Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring the Predictive Role of E-Learning Readiness and E-Learning Style on Student Engagement Cover

Exploring the Predictive Role of E-Learning Readiness and E-Learning Style on Student Engagement

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Albayrak, A. S. (2006). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  2. Astin, A., W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297308. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ309521
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Pearson Education.
  4. Beeland, W. (2002). Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards Help? Retrieved from http://www.teachade.com/resources/support/5035b24ec2fbe.pdf
  5. Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010). Indicators of engagement. In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future (pp. 7586). Sydney: Ascilite.
  6. Bryan, T., K., Lutte, R., Lee, J., O’Neil, P., Maher, C.S. & Hoflund, A. B. (2018). When do online education technologies enhance student engagement? A case of distance education at University of Nebraska at Omaha. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(2), 255273. http://doi:10.1080/15236803.2018.1429817
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1360.
  8. Chakraborty, M., & Nafukho, F. M. (2014). Strengthening student engagement: What do students want in online courses? European Journal of Training and Development, 38(9), 782802. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-11-2013-0123
  9. Daniel, B., & Schwier, R. A. (2010). Analysis of Students’ Engagement and Activities in a Virtual Learning Community: A Social Network Methodology. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking (IJVCSN), 2(4), 3150. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvcsn.2010100103
  10. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 113. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890707.pdf
  11. Ergün, E., & Usluel, Y. K. (2015). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenci bağlılık ölçeği’nin türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 1833. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.64661
  12. Eunjoo, O. (2006). Current Practices in Blended Instruction. PhD Thesis. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee.
  13. Finn, J. D. & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221
  14. Floratos, N., Guasch, T. & Espasa, A. (2015). Recommendations on Formative Assessment and Feedback Practices for stronger engagement in MOOCs. Open Praxis, 7(2), 141152. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.2.194
  15. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  16. Gülbahar, Y. & Alper, A. (2014). Development of e-Learning Styles Scale for Electronic Environments. Education & Science, 39(171), 421435. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/download/2078/654
  17. Hampton, D., & Pearce, P. F. (2016). Student engagement in online nursing courses. Nurse Educator. Advance online publication, 41(6), 294298. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000275
  18. Hong, Y. & Gardner, L. (2018). An Exploration of Undergraduates’ Preparedness and Experiences in Blended Courses. Twenty-Second Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Japan.
  19. Hung, M., L., Chou, C., Chen, C., H. & Own, Z., Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 10801090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
  20. Inkelas, K. K., Szele nyi, K., Soldner, M., & Brower, A. M. (2007). National Study of Living- Learning Programs: 2007 Report of findings. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.livelearnstudy.net/additionalresources/reports.html
  21. Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques. Ankara: Asil Publish.
  22. Kaur, K., & Abas, Z., A. (2004). An assessment of e-learning readiness at Open University Malaysia. 10171022. Retrieved from http://library.oum.edu.my/repository/115/1/an_assessment.pdf
  23. Kaymak-Demir, Z. & Horzum, B., M. (2013). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Öğrencilerinin Çevrimiçi Öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk Düzeyleri, Algıladıkları Yapı ve Etkileşim Arasındaki İlişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri- Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 17831797.
  24. Knowles, M., S. (1975). Self-directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York: Association Press.
  25. Levy, Y. (2008). An empirical development of critical value factors (CVF) of online learning activities: An application of activity theory and cognitive value theory. Computers & Education, 51(4), 16641675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.04.003
  26. Motaghian, H., Hassanzadeh, A., & Moghadam, D. K. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors’ adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computers & Education, 61(1), 158167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.016
  27. Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006) The Learning Styles, Expectations, and Needs of Online Students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185189. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.1.185-189
  28. Parkes, M., Stein, S. & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002
  29. Pedone, F. (2014). Learning styles and metacognition. Proceedings of the 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 16781687).
  30. Piskurich, G. M. (Ed.) (2003). Preparing Learners for E-Learning. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  31. Redmond, P., Heffernan, A., Abawi, L., Brown, A., & Henderson, R. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183204. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
  32. Richardson, J., C., & Newby, T. (2006). The Role of Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 2337. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2001_3
  33. Saeed, N., Yang, Y., & Sinnappan, S. (2009). Emerging Web Technologies in Higher Education: A Case of Incorporating Blogs, Podcasts and Social Bookmarks in a Web Programming Course based on Students’ Learning Styles and Technology Preferences. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 98109. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f19/03c07d7960bcadf55e4b77e2cbf0f712120c.pdf
  34. Saeed, S. & Zyngier, D. (2012). How Motivation Influences Student Engagement: A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252267. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
  35. Sakal, M. (2017). Çevrimiçi Öğrenmede Öğrencilerin Hazırbulunuşluk Düzeylerinin Demografik Özelliklerine Göre İncelenmesi. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Researches, 18(39), 81102. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/epod/issue/27273/287125
  36. Schmeck, R., R., Geisler-Brenstein, E., & Cercy, S., P. (1991). Self- concept and Learning: The Revised Inventory of Learning Processes. Educational Psychology11(3/4), 343363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110310
  37. Shukora, N., A, Tasira, Z, Meijdenb, H., V., & Harun, J. (2014). A Predictive Model to Evaluate Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116,48444853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1036
  38. Skilling, K., Bobis, J. & Martin, A. J. (2020). The “ins and outs” of student engagement in mathematics: shift in engagement factors among high and low achievers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00313-2
  39. Song, L., & Hill, J., R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 2742. Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.1.3.pdf
  40. Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  41. Strachan, R. & Liyanage, L. (2015). Active Student Engagement: The Heart of Effective Learning. In P.C. Layne & P. Lake (Eds.), Global Innovation of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (pp. 255274). Springer International Publishing,
  42. Suarez-Orozco C., Pimentel, A. & Martin, M. (2009). The significance of relationships: Academic engagement and achievement among newcomer immigrant youth. Teachers College Record, 111, 712749. Retrieved from https://research.steinhardt.nyu.edu/scmsAdmin/uploads/004/293/TCR%202009.pdf
  43. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
  44. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview_1.pdf
  45. Vermunt, J., D. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education 49(3), 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6664-2
  46. Walker, O., C., Greene, A., B. & Mansell, A., R. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
  47. Yurdugül, H. & Alsancak, Sırakaya, D. (2013). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Hazır Bulunuşluluk Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 391406. Retrieved from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/2420
Language: English
Page range: 175 - 189
Submitted on: Dec 19, 2019
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2020
Published on: Jun 30, 2019
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Esin Ergün, Fatma Betül Kurnaz Adıbatmaz, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.