Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Exploring Gender Identity Cues in Email Signature Blocks: An Experimental Study Cover

Exploring Gender Identity Cues in Email Signature Blocks: An Experimental Study

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751 - 763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
  2. Ansara, Y. G., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Methodologies of misgendering: Recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research. Feminism & Psychology, 24(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514526217
  3. Anderson, V. N. (2023). What does transgender mean to you? Transgender definitions and attitudes toward trans people. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 10(4), 600–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000566
  4. Baumler, R., & Piercy, C. W. (2025). Crystallized trans identity: How authenticity and identity communication affect job and life satisfaction. Communication Research, 52(7), 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241234840
  5. Bettcher, T. M. (2014). Transphobia. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1-2), 249-251. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2400181
  6. Bohner, G., Moskowitz, G. B., & Chaiken, S. (1995). The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 33–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000003
  7. Boulton, A. J., & Williford, A. (2018). Analyzing skewed continuous outcomes with many zeros: A tutorial for social work and youth prevention science researchers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 9(4), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1086/701235
  8. Boyd, R. L., Ashokkumar, A., Seraj, S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2022). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app
  9. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University.
  10. Buck, D. M. (2016). Defining transgender: What do lay definitions say about prejudice? Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(4), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000191
  11. Carr, C. T. (2017). A social identification approach to the effects of religious disclosures in business communication. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(5), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1248810
  12. Carr, C. T. & Stefaniak, C. (2012). Sent from my iPhone: The medium and message as cues of sender professionalism in mobile telephony. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(4), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.712707
  13. Ching, B. H.-H., Xu, J. T., Chen, T. T., & Kong, K. H. C. (2020). Gender essentialism, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and filial piety as predictors for transprejudice in Chinese people. Sex Roles, 83(7–8), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01123-3
  14. Clark, K. A. & Hughto, J. M. W. (2020). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Transgender Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (T-KAB) scale. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 17(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00399-9
  15. Collins, K. A., & Clément, R. (2012). Language and prejudice: Direct and moderated effects. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(4), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12446611
  16. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  17. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
  18. Datayze (n.d.). Baby Name Uniqueness Analyzer: Riley. Retrieved from https://datayze.com/name-uniqueness-analyzer?name=riley
  19. Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 21–47). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11863-002
  20. Eames, T. (2024). A field experiment on pronoun disclosure and nonbinary hiring discrimination. Available at SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4694653
  21. Fisher, A. D. Castellini, G., Ristori, J., Casale, H., Giovandardi, G., Carone, N., …Ricca, V. (2016). Who has the worst attitudes toward sexual minorities? Comparison of transphobia and homophobia levels in gender dysphoric individuals, the general population and health care providers. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 40, 263-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0552-3
  22. Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 27(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825
  23. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  24. Friedman, M. & Poole, J. (2023). Sign “In the space provided”: Academic email signatures as sites of narrative, branding, and refusal? In L. Lisa Ortiz-Villarelle (Ed.), Career narratives and academic womanhood 1st ed. (pp. 54-67). Taylor & Francis.
  25. Gallagher, N. M. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2021). Gender essentialism and the mental representation of transgender women and men: A multimethod investigation of stereotype content. Cognition, 217, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104887
  26. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.
  27. Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Higher educational experiences of trans binary and nonbinary graduate students. In G. Beemyn (Ed.), Trans people in higher education (pp. 135-157). State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438472751
  28. Greenberg, D., Najle, M., Jackson, N., Bola, O., & Jones, R. P. (2019, June 11). America’s growing support for transgender rights. PRRI. https://www.prri.org/research/americas-growing-support-for-transgender-rights/
  29. Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  30. Hayes A. F., & Coutts J. J. (2020). Use Omega rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
  31. Howansky, K., Wittlin, N., Bonagura, D., & Cole, S. (2022). Him, her, them, or none: misgendering and degendering of transgender individuals. Psychology and Sexuality, 13(4), 1026–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1978529
  32. Johnson, I. R., Pietri, E. S., Buck, D. M., & Daas, R. (2021). What’s in a pronoun: Exploring gender pronouns as an organizational identity-safety cue among sexual and gender minorities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 97, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104194
  33. Jones, B. A., Cahill, L., & McDermott, D. T. (2023). Gender, traditional gender ideology, gender essentialist beliefs, and masculinity threat as determinants of attitudes toward trans and gender diverse people in a U.K. sample. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000658
  34. Kennedy, N. (2018). Prisoners of lexicon: Cultural cisgenderism and transgender children. In E. Schneider & C. Baltes-Löhr (Eds.) Normed Children: Effects of gender and sex related normativity on childhood and adolescence (pp. 297–312). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839430200-022
  35. Kodipady, A., Kraft-Todd, G., Sparkman, G., Hu, B., & Young, L. (2023). Beyond virtue signaling: Perceived motivations for pronoun sharing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(7), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12937
  36. Lennon, E., & Mistler, B. J. (2014). Cisgenderism. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2399623
  37. Li, J., Longinos, G., Wilson, S. & Magdy, W. (2020). Emoji and self-identity in twitter bios. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science, pp. 199-211. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcss-1.22
  38. Liamputtong, P., Rice, Z.S. (2021). Stigma, discrimination, and social exclusion. In Liamputtong, P. (Ed.) Handbook of Social Inclusion (pp. 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48277-0_6-2
  39. Lonergan, C. A., & Palomares, N. A. (2020). Physically, biologically, and socially constructed notions of sex and gender in communication science. In K. Floyd & R. Weber (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Science and Biology. New York: Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9781351235587-37
  40. Maji, S., & Sarika, K. (2024). LGBTQ microaggression on the campus: A systematic review. Journal of School Violence, 23(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2023.2289107
  41. Matsuno, E., Bricker, N. L., Savarese, E., Mohr, R., & Balsam, K. F. (2022). “The default is just going to be getting misgendered”: Minority stress experiences among nonbinary adults. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000607
  42. McCarty, M. K. (2024). Email responsiveness varies based on the pronouns in the requesters’ email signature: The role of they/them pronouns. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000737
  43. McCarty, M. K., & Burt, A. H. (2024). Understanding perceptions of gender non-binary people: Consensual and unique stereotypes and prejudice. Sex Roles, 90(3), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01449-2
  44. McLemore, K. A. (2015). Experiences with misgendering: Identity misclassification of transgender spectrum individuals. Self and Identity, 14(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.950691
  45. Michelson, M. R., & Harrison, B. F. (2020). Transforming prejudice: Identity, fear, and transgender rights. Oxford University Press.
