Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘She Had No Say’: Moral Disengagement and Empathy Explored Through Shared Reading Cover

‘She Had No Say’: Moral Disengagement and Empathy Explored Through Shared Reading

By:   
Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Andersen, T. R. (2022). Regaining autonomy, competence, and relatedness: Experiences from two Shared Reading groups for people diagnosed with cancer. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1017166. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017166
  2. Andeweg, A., Linden, S., & Bastemeijer, L. (2025). What Shared Reading Can Do: A Review of the Literature. Narrative Works, 14(1), 83110. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/NW/article/view/35730.
  3. Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
  4. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101119. 10.1080/0305724022014322
  5. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364374. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
  6. Bingham, A.J., & Witkowsky, P. (2022). Deductive and inductive approaches to qualitative data analysis. In C. Vanover, P. Mihas, & J. Saldaña (Eds.), Analyzing and interpreting qualitative data: After the interview (pp. 133146). SAGE Publications.
  7. Breen, R. L. (2006) A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(3), 463475. 10.1080/03098260600927575
  8. Canning, P. (2017). Text world theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison. Language and Literature, 26(2), 172187. 10.1177/0963947017704731
  9. Christiansen, C. E. (2023). Does fiction reading make us better people? Empathy and morality in a literary empowerment programme. Ethnos, 88(5), 9941013. 10.1080/00141844.2021.2007158
  10. De Jonge, J., Demichelis, S., Rebora, S., & Salgaro, M. (2022). Operationalizing perpetrator studies. Focusing readers’ reactions to The Kindly Ones by Jonathan Littell. Journal of Literary Semantics, 51(2), 147161. 10.1515/jls-2022-2057
  11. Ditlevsen, T. (2022). The trouble with happiness. (M. F. Goldman, Trans). Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1963)
  12. Ditlevsen, T. (2023). Kwaad Geluk. (L. Post-Oostenbrink, Trans). Das Mag. (Original work published in 1963)
  13. Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Report, 23(11), 28502861. 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
  14. Hakemulder, F. (2000). The Moral Laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/upal.34
  15. Janicke, S. H., & Raney, A. A. (2018). Modeling the antihero narrative enjoyment process. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 533546. 10.1037/ppm0000152
  16. Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the Novel. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001
  17. Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2005). Some like it bad: Testing a model for perceiving and experiencing fictional characters. Media Psychology, 7(2), 107144. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_1
  18. Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay, M. (2011). The role of moral disengagement in the enjoyment of real and fictional characters. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4(1), 90101. 10.1504/IJART.2011.037772
  19. Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2013). What makes characters’ bad behaviors acceptable? The effects of character motivation and outcome on perceptions, character liking, and moral disengagement. Mass Communication and Society, 16(2), 179199. 10.1080/15205436.2012.690926
  20. Nyumba, T.O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2017). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 2032. 10.1111/2041-210X.12860
  21. Salgaro, M., & Van Tourhout, B. (2018). Why does Frank Underwood look at us? Contemporary heroes suggest the need of a turn in the conceptualization of fictional empathy. Journal of Literary Theory, 12(2), 345368. 10.1515/jlt-2018-0019
  22. Sanders, M. S., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2016). Beyond heroes and villains: Examining explanatory mechanisms underlying moral disengagement. Mass Communication and Society, 19(3), 230252, 10.1080/15205436.2015.1096944
  23. Shen, L. (2010). On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, 74(5), 504524. 10.1080/10570314.2010.512278
  24. Skjerdingstad, K. I., & Tangerås, T. M. (2019). Shared reading as an affordance-nest for developing kinesic engagement with poetry: A case study. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 6(1). 10.1080/23311983.2019.1688631
  25. The Reader. (2019). Stronger Foundations for the Future: Growing Shared Reading with Support from the Second Half Fund. The Reader, Org. https://www.thereader.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Stronger-Foundations-For-The-Future-The-Readers-Second-Half-Fund-Repo....pdf.
  26. Tsay, M., & Krakowiak K. M. (2011). The impact of perceived character similarity and identification on moral disengagement. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 14(1), 102110. 10.1504/IJART.2011.037773
  27. Zillmann, D. (1994). Mechanisms of emotional involvement with drama. Poetics, 23(1–2), 3351. 10.1016/0304-422X(94)00020-7
  28. Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture and the mind (pp. 5363). University of Luton Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.209 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 96
Submitted on: Aug 5, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2026
Published on: May 7, 2026
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Julia de Jonge, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.