Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Are Simple Signatures So Easy to Simulate? Cover
Open Access
|Dec 2013

References

  1. Alewinjse, L.C.; Van Den Heuvel, C.E.; Stoel R.D.; and Franke, K. (2009). Analysis of signature complexity. In: Advances on Graphonomics: Proceedings of IGS.
  2. Al-Musa Alkahtani, A.; Platt, A.W.G. (2010) A statistical Study of the relative Difficulty of freehand Simulation of Form, Proportion, and Line Quality in Arabic Signatures. Science and Justice, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 7276.
  3. Balbuena Balmaceda, J.L. (1985). La signature authentique et ses modifications. Revue Internationale de Police Criminelle, vol. 388, pp. 114126.
  4. Benedetto, P. (1990). La sécurité des signatures comme moyen d’identification. Séminaire IPSC Université de Lausanne.
  5. Black, A.J. (1995). Simulated Signatures- Forgery by Imitation, Journal of Forensic Identification, vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 283297.
  6. Black, D; Found, B; and Rogers, D. (2003). The Frequency of the Occurrence of Handwriting Performance Features used to predict whether Questioned Signatures are simulated. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, vol. 15, pp. 1728.
  7. Black, D.A. (1963). Forged Signatures more skillfully written than the true Signatures. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 109112.
  8. Brault, J.J.; and Plamondon, R. (1993). A complexity Measure of Handwritten Curves: Modeling of Dynamic Signature Forgery. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 400413.
  9. Brewester, F. (1932). Contested Documents and Forgeries. Calcutta: The book company.
  10. Buglio, J.; and Gidion, H.M. (August 1997). Another adept Penman? Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, San Francisco.
  11. Conway, J. (1982). Authenticity v. simulation. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Boston.
  12. Dewhurst, T.; Found, B.; and Rogers D. (2008). Are Expert Penmen better than Lay People at producing Simulations of Model Signature? Forensic Science International, vol. 180, pp. 5053.
  13. ENFSI. The Hague: European Network of Forensic Science Institutes; 2004. European Network of Forensic Handwriting Experts (ENFHEX). Analyse d’écriture manuscrite.
  14. Found, B.; and Rogers, D. (2003). The initial profiling Trial of a Program to characterize forensic Handwriting Examiners’ skill. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 7281.
  15. Found, B.; and Rogers D. (1998a) A Consideration of the theoretical Basis of forensic Handwriting Examination: The Application of “Complexity Theory” to understanding the Basis of Handwriting Identification. International Journal of Forensic Document Examiners, vol. 4, pp. 109118.
  16. Found, B.; Rogers, D.; and Herkt, A. (2001). The Skill of a Group of Forensic Document Examiners in expressing Handwriting and Signature Authorship and Production Process Opinions. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, vol. 14, pp. 1530.
  17. Found, B.; Rogers, D.; and Metz, H. (1999). The objective static Analysis of spatial Errors in Simulations. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, vol. 12, pp. 8199.
  18. Found, B.; Rogers, D.; Rowe, V.; and Dick, D. (1998b). Statistical Modelling of Experts’ Perceptions of the Ease of Signature Simulation. Journal of Forensic Document Examination, vol. 11, pp. 7399.
  19. Found, B.; and Rogers, D. The Forensic Investigation of Signature Complexity. In: Simner, M.L.; Leedham, C.G.; and Thomasen, A.J.W.M. (1996). Handwriting and Drawing Research: Basic and Applied Issues. IOS Press, pp. 483492.
  20. Found, B.; and Rogers, D. (2008). The probative character of Forensic Handwriting Examiners’ Identification and elimination Opinions on Questioned Signatures. Forensic Science International, vol. 178, pp. 5460.
  21. Gek Kwee, L.; Bei Sing, Y.; Chiew Yung, Y.; Lee Tiang, L.; Sock Kim, T.; and Koon Puay T. (2006) A Study on the Levels of Difficulty in the Simulation of individual Characteristics in a Signature. Journal of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 2936.
  22. Harrison, W.R. (1966). Suspect Documents: Their Scientific Examination. Second Impression with Supplement. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  23. Hayoz, P. (2003). Imitation parfaite de signature- réalité ou utopie? Séminaire IPSC Université de Lausanne.
  24. Herkt, A. (1986). Signature disguise or signature forgery? Journal of Forensic Science Society, vol. 26, pp. 257266.
  25. Hilton, O. (1982). Scientific Examination of Questioned Documents. Revised Edition. New York: Elsevier.
  26. Horan, J.J. (1985). The size of Forged Signatures. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Chicago.
  27. Huber, R.A.; and Headrick, A.M. (1999). Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  28. Lee, F.L.J. (1998). An addition to the fraternity of adept penman. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Indianapolis.
  29. Leung, S.C.; Cheng, Y.S.; Fung, H.T.; and Poon, N.L. (1993). Forgery I–Simulation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA, vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 402412.
  30. Mathyer, J. (1960). Expertise des signatures. Revue Internationale de Criminologie et Police Technique, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 133148.
  31. McCarthy, J.F.(1984). Two Penmen’s Ability in Simulation Signatures, Presented at the Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences, Oxford.
  32. Osborn, A.S. (1929). Questioned Documents. Second Edition. Albany, NY: Boyd Printing Company.
  33. Sita, J.; Found, B.; and Rogers, D.K. (2002). Forensic Handwriting Examiners’ Expertise for Signature Comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 11171124.
  34. Totty, R.N. (1995). Skilled copies of signatures. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, Chicago.
  35. Zappitelli, M. (2000). Imitazione perfetta della firma? Scrittura, vol. 116, pp. 2834.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69525/jasqde.197 | Journal eISSN: 1524-7287
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 11
Published on: Dec 1, 2013
Published by: American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Liv Cadola, Pierre Margot, Raymond Marquis, published by American Society of Questioned Document Examiners
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.