  46. Miller, L. R., & Grollman, E. A. (2015). The social costs of gender nonconformity for transgender adults: Implications for discrimination and health. Sociological Forum, 30(3), 809–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12193
  47. Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1678–1712. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000022
  48. Nadal, K. L., Skolnik, A., & Wong, Y. (2012). Interpersonal and systemic micro-aggressions toward transgender people: Implications for counseling. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 6(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2012.648583
  49. Neelon, B., & O’Malley, A. J. (2019). Two-part models for zero-modified count and semicontinuous data. In Health Services Evaluation (pp. 695–716). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8715-3_39
  50. Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6
  51. Palomares, N. A. (2009). Women are sort of more tentative than men, aren’t they?: How men and women use tentative language differently, similarly, and counterstereotypically as a function of gender salience. Communication Research, 36(4), 538–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333034
  52. Perez-Arche, H., & Miller, D. J. (2021). What predicts attitudes toward transgender and nonbinary people? An exploration of gender, authoritarianism, social dominance, and gender ideology. Sex Roles, 85(3–4), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01212-3
  53. Reiman, A.-K., Ocasio, T. S., & Mezzapelle, J. L. (2023). How cisgender people define “transgender” is associated with attitudes toward transgender people. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(3), 991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02454-w
  54. Reid, S. A., & Ng, S. H. (1999). Language, power, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00108
  55. Riordan, M. A., & Glikson, E. (2020). On the hazards of the technology age: How using emojis affects perceptions of leaders. International Journal of Business Communication, article 2329488420971690. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420971690
  56. Riva, P., & Eck, J. (2016). The many faces of social exclusion. In P. Riva & J. Eck (Eds.), Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (1st ed.) (pp. ix-xv). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33033-4
  57. Rudert, S. C., Möring, J. N. R., Kenntemich, C., & Büttner, C. M. (2023). When and why we ostracize others: Motivated social exclusion in group contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(4), 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000423
  58. Ruscher, J. (2017). Prejudiced communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.419
  59. Sczesny, S., Nater, C., & Eagly, A. H. (2019). Agency and communion: Their implications for gender stereotypes and gender identities. In B. Wojciszke & A. Abele (Eds.), Agency and communion in social psychology (pp. 103 – 116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703663
  60. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
  61. Stryker, S. (2017). Transgender history: The roots of today’s revolution (2nd ed.). Seal Press.
  62. Sue, D. W., & Spanierman, L. (2020). Microaggressions in everyday life (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  63. Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676
  64. Verbeek, M. J. A., Hommes, M. A., Stutterheim, S. E., van Lankveld, J. J. D. M., & Bos, A. E. R. (2020). Experiences with stigmatization among transgender individuals after transition: A qualitative study in the Netherlands. International Journal of Transgender Health, 21(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2020.1750529
  65. Van Swol, L. M., Ahn, P. H., Prahl, A., & Gong, Z. (2021). Language use in group discourse and its relationship to group processes. SAGE Open, 11(1),1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211001852
  66. von Hippel, W., Sekaquaptewa, D., Vargas, P. T., (2008). Linguistic markers of implicit attitudes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Brinol (Eds), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 429-458). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809884
  67. Wesselmann, E. D., DeSouza, E. R., AuBuchon, S., Bebel, C., & Parris, L. (2022). Investigating microaggressions against transgender individuals as a form of social exclusion. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 9(4), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000513
  68. Wesselman, E D., Grzybowski, M. R., Steakley-Freeman, D. M., DeSouza, E. R., Nezlek, J. B., & Williams, K. D. (2016). Social exclusion in everyday life. In P. Riva & J. Eck (Eds.), Social exclusion: Psychological approaches to understanding and reducing its impact (1st ed.) (pp. 3-23). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33033-4
  69. Wojciszke, B., Abele A. E., & Baryla W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973–990. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.595
  70. Wood, W. & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109-125). Guildford Press.
  71. Worthen, M. G. F. (2021). Why can’t you just pick one? The stigmatization of non-binary/genderqueer people by cis and trans men and women: An empirical test of norm-centered stigma theory. Sex Roles, 85(5–6), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01216-z
  72. Young, A. M. & Rains, S.A. (2006). A sign of the times: An analysis of organizational members’ email signatures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1046-1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00307.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2025-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 391 - 420
Published on: Dec 8, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 R. Baumler, Nicholas A. Palomares, Cameron W. Piercy, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.