References
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- Filik, R., Ingram, J., Moxey, L., & Leuthold, H. (2021). Irony as a test of the Presupposition-Denial Account: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(6), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09795-y
- Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (2011). Anaphoric reference to quantified antecedents: An event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3786–3794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.043
- Ingram, J., & Moxey, L. M. (2011). Complement set focus without explicit quantity. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.524202
- Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
- Levine, W. H., Guzmán, A. E., & Klin, C. M. (2000). When anaphor resolution fails. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 594–617. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2719
- Moxey, L. M. (2006). Effects of what is expected on the focussing properties of quantifiers: A test of the presupposition-denial account. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.006
- Moxey, L. M., & Filik, R. (2010). The effects of character desire on focus patterns and pronominal reference following quantified statements. Discourse Processes, 47, 588–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530903572976
- Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (1987). Quantifiers and focus. Journal of Semantics, 5, 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/5.3.189
- Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (1993a). Prior expectation and the interpretation of natural language quantifiers. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449308406515
- Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (1993b). Communication quantities: A psychological perspective. Erlbaum.
- Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (2000). Communicating quantities: A review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)-1099-0720(200005/06)14:3<237::AID-ACP641>3.0.CO;2-R
- Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., & Dawydiak, E. J. (2001). Denials as controllers of negative quantifier focus. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 427–442. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2736
- O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2010). Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 979–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019763
- Paterson, K. B., Sanford, A. J., Moxey, L. M., & Dawydiak, E. (1998). Quantifier polarity and referenceial focus during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2561
- Sanford, A. J., Dawydiak E. J., & Moxey, L. M. (2007). A unified account of quantifier perspective effects in discourse. Discourse Processes, 44, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853070128555
- Sanford, A. J., Fay, N., Stewart, A. J., & Moxey, L. M. (2002). Perspective in statements of quantity, with implications for consumer psychology. Psychological Science, 13, 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00424
- Sanford, A. and Moxey, L. (2003) New perspectives on the expression of quantity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 240–243. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01270.x
- Sanford, A. J., Moxey, L. M., & Paterson, K. B. (1996). Attentional focusing with quantifiers in production and comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 24, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200877
- Upadhyay, S. S. N., Houghton, K. J., & Klin, C. M. (2019). Is “few” always less than expected?: The influence of context on readers’ interpretation of natural language quantifiers. Discourse Processes, 56, 708–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1557006