Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘She Had No Say’: Moral Disengagement and Empathy Explored Through Shared Reading Cover

‘She Had No Say’: Moral Disengagement and Empathy Explored Through Shared Reading

By:   
Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Focus-group interview questions.

Opening questionWhat do you think of the story we have just read?
Introductory questionsWhat do you think about the young pregnant woman?
Transition questionsHow do you feel about the young pregnant woman’s attitude towards her husband and the estate agent?
How do you feel about the young pregnant woman’s attitude towards the woman selling her house?
Moral Disengagement questionsDo you think the young pregnant woman is justified in not speaking up? (and why/how?)Moral justification
Do you think the young pregnant woman can be held responsible for the uncomfortable business practices? (and why/how?)Displacement of responsibility; diffusion of responsibility
What do you think the consequences are of the young pregnant woman’s silence? (Could this be different if she spoke up?)Disregard or distortion of consequences
Do you think the woman who sells her house deserves the treatment she is getting from the young couple and the estate agent? (and why/how?)Dehumanization
Do you think the woman who sells the house is to blame for the uncomfortable business practices? Perhaps partly? (and why/how?)Attribution of blame
Do you think the young pregnant woman has less responsibility than her husband and the estate agent? (and why/how?)Advantageous comparison
Closing questionFinally, is there anything connected with your feelings towards the young pregnant woman that has not been discussed that you feel strongly about and would like to bring up now?
Table 2

Coding scheme.

Moral justificationRedefining immoral conduct into something neglectable or worthy
Euphemistic labelingLanguage is used to minimize the immorality of the act
Advantageous comparisonMinimizing the severity of the immoral act by comparing it to something that is presumably more immoral or comparing the perpetrator of the immoral act to someone presumably more immoral
Displacement of responsibilitySomeone or something else is held responsible for the immoral act
Diffusion of responsibilityResponsibility for the immoral act is diminished through division of labor
Disregard or distortion of consequencesConsequences of the immoral act are minimized, disbelieved, or ignored
Attribution of blameVictim is blamed for what is inflicted upon them
DehumanizationLanguage is used to portray the victim of the immoral act as sub-human
EmpathyExpressions of recognition, affect, and identification
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.209 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 96
Submitted on: Aug 5, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2026
Published on: May 7, 2026
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Julia de Jonge, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.