Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Verb Aspect and its Role in Reasoning About Guilt Cover
Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Abwender, D. A., & Hough, K. (2001). Interactive effects of characteristics of defendant and mock juror on U.S. participants’ judgment and sentencing recommendations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 603-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600574
  2. Anderson, S. E., Matlock, T., & Spivey, M. (2013). Grammatical aspect and temporal distance in motion descriptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(2013), 337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00337
  3. Becker, R. B., Ferretti, T. R., & Madden-Lombardi, C. J. (2013). Grammatical aspect, lexical aspect and event duration constrain the availability of events in narratives. Cognition, 129(2), 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.014
  4. Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain & Language, 112(3), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002
  5. Bohner, G. (2001). Writing about rape: Use of the passive voice and other distancing text features as an expression of perceived responsibility of the victim. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164957
  6. Budwig, N. (1989). The linguistic marking of agentivity and control in child language. Journal of Child Language, 16(2), 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010412
  7. Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013a). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
  8. Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013b). Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8), 585-586. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475-c4
  9. Calas, F., & Rossi, N. (2001). Eléments de réflexion sur l’aspect grammatical et lexical [Considerations on grammatical and lexical aspect]. Linformation Grammaticale, 89, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.3406/igram.2001.2711
  10. Carreiras, M., Carriedo, N., Alonso, M. A., & Fernández, A. (1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25(4), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201120
  11. Cheung, V., & Lagnado, D. (2023). Defendant character influences mock juror judgments of blame, guilt, and punishment. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes, & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Vol. 45 (pp. 1258-1265). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8v87v6j9
  12. Christley, R. M. (2010). Power and error: increased risk of false positive results in underpowered studies. The Open Epidemiology Journal, 3(1), 16-19. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874297101003010016
  13. Chrystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics, 6th edition. Wiley Blackwell. Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2004). Telling it like it isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violence. Discourse and Society, 15(5), 499-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504045031
  14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  15. Coll-Florit M, & Gennari, S. P. (2011). Time in language: Event duration in language comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 62(1), 41-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.09.002
  16. Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Čordalija, N. (2021). The theory of aspect and its processing correlates in neuro-linguistics and psycholinguistic studies. Journal of the Faculty of Philosophy in Sarajevo, 24, 251-272. https://doi.org/10.46352/23036990.2021.251
  18. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1314-1329. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314
  19. Corrigan, R. (1988). Who dun it? The influence of actor-patient animacy and type of verb in the making of causal attributions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90067-8
  20. De Freitas, J., DeScioli, P., Nemirow, J., Massenkoff, M., & Pinker, S. (2017). Kill or die: Moral judgment alters linguistic coding of causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000369
  21. De Wit, A., & Brisard, F. (2020). Aspect beyond time: Introduction. Journal of Linguistics, 56(3), 459-477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222672000016X
  22. Dumat-Mallet, E., Button, K. S., Boraud, T., Gonon, F., & Munafò, M. R. (2017). Low statistical power in biomedical sciences: A review of three human research domains. Royal Society open science, 4(2), 160254. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160254
  23. Eerland, A., Sherrill, A. M., Magliano, J. P., & Zwaan, R. A. (2017). The blame game: An investigation of grammatical aspect and blame judgments. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), article 29. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.113
  24. Eerland, A., Sherrill, A. M., Magliano, J. P., Zwaan, R. A., Arnal, J. D., Aucoin, P., Berger, S. A., Birt, A. R., Capezza, N., Carlucci, M., Crocker, C., Ferretti, T. R., Kibbe, M. R., Knepp, M. M., Kurby, C. A., Melcher, J. M., Michael, S. W., Poirier, C., & Prenoveau, J. M. (2016). Registered replication report: Hart & Albarracín (2011). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615605826
  25. Eisenberg, T., & Hans, V. P. (2009). Taking a stand on taking the stand: The effect of a prior criminal record on the decision to testify and on trial outcomes. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1354-1388. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/lsrp_papers/90
  26. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). G Power: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
  27. Fauconnier, S. (2011). Involuntary agent constructions are not directly linked to reduced transitivity. Studies in Language, 35(2), 311-336. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.2.03fau
  28. Fausey, C. M., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(5), 644-650. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.5.644
  29. Fausey, C. M., & Matlock, T. (2011). Can grammar win elections? Political Psychology, 32(4), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00802.x
  30. Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33(1), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182
  31. Ferretti, T. R., Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Crutchley, M. (2009). Verb aspect, event structure, and co-referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.001
  32. Ferstl, E. C., Garnham, A., & Manouilidou, C. (2011). Implicit causality bias in English: A corpus of 300 verbs. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0023-2
  33. Flecken, M., & Gerwien, J. (2013). Grammatical aspect influences event duration estimations: Evidence from Dutch. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Cooperative minds: Social interaction and group dynamics: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2309-2314). Austin TX, Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4f50f5h0
  34. Fontaine, R. G. (2007). Disentangling the psychology and law of instrumental and reactive subtypes of agression. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13(2), 143-165. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-8971.13.2.143
