Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implicit Messages of Narratives and Evaluative Text Structures: A Network-Based Approach Cover

Implicit Messages of Narratives and Evaluative Text Structures: A Network-Based Approach

By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2026

References

  1. Andriga, E. (1994). Wandel der Interpretation. Kafkas “Vor dem Gesetz” im Spiegel der Literaturwissenschaft. Springer.
  2. Appel, M. (2022). Affective Resistance to Narrative Persuasion. Journal of Business Research, 149, 8509. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.001
  3. Bagrow, J. P., & Bollt, E. M. (2019). An Information-Theoretic, All-scales Approach to Comparing Networks. Applied Network Science, 4(1), 45. 10.1007/s41109-019-0156-x
  4. Beardsley, M. C. (1958). Aesthetics. Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York and Burlingame: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
  5. Benamara, F., Taboada, M., & Mathieu, Y. (2017). Evaluative Language Beyond Bags of Words: Linguistic Insights and Computational Applications. Computational Linguistics, 43(1), 20164. 10.1162/COLI_a_00278
  6. Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2013). Narrative persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., (pp. 20019). Sage Publications, Inc. 10.4135/9781452218410.n13
  7. Booth, W. C. (1961 [1983]). The Rhetoric of Fiction. University of Chicago Press.
  8. Brasch, A. S. (2017). Moderne - Regeneration - Erlösung. Der Begriff der “Kolonie” und die weltanschauliche Literatur der Jahrhundertwende. V & R unipress.
  9. Coll Ardanuy, M., & Sporleder, C. (2015). Clustering of Novels Represented as Social Networks. Journal of Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 12(4), 133. 10.33011/lilt.v12i.1379
  10. Dimpel, F. M. (2018). Axiologische Dissonanzen: Widersprüchliche Aspekte der evaluativen Struktur in “Der feige Ehemann” und in “Drei Mönche von Kolmar. Beiträge zur mediävistischen Erzählforschung, 1, 12356. 10.25619/BmE2018111.
  11. Folde, C. (2021). Exploring Fictional Truth. Content, Interpretation, and Narration. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann. 10.5771/9783465145622
  12. Gabriel, G. (2010). Der Erkenntniswert der Literatur. In J. Urbich & A. Löck (Eds.), Der Begriff der Literatur, (pp. 24762). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110225488.247
  13. García-Carpintero, M. (2020). Assertion and Fiction. In S. C. Goldberg (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Assertion (pp. 43758). Oxford University Press.
  14. Gittel, B. (2023). »Der Roman zeigt, dass …«: Implizite literarische Assertionen, Weltanschauungen und ideologiekritische Interpretationen. Scientia Poetica, 27(1), 147176. 10.1515/scipo-2023-006
  15. Gittel, B. (2025). Evaluative Structures in Narrative Fiction (1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.16570556
  16. Gittel, B. (forthcoming). Annotationsrichtlinien für Evaluative Textstrukturen: Literarische Wertungen, Codierungen, und Oppositionen.
  17. Gius, E., & Jacke, J. (2017). The Hermeneutic Profit of Annotation. On Preventing and Fostering Disagreement in Literary Text Analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 11(2), 23354. 10.3366/ijhac.2017.0194
  18. Grätz, K. (2016). „Die Neger erobern Europa“. Primitivismus und Kulturkritik in der urbanen Moderne. In O. Agard & B. Beßlich (Eds.), Kulturkritik zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich (1890–1933) (pp. 7589). Peter Lang.
  19. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 31541). Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410606648
  20. Greimas, A. J. (1983 [1966]). Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Translated by McDowell, D., Schleifer, R., and Velie, A. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  21. Hobson, D., et al. (2024). Story Morals: Surfacing value-driven narrative schemas using large language models. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1299813032). Miami. 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.723
  22. Hospers, J. (1960). Implied Truths in Literature. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 29(1), 3746. 10.1111/1540_6245.jaac19.1.0037
  23. Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1986). Evaluations in literary reading. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 6(1), 5372. 10.1515/text.1.1986.6.1.53
  24. Keunen, B. (2013). Plot, Morality, and Folk Psychology Research. In L. Bernaerts, D. de Geest, L. Herman, & B. Vervaeck (Eds.), Stories and Minds. Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative (pp. 17598). University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1ddr7zh.12
  25. Klie, J.-C., et al. (2018). The INCEpTION Platform: Machine-Assisted and Knowledge-Oriented Interactive Annotation. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 59). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/C18-2002.
  26. Krah, H. (2015). Einführung in die Literaturwissenschaft/Textanalyse (2nd ed.). Ludwig Verlag.
  27. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.
  28. Lamarque, P., & Olsen, S. H. (1994). Truth, Fiction, and Literature. A Philosophical Perspective. Oxford University Press.
  29. King, M. (2012). Fabulous Microbes. On Tuberculosis, Syphilis and Creativity. Myths in Literature around 1900. Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift, 62(1), 7392.
  30. Lindner, M. (1994). Leben in der Krise: Zeitromane der Neuen Sachlichkeit und die intellektuelle Mentalität der klassischen Moderne. Metzler. 10.1007/978-3-476-03530-1
