Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘TL;DR’ (Too Long; Didn’t Read)? Cognitive Patience as a Mode of Reading: Exploring Concentration and Perseverance Cover

‘TL;DR’ (Too Long; Didn’t Read)? Cognitive Patience as a Mode of Reading: Exploring Concentration and Perseverance

Open Access
|Oct 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Items ‘Concentration & perseverance.’

ITEMORIGIN
“I am able to pay attention to fine detail”Attention Questionnaire (AQ), Scale 1 (Schepers 2007), Dimension ‘Concentration Ability’
“I am able to return full attention to something after a short interruption”AQ
“I am able to concentrate on more than one thing at the same time”AQ
“I sometimes miss vital information during a boring lecture”AQ
“I become shut off from the world around me when trying to solve a challenging problem”AQ
“I am able to isolate from my surroundings when studying”AQ
“I am able to shut off from the world when reading an absorbing book”AQ
“I am able to pay attention to one specific issue for a long period of time”AQ
“I am able to give continuous attention, even if the volume of information is very large”AQ
“I finish whatever I begin”Short Grit scale (Grit-S: Duckworth and Quinn, 2009; Lechner, Danner, & Rammstedt 2019), Dimension ‘Perseverance’
“Setbacks don’t discourage me”Grit-S
“I am diligent. I never give up”Grit-S
“When I am working on an engaging task I sometimes forget the time”Own addition
“I have difficulty focusing on more than one thing”Ibid.
“I am often bored”Ibid.
Table 3

Factor analysis concentration & persistence.

ITEMSUST. ATT & PERSEVERANCEABSORPTIONDIFFICULTY WITH MULTITASKING
I have difficulty focusing on more than one thing.824
When I am working on an engaging task I sometimes forget the time.681
I am able to isolate from my surroundings when studying.611
Setbacks don’t discourage me. I don’t give up easily..694
I am able to shut off from the world when reading an absorbing book.752
I am able to pay attention to one specific issue for a long period of time.525.534
I am able to pay attention to fine detail.516
I finish whatever I begin.727
I am able to give continuous attention, even if the volume of information is very large.568
I am able to concentrate on more than one thing at the same time.788
I am diligent. I never give up..788
I become shut off from the world around me when trying to solve a challenging problem.669

[i] Factor loadings based on a Principal Component analysis with Varimax with Kaiser Normalization rotation for 15 items on concentration and persistence.

Note: Factor loadings < .5 are suppressed.

Table 2

Reading motivation.

ITEMADAPTED FROM
“I liked it because it had an unexpected ending”Literary Response Questionnaire (Miall & Kuiken 1995) (adapted), factor ‘story-driven reading’
“I liked it because there was a lot of action”Ibid.
“I liked it because of the surprising plot twists”Ibid.
“I liked it because I could empathize with the characters”(Koopman 2015a; adapted from Busselle and Bilandzic 2009), dimension ‘absorption/empathy’
“I liked it because the book touches me emotionally”Ibid.
“I liked it because I was absorbed in the narrative world”Ibid.
“I liked it because the book was beautifully written”(Koopman 2015a), dimension ‘style’
“I liked it because the book was originally written”Ibid.
“I liked it because there are sentences in the book that stayed with me”Ibid.
“I liked it because it was an easy read”Own addition
“I liked it because it was a challenging read”Ibid.
“I liked it because it was a ‘pageturner’”Ibid.
“I liked it because it gave me new knowledge and/or insights into society”Ibid.
“I liked it because it gave me knowledge about the world”Ibid.
“I liked it because of how realistic it was”Ibid.
Table 4

Factor analysis reading motivation.