  35. Formanowicz, M., Roessel, J., Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2017). Verbs as linguistic markers of agency: The social side of grammar. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(5), 566-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2231
  36. Fountain, A. (2008). It’s all in the words: Determining the relationship between newspaper portrayal of rape victims and readers responses. Undergraduate Review, 4(1), 33-38. https://vc.bridgew.edu/undergrad_rev/vol4/iss1/10
  37. Frith, C. (2013). The psychology of volition. Experimental Brain Research, 229, 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3407-6
  38. Giner-Sorolla, R., Montoya, A. K., Reifman, A., Carpenter, T., Lewis Jr, N. A., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Conrique, B. G., Ng, B. W., Schoemann, A. M., Soderberg, C. (2024). Power to detect what ? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(3), 276-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241228328
  39. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90063-5
  40. Greene, E., & Dodge, M. (1995). The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 19(1), 67-78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01499073
  41. Hall, D. C. (2015). Imagining accomplishments from differing visual and temporal perspectives. Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive). 1753. https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1753
  42. Hans, V. P., & Doob, A. N. (1976). Section 12 of the Canada evidence act and the deliberations of simulated juries. Criminal Law Quarterly, 18, 235-253. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/337
  43. Hart, C. (2018). Event-frames affect blame assignment and perception of aggression in discourse on political protests: An experimental case study in critical discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 400-421. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw017
  44. Hart, W. (2016). A comment on Eerland et al. (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 309-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616637
  45. Hart, W., & Albarracìn, D. (2011). Learning about what others were doing: Verb aspect and attributions of mundane and criminal intent for past actions. Psychological Science, 22(2), 261-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610395393
  46. Hartshorne, J. K., & Snedeker, J. (2013). Verb argument structure predicts implicit causality: The advantages of finer-grained semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(10), 1474-1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.689305
  47. Haynes, E. (2023). The effect of a prior criminal record on juror decision making (Publication No. 5303). [Master’s thesis, University of North Datkota] https://commons.und.edu/theses/5303
  48. Holcombe, A. O. (2016). Introduction to the registered replication report: Hart and Albarracìn (2011). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 156-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615625899
  49. Hong, J. P., Ferretti, T. R., Craven, R., & Hepburn, R. D. (2019). Time, verbs and imagining events. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000163
  50. Hope, L., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2004). Understanding pretrial publicity: Predecisional distorsion of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.111
  51. Hornsby, J. (1998). Volitional theories: Actions, parts and causes. In H. Jennifer (Ed.), Action. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-V001-1
  52. King, K. C., & Strony, R. (2023). Needlestick. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493147/
  53. Kittilä, S. (2005). Remarks on involuntary agent constructions. Word, 56(3), 381-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2005.11432555
  54. Khor, S.Y. (2020). Volition. In J. Stanlaw (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0399
  55. Laudan, L., & Allen R. J. (2011). The devastating impact of prior crimes evidence and other myths of the criminal justice process. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101(2), 493-528. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol101/iss2/4
  56. Leets, L. (2000). Attributional impact of linguistic masking devices. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(3), 342-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X00019003004
  57. Lindschouw, J. J., & Reebirk, C. (2017). L’apprentissage de l’aspect verbal en français [Learning the verbal aspect in French]. Synergies Pays Scandinaves, 11-12, 27-39. http://gerflint.fr/Base/Paysscandinaves11_12/lindschouw_reebirk.pdf
  58. Liu, N., & Bergen, B. (2016). When do language comprehenders mentally simulate locations? Cognitive Linguistics, 27(2), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0123
  59. Madden, C. J., & Ferretti, T. R. (2009). Verb aspect and the mental representation of situations. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp. 217-231). Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199031.217
  60. Madden, C. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 31(5), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196106
  61. Madden-Lombardi, C. J., Dominey, P. F., & Ventre-Dominey, J. (2017) Grammatical verb aspect and event roles in sentence processing. PLoS ONE 12(12), article e0189919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189919
  62. Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 29(2), 83-112. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2902_1
  63. Manzanares, J. V. (2014). Cognitive linguistics and the law. Anuari di Filologia. Estudis di Lingüística, 4, 185-200. https://raco.cat/index.php/AFEL/article/view/288761
  64. Matasović, R. (2016). Volition in grammar and lexical representation of verbs: The case of Karbadian involuntative. In J. Fleischhauer, A. Latrouite & R. Osswald (Eds.), Explorations of the syntax-semantics interface (pp. 247-264). Düsseldorf University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110720297-009
  65. Matlock, T. (2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2(2), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog.2010.010
  66. Matlock, T. (2011). The conceptual motivation of aspect. In K. U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon (pp. 133-148). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.27.09mat
  67. Matlock, T. (2012). Framing political messages with grammar and metaphor. American Scientist, 100(6), 478-483. https://doi.org/10.1511/2012.99.478
  68. Matlock, T., Sparks, D., Matthews, J. L., Hunter, J., & Huette, S. (2012). Smashing new results on aspectual framing. How people talk about car accidents. Studies in Language, 36(3), 700-721. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.3.09mat
  69. Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors : A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315-1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x
