Say no to Reinventing the Wheel: How other Countries can Build on the Norwegian Model of State-Financed OER to Create More Inclusive Upper Secondary Schools
By: Frank J. Müller
References
- Abbas, N. (2016). From paper to digital, and back. A qualitative study of the publishing of Open Educational Resource based textbooks in a knowledge society. University of Oslo.
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-55488 - Anderson, J., & Christen, K. (2013). “Chuck a Copyright on It”: Dilemmas of Digital Return and the Possibilities for Traditional Knowledge Licenses and Labels. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1–2), 105–126.
https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/mar/article/view/2169/4251 - Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. HarperBusiness.
- Department of Education. (2001). EDUCATION WHITE PAPER 6: Special Needs Education Building an inclusive education and training system.
http://www.info.gov.za/whitepapers/2001/educ6.pdf - EFTA Surveillance Authority. (2011). State Aid: Norwegian support to provider of learning material cleared.
http://www.eftasurv.int/press--publications/press-releases/state-aid/nr/1535 - Hilton, J., Wiley, D., Stein, J., & Johnson, A. (2010). The four R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning, 25(1), 37–44. DOI: 10.1080/02680510903482132
- Hinz, A. (2002). Von der Integration zur Inklusion–terminologisches Spiel oder konzeptionelle Weiterentwicklung. Zeitschrift Für Heilpädagogik, 53(9), 354–361.
- Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., & Hall, C. (2015). 2015 NMC Technology Outlook for Scandinavian Schools.
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182056 - Knox, J. (2013). Teaching in Higher Education Five critiques of the open educational resources movement Five critiques of the open educational resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 821–832. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2013.774354
- Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
- Müller, F. J. (2019). Opportunities and Challenges of State-financed Open Educational Resources: The Norwegian model – a way to more inclusion? Verlag ZLL21 e.V.
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/7325g/ . DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/7325g - NDLA. (2019). Better learning for all through active participation and reflection – The NDLA’s pedagogical platform.
- Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and Diffusion of Open Educational Resources (OER) in Education: A Meta-Analysis of 25 OER-Projects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 122–140. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472
- Pawlowski, J. M., Ossiannilsson, E., Creelman, A., Pirkkalainen, H., Hoel, T., Varis, T., Lounaskorpi, P., Johannessen, Ø., Titlestad, G., Hylen, J., Lund, C. H., & Ellefsen, O. (2013). The Nordic Alliance for Open Education – State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities. The Joy of Learning: Enhancing Learning Experience – Improving Learning Quality. Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network 2013 Annual Conference.
Oslo ,12–15 June, 2013 . 505–514.http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3917567/file/3917577.pdf - Peters, S. J. (2007). “Education for all?” A historical analysis of international inclusive education policy and individuals with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18(2), 98–108. DOI: 10.1177/10442073070180020601
- Pynoo, B., & Van Braak, J. (2014). Predicting teachers’ generative and receptive use of an educational portal by intention, attitude and self-reported use. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 315–322. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.024
- Schuwer, R., Kreijns, K., & Vermeulen, M. (2014). Wikiwijs: An unexpected journey and the lessons learned towards OER. Open Praxis, 6(2), 91–102. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.6.2.116
- Smith, M. L., & Seward, R. (2017). Openness as social praxis. First Monday, 22(4 SE-Articles). DOI: 10.5210/fm.v22i4.7073
- Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). New directions in policy borrowing research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(3), 381–390. DOI: 10.1007/s12564-016-9442-9
- UNESCO. (2019). Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). 33, 59.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373755/PDF/373755eng.pdf.multi.page=3 - United Nations. (2020). The sustainable development goals report 2020. In The sustainable development goals report 2020.
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020.pdf - Wiley, D. (2014). The Access Compromise and the 5th R.
http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221 - Wiley, D., Green, C., & Soares, L. (2012). Dramatically Bringing down the Cost of Education with OER: How Open Education Resources Unlock the Door to Free Learning. Center for American Progress, 1–5.
https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2012/02/pdf/open_education_resources.pdf - Wiley, D., Hilton
III , J. L., Ellington, S., & Hall, T. (2012). A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3 SE-Research Articles), 262–276. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1153 - Wilkie, S., Zakaria, G., McDonald, T., & Borland, R. (2018). Considerations for designing H5P online interactive activities. Open Oceans: Learning without Borders. Proceedings ASCILITE, 543–549.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.13.2.125 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 213 - 227
Submitted on: Sep 11, 2020
Accepted on: May 27, 2021
Published on: Oct 20, 2021
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2021 Frank J. Müller, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.