ITEMREADING FOR PLOTIMMERSIONAESTHETICSKNOWLEDGE
I liked it because it had an unexpected ending.681
I liked it because it was beautifully written.620
I liked it because it was an easy read–.474
I liked it because it gave me new knowledge and/or insights into society.869
I liked it because there was a lot of action.735
I liked it because I could empathize with the characters.741
I liked it because there are sentences in the book that stayed with me.560
I liked it because I was absorbed in the narrative world.483
I liked it because it gave me knowledge about the world.883
I liked it because it was a challenging read.566
I liked it because of the surprising plot twists.748
I liked it because it was originally written.683
I liked it because of how realistic it was.555
I liked it because it was a ‘pageturner’.582
I liked it because the book touches me emotionally.662

[i] Factor loadings based on a Principal Component analysis with Varimax with Kaiser Normalization rotation for 15 items on textual preferences.

Note: Factor loadings < .4 are suppressed.

Table 5

Correlations, means (M), and standard deviations for the main variables.

VARIABLEMSD123456789101112
1. ART16.478.88
2. Sustained attention & perseverance3.83.69.169**
3. Difficulty with multitasking3.041.08–.051.280**
4. Absorption4.14.63.104**.485**.124**
5. Frequency5.742.60.319**.134**.072*.112**
6. Length6.122.44.339**.312**.015.208**.144**
7. Skimming1.88.73–.119**–.123**–.006–.041–.210**–.067
8. Skipping1.49.61–.096**–.146**–.019–.061–.131–.132.511**
9. Reading for the plot3.29.84–.139**.118*.047.054–.013.095**.041.012
10. Reading for immersion4.21.60.063.071–.063.066.074*.148**.027–.036.262**
10. Reading for aesthetics3.70.63.133**.197**.083*.168**.178**–.039–.045–.017.024.049
11. Reading for knowledge3.99.98.042.107**–.020.093**.050–.038–.023–.091*.0581.89**.287**
12. UST9.486.61.389**.142**–.023.138**.168**.185**–.116**–.105**–.051.042.124**.115**

[i] * Indicates p < .05, and ** Indicates p < .01.

Table 6

Particular skimming behavior as related to median scores on the Unscrambling Sentence Test (UST).

INDEXGROUPNUP (2-TAILED)MEDIANRANGE
Long landscape descriptionsYes, do skim29983886.5.1599.035
Do not skim5309.038
Long dialoguesYes, do skim4213934.0.0867.021
Do not skim7879.038
Long or detailed character descriptionsYes, do skim13343581.0.2848.029
Do not skim6969.038
ViolenceYes, do skim10542073.0.07610.038
Do not skim7249.037
Too many detailsYes, do skim21666729.5.8629.038
Do not skim6139.035
Too complex languageYes, do skim9125337.5.0007.024
Do not skim7389.038
Too obvious informationYes, do skim27284478.5.00710.038
Do not skim5579.037
When the text is too longYes, do skim7731552.5.19310.026
Do not skim7529.038
I never skimNever skim17468013.5.00011.035
Do not skim6558.038
Table 7

Particular skipping behavior as related to median scores on the Unscrambling Sentence Test (UST).

INDEXGROUPNUP (2-TAILED)MEDIANRANGE
Long landscape descriptionsYes, do skip17558227.5.7219.035
Do not skip6549.038
Long dialoguesYes, do skip268190.5.0617.021
Do not skip8039.038
Long or detailed character descriptionsYes, do skip7826989.0.2528.029
Do not skip7519.038
ViolenceYes, do skip8836282.5.08310.538
Do not skip7419.037
Too many detailsYes, do skip13949275.0.6079.038
Do not skip6909.035
Too complex languageYes, do skip5015416.5.0137.024
Do not skip7799.038
Too obvious informationYes, do skip20771611.5.01510.038
Do not skip6229.037
When the text is too longYes, do skip5420851.0.9659.026
Do not skip7759.038
I never skipNever skip32190353.5.00810.035
Do not skip5089.038
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61645/ssol.176 | Journal eISSN: 2210-4380
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 86
Submitted on: Jul 13, 2023
Accepted on: Oct 17, 2023
Published on: Oct 31, 2023
Published by: International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Inge van de Ven, Frank Hakemulder, Anne Mangen, published by International Society for the Empirical Study of Literature
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.