  70. Mengistu, D. A., Tolera, S. T., & Demmu, Y. M. (2021). Worldwilde prevalence of occupationnal exposure to needle stick injury among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-anaysis. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 21(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9019534
  71. Michaud, G., & Damay, S. (2024). L’enseignement aspectuel des temps du passé selon une approche basée sur les concepts [The aspectual teaching of past tenses according to a concept-based approach]. Revue de lAssociation Québécoise des Enseignants de Français Langue Seconde, 37(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7202/1111722ar
  72. Minor, S., Mitrofanova, N., & Ramchand, G. (2022). Fine-grained time course of verb aspect processing. PLoS ONE, 17(2), article e0264132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264132
  73. Monroe, A. E., Reeder, G. D., & James, L. (2015). Perceptions of intentionality for goal-related actions: Behavioral description matters. PLoS ONE 10(3), article e0119841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119841
  74. Morrow, D. G. (1985). Prepositions and verb aspect in narrative understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(4), 390-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90036-1
  75. Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(3), 292-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90035-1
  76. Mozuraitis, M., Chambers, C. G., & Daneman, M. (2013). Younger and older adults’ use of verb aspect and world knowledge in the online interpretation of discourse. Discourse Processes, 50(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.726184
  77. Oswald, M. E. (2009). How knowledge about the defendant’s previous convictions influences judgments of guilt. In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), Social Psychology of Punishment of Crime (pp. 357-377). Wiley-Blackwell. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-08430-019
  78. Otto, A. M., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1994). The biasing impact of pre-trial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18(4), 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499050
  79. Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. International Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), article 20. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.181
  80. Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Viking.
  81. Rhein, R. (2019). Pretrial publicity and juror decision making: Effects of inadmissible evidence and coverage of its exclusion from trial (Publication No. 227) [Undergraduate thesis, University of Dayton]. University of Dayton. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/227
  82. Saussure, L. (2003). Temps et pertinence. Eléments de pragmatique cognitive du temps [Time and relevance. Elements of a cognitive pragmatic of time]. De Boeck Supérieur- Duculot. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.sauss.2003.01
  83. Schmittat, S. M. (2023). Prior conviction evidence: Harmful or irrelevant? A literature review. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 38(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09557-z
  84. Sherrill, A. M., Eerland, A., Zwaan, R. A., & Magliano, J. P. (2015). Understanding how grammatical aspect influences legal judgment. PLoS ONE, 10(10), article e0141181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141181
  85. Shibatani, M., & Pardeshi, P. (2008). The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (Ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (pp. 85-126). John Benjamin. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48
  86. Shreves, W. B., Hart, W., Adams, J. M., Guadagno, R. E., & Eno, C. A. (2014). The complex interplay between semantics and grammar in impression formation. Cognition, 132(3), 455-460. doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.007
  87. Spohn, C., & Welch, S. (1987). The effect of prior record in sentencing research: An examination of the assumption that any measure is adequate. Justice Quarterly, 4(2), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828700089331
  88. Strömwall, L. A., Landström, S, & Alfredsson, H. (2014). Perpetrator characteristics and blame attributions in a stranger rape situation. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6(2), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.002
  89. Studebaker, C. A., & Penrod, S. D. (2005). Pretrial publicity and its influence on juror decision making. In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 254-275). Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07316-008
  90. Sue, S., Smith, R. E., & Gilbert, R. (1974). Biasing effects of pretrial publicity on judicial decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(74)90007-5
  91. Tan, D. A. L., (2019). Language and political psychology: Can grammar influence electability? Journal of Language Studies, 19(3), 1-21. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1903-01
  92. Tillman, R., Langston, W., & Louwerse, M. (2013). Attribution of responsibility by Spanish and English speakers: How native language affects our social judgments. Re-vista Signos, 46(83), 408-422. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342013000300006
  93. Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2003). Attribution and person perception. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 176-194). Sage Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608221.n8
  94. Truitt, T. P., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Verb aspect affects the generation of instrument inferences. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psycho-nomic Society, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  95. Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371
  96. Verhoeven, E. (2017). Scales or features in verb meaning? Verb classes as predictors of syntactic behavior. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 164-193. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.00007.ver
  97. Wissler, R. L., & Saks, M. J. (1985). On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law & Human Behavior, 9(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044288
  98. Wistrich, A. J., Guthrie, C., & Rachlinski, J. J. (2005). Can judges ignore inadmissible information? The difficulty of deliberately disregarding. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 153, 1251-1345. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/lsrp_papers/20
  99. Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2013). Mind attribution is for morality. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & M. V. Lombardo (Eds.). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 93-103). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692972.003.0006
  100. Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2004). Updating situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30(1), 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.283
  101. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 56
Published on: Mar 17, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Vincent Coppola, Teenie Matlock, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.