Examiners
  8. While not all FDE’s use the nine-point scale and opt for a more abbreviated version, this scale provides the broadest range of levels of confidence choices for those who are accustomed to using it.
  9. This service has been discontinued.
  10. Of the 53 participants, 52 indicated that they use the same protocol to identify both hand printing and cursive.
  11. Osborn, Albert S. Questioned Documents, A Study of Questioned Documents with an Outline of Methods by Which the Fact May Be Discovered and Shown. The Lawyers’ Co-operative Publishing Co., 1910.
  12. Harrison, Wilson R. Suspect Documents, Their Scientific Examination. Frederick A. Praeger, Publishers, 1958.
  13. Hilton, Ordway Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents, Revised Edition. CRC Press, LLC, 1993.
  14. Huber, Roy & Headrick, A.M. Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. CRC Press, 1999.
  15. Kelly, Jan Seaman & Lindblom, Brian S. Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents, Second Edition. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006
  16. Schuetzner, Ellen Mulcrone. Class Characteristics of Hand Printing, The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Inc. 1999.
  17. As specified in our qualification for study participants.
  18. Merlino, M.L., Freeman, T.M., Dahir, B., Springer, V., Hammond, D., Dyer, A.D., & Found, B.J. (2012). Reliability and validity in forensic document examination: A demonstration and discussion of eye-tracking output. Paper presented at the Annual General Meetig of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Charleston, SC. Abstract retrieved from http://www.asqde. org/AGM/previous_meetings/programs_and_ abstracts/2012Abstracts.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.229 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 31
Published on: Jun 1, 2016
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Linda L. Mitchell, Mara Merlino, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.