Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Surfing on Three Waves of MOOCs: An Examination and Snapshot of Research in Massive Open Online Courses Cover

Surfing on Three Waves of MOOCs: An Examination and Snapshot of Research in Massive Open Online Courses

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding Learners’ Motivation and Learning Strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996
  2. Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C., & Parada, G. H. A. (2016). Who are the top contributors in a MOOC? Relating participants’ performance and contributions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 232243. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12127
  3. Albelbisi, N., Yusop, F. D., & Salleh, U. K. M. (2018). Mapping the factors influencing success of massive open online courses (MOOC) in Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 29953012. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/91486
  4. Al-Imarah, A. A., & Shields, R. (2019). MOOCs, disruptive innovation and the future of higher education: A conceptual analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 258269. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2018.1443828
  5. Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education, 94, 4960. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010
  6. Beg, A., & Beg, A. (2018). Using open technologies for automatically creating question-and-answer sets for engineering MOOCs. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 617625. DOI: 10.1002/cae.21913
  7. Belleflamme, P., & Jacqmin, J. (2016). An economic appraisal of MOOC platforms: business models and impacts on higher education. CESifo Economic Studies, 62(1), 148169. DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifv016
  8. Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008–2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 118147. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
  9. Bozkurt, A., Koutropoulos, A., Singh, L., & Honeychurch, S. (2020). On Lurking: Multiple perspectives on lurking within an educational community. The Internet and Higher Education, 44(2020), 100709. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100709
  10. Bozkurt, A., Ozdamar Keskin, N., & de Waard, I. (2016). Research trends in massive open online course (MOOC) theses and dissertations: Surfing the tsunami wave. Open Praxis, 8(3), 203221. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.287
  11. Bralić, A., & Divjak, B. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 2. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-017-0085-7
  12. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 1325. https://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SF2.pdf
  13. Bulfin, S., Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2014). Making MOOCs: The construction of a new digital higher education within news media discourse. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 291305. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1856
  14. Bystrova, T., Larionova, V. A., Sinitsyn, E., & Tolmachev, A. (2018). Learning Analytics in Massive Open Online Courses as a Tool for Predicting Learner Performance. Educational Studies Moscow, 4, 139166. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-4-139-166
  15. Calonge, D. S., & Shah, M. A. (2016). MOOCs, Graduate Skills Gaps, and Employability: A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 6790. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2675
  16. Cao, J. (2018). The Future Development Practice and Research on Flipped Classroom Model Based on MOOC in Higher Education. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies, 21(2).
  17. Chen, Y. (2014). Investigating MOOCs through blog mining. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 85106. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1695
  18. Costa, C., Teixeira, L., & Alvelos, H. (2018). Exploring the Usage of MOOCs in Higher Education Institutions: Characterization of the Most Used Platforms. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 14(4), 117. DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.2018100101
  19. Costello, E., Brown, M., Mhichíl, M. N. G., & Zhang, J. (2018). Big course small talk: twitter and MOOCs—a systematic review of research designs 2011–2017. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(44), 116. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-018-0127-9
  20. De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218231. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12130
  21. de Lima, M., & Zorrilla, M. E. (2017). Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 4064. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2630
  22. Deimann, M. (2015). The dark side of the MOOC: A critical inquiry on their claims and realities. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 2(1). https://scholarworks.umb.edu/ciee/vol2/iss1/3/
  23. Ebben, M., & Murphy, J. S. (2014). Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: A review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 328345. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.878352
  24. Egloffstein, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Employee perspectives on MOOCs for workplace learning. TechTrends, 61(1), 6570. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-016-0127-3
  25. Fayyad, U., Grinstein, G. G., & Wierse, A. (Eds.). (2002). Information visualization in data mining and knowledge discovery. Morgan Kaufmann.
  26. Formanek, M., Wenger, M. C., Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., & Sonam, T. (2017). Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC. Computers & Education, 113, 243262. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019
  27. Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2016). Comparing learner community behavior in multiple presentations of a massive open online course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 358369. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-016-9124-y
  28. Gašević, D., Kovanovi, V., Joksimovi, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 134176. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954
  29. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage.
  30. Haddadi, L., Bouarab-Dahmani, F., Guin, N., Berkane, T., & Lazib, S. (2018). Peer assessment and groups formation in massive open online courses. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 18731887. DOI: 10.1002/cae.22005
  31. Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-382229-1.00002-3
  32. Hearst, M. (2003). What is text mining? http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hearst/text-mining.html
  33. Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320341. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12235
  34. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 4558. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
  35. Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157168. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
  36. Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Dowell, N., Mills, C., Gašević, D., … & Brooks, C. (2018). How do we model learning at scale? A systematic review of research on MOOCs. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 4386. DOI: 10.3102/0034654317740335
  37. Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
  38. Kahan, T., Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Types of Participant Behavior in a Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.3087
  39. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441450. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008
  40. Kennedy, J. (2014). Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009–2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13(1), 116. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-26296-9_3
  41. Kim, W., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2016). Perceived learning in three MOOCs targeting attitudinal change. Educational Media International, 53(3), 168183. DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2016.1236890
  42. Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & education, 104, 1833. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
  43. Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(7), 7493. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041
  44. Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Hatala, M. (2015). What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 510527. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12277
  45. Lambert, S. R. (2020). Do MOOCs contribute to student equity and social inclusion? A systematic review 2014–18. Computers & Education, 145, 103693. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103693
  46. Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 2841. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.3749
  47. Lemoine, P. A., & Richardson, M. D. (2015). Micro-Credentials, Nano Degrees, and Digital Badges: New Credentials for Global Higher Education. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing (IJTEM), 5(1), 3649. DOI: 10.4018/ijtem.2015010104
  48. Li, Y., Sun, J., & Sun, M. (2018). Analysis of the development status and impact of MOOCs in American higher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(6), 34423448. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2018.6.251
  49. Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 4048. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003
  50. Liu, L. (2017). The influence and countermeasure of Mooc for Chinese tertiary education based on open and distance education. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 28(3), 785788. DOI: 10.1108/nfs.2008.01738aab.008
  51. Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A., & Williams, S. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202227. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
  52. Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on networked learning 2010 (pp. 266275). United Kingdom: University of Lancaster.