  31. Lotman, J. M. (1977 [1970]). The Structure of the Artistic Text. Translated by Lenhoff, G., and Vroon, R. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  32. Mathet, Y., Widlöcher, A., & Métivier, J.-P. (2015). The Unified and Holistic Method Gamma (γ) for Inter-annotator Agreement Measure and Alignment. Computational Linguistics, 41(3), 43779. 10.1162/COLI_a_00227
  33. Mikkonen, J. (2010). Implicit Assertions in Literary Fiction. Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, 2, 31230.
  34. Müller, W. G. (2010). Die ethische Dimension der Literatur – am Beispiel des Versuchs der Grundlegung einer Ethik des Erzählens. In A. Löck & J. Urbich (Ed.), Der Begriff der Literatur. Transdisziplinäre Perspektiven (pp. 451468). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110225488.451
  35. Nabholz, A.-C. (2004). The Crisis of Modernity: Culture, Nature, and the Modernist Yearning for Authenticity. Dissertation, Basel. https://edoc.unibas.ch/639/1/DissB_7969.pdf (Accessed: 18 December 2024).
  36. Park, M., Park, S., & Shin, H. (2022). Literature Representation using Character Networks based on Sentiment Analysis. In IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) (pp. 190193). 10.1109/BigComp54360.2022.00044
  37. Petraschka, T. (2014). Interpretation und Rationalität. Billigkeitsprinzipien in der philologischen Hermeneutik. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110351163
  38. Phelan, J. (2005). Living to Tell about It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. Cornell University Press.
  39. Phelan, J., & Martin, M. P. (1999). The Lessons of Weymouth: Homodiegesis, Unreliability, Ethics, and The Remains of the Day. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis (pp. 88109). Ohio State University Press.
  40. Prinz, K. (2019). Systematische Grundlagen der literaturwissenschaftlichen Wertanalyse – mit einer Beispielanalyse zu Schillers “Verbrecher aus verlorener Ehre”. In R. Verwiebe (Ed.), Werte und Wertebildung aus interdisziplinärer Perspektive (pp. 11736). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-658-21976-5_6
  41. Prinz, K. (2020). Helden und Verbrecher. Herausforderungen der wert- und normbezogenen Erzähltextanalyse. Erich Schmidt Verlag. 10.37307/b.978-3-503-19129-1
  42. Prinz, K., & Winko, S. (2013). Wie rekonstruiert man Wertungen und Werte in literarischen Texten? In G. Rippl & S. Winko (Eds.), Handbuch Kanon und Wertung. Theorien, Instanzen, Geschichte (pp. 4027). J. B. Metzler.
  43. Sarajlić, A., et al. (2016). Graphlet-based Characterization of Directed Networks. Sci Rep, 6, 35098. 10.1038/srep35098
  44. Sayre-McCord, G. (2023). Moral Realism. In N. Edward, Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/moral-realism/.
  45. Sirridge, M. J. (1980). The Moral of the Story: Exemplification and the Literary Work. Philosophical Studies, 38, 391402. 10.1007/BF00419338
  46. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment—Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion. Communication theory, 12(2), 17391. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
  47. Snijders, T. (2012). Transitivity and Triads. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/Trans_Triads_ha.pdf.
  48. Stierle, K. (1973). Geschichte als Exemplum – Exemplum als Geschichte. Zur Pragmatik und Poetik narrativer Texte. In R. Koselleck & W.-D. Stempel (Eds.), Geschichte, Ereignis und Erzählung (pp. 347376). Fink.
  49. Sukalla, F. (2023). Narrative Persuasion – theoretische Ansätze und empirische Ergebnisse zur Überzeugungskraft von Narrationen. Soziale Passagen, 15(1), 2337. 10.1007/s12592-023-00458-4
  50. Tantardini, M., et al. (2019). Comparing Methods for Comparing Networks. Sci Rep, 9, 17557. 10.1038/s41598-019-53708-y
  51. Titzmann, M. (2003). Semiotische Aspekte der Literaturwissenschaft: Literatursemiotik. In R. Posner, et al. (Eds.), Semiotics: A Handbook on the Sign-theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture (pp. 3028103). Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110194159-028
  52. Thesing, B. (2021). “Daß das Leben lebbar wird nur durch gültige Bindungen”. Hugo von Hofmannsthals Schrifttumsrede im Lichte neoidealistischer Kulturkritik. In W. Kunicki, N. Żarska & K. Żarski (Eds.), Die Literatur der Konservativen Revolution. Schreiben zwischen Traditionalismus und Avantgarde (pp. 225240). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 10.13109/9783666360961.225
  53. Tuna, E. H. (2024). Imaginative Resistance. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/imaginative-resistance/.
  54. Väyrynen, P. (2021). Thick Ethical Concepts. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/thick-ethical-concepts/.
  55. von Graevenitz, G. (1998). Einleitung. In Graevenitz, G. von (Ed.), Konzepte der Moderne. DFG-Symposion 1997 (pp. 116). J. B. Metzler.
  56. Walton, K. L., & Tanner, M. (1994). Morals in Fiction and Fictional Morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 68, 2766. 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/68.1.27
  57. Winko, S. (1991). Wertungen und Werte in Texten: Axiologische Grundlagen und literaturwissenschaftliches Rekonstruktionsverfahren. Vieweg. 10.1007/978-3-322-86423-9
  58. Zymner, R. (1991). Uneigentlichkeit. Studien zu Semantik und Geschichte der Parabel. Schöningh.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.207 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 21
Submitted on: Jul 28, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 11, 2025
Published on: Jan 6, 2026
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Benjamin Gittel, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.