Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical Simulations of Suppression Effect of Water Mist on Hydrogen Deflagration in Confined Spaces Cover

Numerical Simulations of Suppression Effect of Water Mist on Hydrogen Deflagration in Confined Spaces

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Geometrical model of tunnel facility with nine vehicles, including cars, a van, and a bus.

Figure 2

Computational domain views in a vertical cut (a) and in a horizontal cut (b), showing the layout of vehicle models and the positions of pressure gauges modelled in simulations.

Figure 3

Adiabatic H2 blowdown parameters at effective nozzle: mass flow rate (kg/s) and temperature (K), approximately equivalent to H2 release through a TPRD nozzle diameter of 2.24 mm from a storage tank of 0.053 m3 at 118 bar.

Figure 4

Misted region in the tunnel.

Table 1

Simulation cases with variant ventilations and ignition times with or without water mist.

VENTILATION VELOCITY, m/sIGNITION TIME WITHOUT MIST, sIGNITION TIME WITH MIST, s
2.55.19.25.1
0ABCJ
1.25DEFK
2.40GHIL
Figure 5

Hydrogen concentration contours in a longitudinal vertical cut through TPRD nozzle without ventilation at t = (a) 2.5 s; (b) 5 s; (c) 7 s; (d) 9 s.

Figure 6

Hydrogen concentration contours in a horizontal view right below the chassis of the leaking vehicle without ventilation at t = (a) 2.5 s; (b) 5 s; (c) 7 s; (d) 9 s.

Figure 7

Hydrogen concentration contours in a longitudinal vertical cut through TPRD nozzle with 1.25 m/s ventilation at t = (a) 2.5 s; (b) 5 s; (c) 7 s; (d) 9 s.

Figure 8

Hydrogen concentration contours in a horizontal view right below the chassis of the leaking vehicle with 1.25 m/s ventilation at t = (a) 2.5 s; (b) 5 s; (c) 7 s; (d) 9 s.

Figure 9

Hydrogen concentration contours in a longitudinal vertical cut through TPRD nozzle with 2.4 m/s ventilation at t = (a) 2.5 s; (b) 5 s; (c) 7 s; (d) 9 s.

Figure 10

Hydrogen concentration contours in a horizontal view right below the chassis of the leaking vehicle with 2.4 m/s ventilation at t = (a) 2.5 s; (b) 5 s; (c) 7 s; (d) 9 s.

Table 2

Maximum overpressure for various cases.

VENTILATION VELOCITY, m/sMAXIMUM OVERPRESSURE, Pa
IGNITION TIME WITHOUT MIST, sIGNITION TIME WITH MIST, s
2.55.19.25.1
02335207515141413
1.254226530538823058
2.404550490944733294
Figure 11

Overpressures in case of ignition time of 5.1 s without ventilation, without mist.

Figure 12

Overpressures in case of ignition time of 5.1 s with 1.25 m/s ventilation, without mist.

Figure 13

Overpressures in case of ignition time of 5.1 s with 2.4 m/s ventilation, without mist.

Figure 14

Overpressures in case of ignition time of 5.1 s without ventilation, with mist.

Figure 15

Overpressures in case of ignition time of 5.1 s with 1.25 m/s ventilation, with mist.

Figure 16

Overpressures in case of ignition time of 5.1 s with 2.4 m/s ventilation, with mist.

Language: English
Page range: 76 - 87
Submitted on: Jul 4, 2025
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2025
Published on: Nov 17, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Zhanjie Xu, Zhi Zhang, Alexei Kotchourko, Alexander Lelyakin, published by KIT Scientific Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.