  53. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 7783. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
  54. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Charlottetown, Canada: University of Prince Edward Island. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf
  55. Meek, S. E., Blakemore, L., & Marks, L. (2017). Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 10001013. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052
  56. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
  57. Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 202217. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12131
  58. Raffaghelli, J., Cucchiara, S., & Persico, D. (2015), Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus. British Journal of Educational Technologies, 46(3), 488509. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12279
  59. Rambe, P., & Moeti, M. (2017). Disrupting and democratising higher education provision or entrenching academic elitism: towards a model of MOOCs adoption at African universities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 631651. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9500-3
  60. Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. http://www.eurodl.org/?p=current&article&article=516#MobiMOOC
  61. Rossano, V., Pesare, E., & Roselli, T. (2017). Are computer adaptive tests suitable for assessment in MOOCs. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3). DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829%2F1393
  62. Sa’don, N. F., Alias, R. A., & Ohshima, N. (2014). Nascent research trends in MOOCs in higher educational institutions: A systematic literature review. In Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL), 2014 International Conference (pp. 14). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICWOAL.2014.7009215
  63. Sangrà, A., González-Sanmamed, M., & Anderson, T. (2015). Metaanálisis de la investigación sobre MOOC en el período 2013–2014. Educación XXI: revista de la Facultad de Educación, 18(2), 2149. DOI: 10.5944/educxx1.13463
  64. Santamaría Lancho, M., Hernández, M., Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, Á., Luzón Encabo, J. M., & de Jorge-Botana, G. (2018). Using Semantic Technologies for Formative Assessment and Scoring in Large Courses and MOOCs. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1), 110. DOI: 10.5334/jime.468
  65. Sanz-Martínez, L., Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y. A., Martínez-Monés, A., & Bote-Lorenzo, M. L. (2018). Supporting Teachers in the Design and Implementation of Group Formation Policies in MOOCs: A Case Study. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 24(8), 11101130. http://www.jucs.org/jucs_24_8/supporting_teachers_in_the/jucs_24_08_1110_1130_martinez.pdf
  66. Shen, C. W., & Kuo, C. J. (2015). Learning in massive open online courses: Evidence from social media mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 568577. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.066
  67. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  68. Sinclair, J., & Kalvala, S. (2016). Student engagement in massive open online courses. International Journal of Learning Technology (IJLT), 11(3), 218237. DOI: 10.1504/IJLT.2016.079035
  69. Sunar, A. S., White, S., Abdullah, N. A., & Davis, H. C. (2016). How learners’ interactions sustain engagement: a MOOC case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), 475487. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2016.2633268
  70. Swinnerton, B., Hotchkiss, S., & Morris, N. P. (2017). Comments in MOOCs: who is doing the talking and does it help? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 5164. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12165
  71. Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
  72. Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2015). Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 117. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2202
  73. Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198221. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
  74. Ward, V., West, R., Smith, S., McDermott, S., Keen, J., Pawson, R., & House, A. (2014). The role of informal networks in creating knowledge among health-care managers: a prospective case study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 2(12). http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/92126/1/FullReport-hsdr02120.pdf. DOI: 10.3310/hsdr02120
  75. Watson, S. L., Loizzo, J., Watson, W. R., Mueller, C., Lim, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). Instructional design, facilitation, and perceived learning outcomes: An exploratory case study of a human trafficking MOOC for attitudinal change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 12731300. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9457-2
  76. Wise, A. F., & Cui, Y. (2018). Learning communities in the crowd: Characteristics of content related interactions and social relationships in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 122, 221242. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.021
  77. Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356373. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
  78. Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221232. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
  79. Xing, W., Chen, X., Stein, J., & Marcinkowski, M. (2016). Temporal predication of dropouts in MOOCs: Reaching the low hanging fruit through stacking generalization. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 119129. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.007
  80. Xiong, Y., & Suen, H. K. (2018). Assessment approaches in massive open online courses: Possibilities, challenges and future directions. International Review of Education, 64(2), 241263. DOI: 10.1007/s11159-018-9710-5
  81. Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Bolton, UK: JISC, Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards. http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/2667
  82. Yulianto, B., Prabowo, H., Kosala, R., & Hapsara, M. (2018). Implementation of Learning Analytics in MOOC by Using Artificial Unintelligence. Journal of Computer Science, 14(3), 317323. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-4-139-166
  83. Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs – An explorative content analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 242259. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356
  84. Zhang, J., Skryabin, M., & Song, X. (2016). Understanding the dynamics of MOOC discussion forums with simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA). Distance education, 37(3), 270286. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1226230
  85. Zhang, Q., Peck, K. L., Hristova, A., Jablokow, K. W., Hoffman, V., Park, E., & Bayeck, R. Y. (2016). Exploring the communication preferences of MOOC learners and the value of preference-based groups: Is grouping enough? Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 809837. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-016-9439-4
  86. Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 3139. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.002
  87. Zou, M. (2016). Exploration of Application Mode of MOOC-based Distance Education Mode in Digital Illustration. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 11(09), 6165. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v11i09.6127
Language: English
Page range: 296 - 311
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 17, 2021
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Aras Bozkurt, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.