Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Space as a tool for analysis: Examining digital learning spaces Cover

Space as a tool for analysis: Examining digital learning spaces

Open Access
|Jan 2018

References

  1. Alevizou, P., Galley, R., & Conole, G. (2012). Collectivity, performance andself- representation: Analysing cloudworks as a public space for networked learning and reflection. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.). Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning (pp. 7597). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5
  2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 8097. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
  3. Bayne, S. (2008). Higher education as a visual practice: seeing through the virtual learning environment. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 395410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802169665
  4. Bayne, S. (2010). Academetron, automaton, phantom: uncanny digital pedagogies. London Review of Education, 8(1), 513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460903557589
  5. Bligh, B., & Crook, C. (2017). Learning spaces. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, & R. Sutherland (Eds.). Technology enhanced learning: research themes (pp. 121). Springer.
  6. Bligh, B., & Pearshouse, I. (2011). Doing learning space evaluations. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.). Re-shaping learning: A critical reader: The future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education (pp. 318). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  7. Boys, J. (2011). Where is the theory. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.). Re-shaping learning: A critical reader: The future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education (pp. 4966). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  8. Boys, J., & Smith, H. (2011). What do we know about what is being built? In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.). Re-shaping learning: A critical reader: The future of learning spaces in post-compulsory education (pp. 3347). Sense.
  9. Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014a). Introduction: Networked learning and learning networks. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.). The archiecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.
  10. Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014b). Synthesis: Set design, epistemic design and the functioning of learning networks. In L. Carvalho & P. Goodyear (Eds.). The archiecture of productive learning networks. Routledge.
  11. Conole, G. (2010). Facilitating new forms of discourse for learning and teaching: harnessing the power of Web 2.0 practices. Open Learning, 25(2), 141151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680511003787438
  12. Dodge, M. (2005). The Role of Maps in Virtual Research Methods. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual Methods. Issues in Social research on the Internet (pp. 113128). Berg Publishers, UK.
  13. Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). Agoraphobia and the modern learner. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2014(1), 116. http://doi.org/10.5334/2014-03
  14. Edwards, R. (2015). Knowledge infrastructures and the inscrutability of openness in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 251264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1006131
  15. Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149191. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3056
  16. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. New York, NY: Routledge.
  17. Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649421
  18. Goodfellow, R., & Hewling, A. (2005). Reconceptualising culture in virtual learning environments: From an “essentialist” to a “negotiated” perspective. E-Learning, 2(4), 355. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.355
  19. Guimarães, M. (2005). Doing anthropology in cyberspace: Fieldwork boundaries and social environments. In C. Hine (Ed.). Virtual Methods. Issues in Social research on the Internet (pp. 141156). Berg Publishers, UK.
  20. Jacklin, H. (2004). Discourse, interaction and spatial rhythms: locating pedagogic practice in a material world. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 12(3), 373398. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200208
  21. Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code-space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  22. Knox, J. (2014). The global institution, the homely, and the overwhelming: (per)forming three MOOC spaces. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair (Eds.). Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 533540).
  23. Kuntz, A. M., & Berger, J. B. (2011). Faculty work practices in material environments: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(3), 239264. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0019
  24. Law, J. (2002). Objects and spaces. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(200210), 91105. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899165
  25. Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping New Mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09358129
  26. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Wiley-Blackwell.
  27. Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage Publications.
  28. McRae, L. (2014). Learning or liking: Educational architecture and the efficacy of attention. Digital Culture & Education, 6(April), 3046. Retrieved from http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/uncategorized/a2_mcrae/
  29. Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631279402400402
  30. Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 575595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128
  31. Oliver, M. (2015). From openness to permeability: reframing open education in terms of positive liberty in the enactment of academic practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), 365384. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1029940
  32. Ross, J., Sinclair, C., Knox, J., Bayne, S., & Macleod, H. (2014). Teacher experiences and academic identity: The missing components of MOOC pedagogy. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 5769. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no1/ross_0314.pdf
  33. Ryberg, T. (2008). Privacy, power, place and identity – the construction of mixed spaces in an educational context. In IR 9.0 – Rethinking Communities, Rethinking Place. Association of Internet Researchers.
  34. Ryberg, T., Buus, L., & Georgsen, M. (2012). Differences in understandings of networked learning theory: Connectivity or Collaboration? In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.). Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning (pp. 4352). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5
  35. Saadatmand, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2012). Emerging technologies and new learning ecologies: Learners’ perceptions of learning in open and networked environments. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning 2012 (pp. 266275).
  36. Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.
  37. Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2005). Web sphere analysis: An approach to studying online action. In C. Hine (Ed.). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 157170). Berg Publishers, UK.
  38. Sheehy, M. (2009). Can the literacy practices in an after-school programme be practised in school? A study of literacies from a spatial perspective. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(2), 141160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360902934384
  39. Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
  40. Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Wiley-Blackwell.
  41. Thompson, T. L. (2014). Mobile work-learning: Spatial re-orderings and digital fluencies. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 541546).
  42. Thrift, N. (2003). Space: the fundamental stuff of geography. In S. Holloway, S. Rice, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 95108). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  43. Watters, A. (2015, June 10). Learning networks, not teaching machines. Hack Education. Retrieved from http://hackeducation.com/2015/06/10/eden2015
  44. Williamson, B. (2012). Coded curriculum: The algorithmic architectures of learning. Retrieved from https://dmlcentral.net/coded-curriculum-the-new-architectures-of-learning/
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 28
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2017
Accepted on: Jan 14, 2018
Published on: Jan 1, 2018
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Michelle Harrison, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.