References
- Adler, A. (1912). Über den nervösen Charakter. Grundzuge einer vergleichenden individual-Psychologie und Psychotherapie. Verlag von J.F. Bergmann.
- Adler, A. (1920). Praxis und Theorie der Individualpsychologie. Verlag von J.F. Bergmann.
- Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper.
- Altemeyer, B. (2006). The authoritarians. University of Manitoba Press.
- Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.
- Baker, P., & Vessey, R. (2018). A corpus-driven comparison of English and French Islamist extremist texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 255–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.4.5674.51-a
- Barry, B. (2003). Wywieranie wpływu w organizacjach z perspektywy oczekiwań społecznych [Influence in organizations from a social expectancy perspective]. In: A. Lee-Chai. J. Bargh (Eds.). Władza. Pokusy i zagrożenia [The use and abuse of power] (pp. 34–58). GWP.
- Barrufol, E., & Guntern, A. (1980). Zur Validität des Dogmatismus - Textauswertungsverfahrens von Ertel. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 11, 225–232.
- Biber, D. (2012). Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In: B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. (pp. 193–224). Oxford University Press.
- Bobryk, J. (2014). The relevance of concepts in traditional Polish psychology. Z Historie Psychologie. LVIII(3), 302–310.
- Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Harvard University Press.
- Bougher, L. (2012). The case of metaphor in political reasoning and cognition. Political Psychology, 33(1), 145–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00865.x
- Bralczyk, J. (2003). O języku polskiej polityki lat osiemdziesiątych i dziewięćdziesiątych [On the Language of Polish Politics in the 1980s-1990s]. Trio.
- Bręński, Sz., & Obrębska, M. (2017). Język, płeć i władza. Analiza leksykalna przemówień programowych polskich premierów [Language, sex and power. Lexical analysis of Polish prime ministers’ keynote speeches]. Socjolingwistyka, 31, 117–132. http://dx.doi.org./10.17651/SOCJOLING.31.7
- Brożek, A., Stadler, F., & Woleński, J. (Eds.) (2017). The significance of the Lvov-Warsaw school in the European culture. Springer.
- Budge, I., & Pennings, P. (2006). Do they work? Validating computerised word frequency estimates against policy series. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 121–129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.002
- Carver, T., & Pikalo, J. (2008). Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. Routledge.
- Choi, S., Liu, J., Csertő, I., Vincze, O., Fülöp, E., & Pólya, T. (2019). Automated analysis of narrative: Narrcat and the identification of infrahumanization bias within text. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 39/2. 237–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927x19893833
- Cho, M., & Keltner, D. (2020). Power, approach, and inhibition: Empirical advances of a theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.013
- Cichocka, A., Bilewicz, M., Jost, J., Marrouch, N., & Witkowska, M. (2016). On the grammar of politics – or why conservatives prefer nouns. Political Psychology. 37(6), 799–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12327
- Citlak, A. (2016a). The Lvov-Warsaw school – the forgotten tradition of historical psychology. History of Psychology, 19(2), 105–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hop0000029
- Citlak, A. (2019). The problem of mind and mental acts in the perspective of psychology in the Lvov-Warsaw school. Philosophical Psychology, 32(7), 1049–1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1647410
- Citlak, A. (2020). Group conflicts in light of the cratism theory (psycholinguistic analysis). Annals of Psychology, 23(2), 107–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rpsych20232-1
- Citlak, A. (2021). The psychology of the pursuit for a sense of power and structural patterns of biblical social relations. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(6). 3993–4013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01241-6
- Citlak, A. (2023). Brentano’s psychology and Kazimierz Twardowski School: implications for the empirical study of psychological phenomena today. Psychological Research, 87, 1665–1681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01744-1
- Citlak, A. (2024 in press). The first European strength-power motivation theory (Władysław Witwicki’s theory and the Lvov-Warsaw School). History of Psychology.
- DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026811
- Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S., Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarian-conservatism-traditionalism model. Journal of Political Psychology, 35, 685–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x
- Duszak, A. (Ed.) (2002). Us and others: Social identities across language. Discourse and cultures. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Ertel, S. (1972). Erkenntnis und Dogmatismus. Psychologische Rundschau. 13. 241–269.
- Ertel, S. (1985). Content analysis: An alternative approach to open and closed mind. The High School Journal, 68(4), 229–240.
- Ertel, S. (1986). Language. Thought and culture: Toward a mergence of diverging problem fields. In: I. Kurcz, G.W. Shuga,. J.H. Danks (Eds.). Knowledge and language (pp. 139–163). North Holland
- Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.48.6.621
- Frieze, I., & Bonev,a B. (2003). Motywacja do sprawowania władzy a motywacja do pomagania innym [Power motivation and motivation to help others]. In: A. Lee-Chai, & J. Bargh (Eds.). Władza. Pokusy i zagrożenia [The use and abuse of power]. (pp. 97–114). GWP.
- Fromm. E. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. Holt. Rineheart and Winston.
- Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 227–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003003001
- Góralewska-Słońska, A. (2012). Istota pojęcia władza – kontekst źródeł. wymiarów. skuteczności i patologii – ujęcie teoretyczne [the concept of power -context of sources, dimensions; Efficacy and pathology of power and the theoretical approach]. Problemy Profesjologii, 1, 91–105.
- Graf, S., Bilewicz, M., Finell, E., & Geschke, D. (2013). Nouns cut slices: Effects of linguistic forms on intergroup bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12463209
- Greenaway, K. H., & Cruwys, T. (2019). The source model of group threat: Responding to internal and external threats. American Psychologist, 74(2), 218–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000321
- Greenberg, J., Pyszczyński, T., Solomon, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reaction to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
- Gustafsson, S., Lindholm, T., & Sikström, S. (2014). Selection bias in choice of words: Evaluations of “I” and “we” differ between contexts. But “they” are always worse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X13495856
- Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D., & Platow, M.J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Psychology Press.
- Hube N., & Rambou,r M. (2010). French political parties in campaign (1989–2004): A configurational analysis of political discourses on Europe. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 11(2), 146–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15705851003760909
- Jakubowska, U. (2018). O naturze preferencji politycznych [On the nature of political preferences]. PWN, IP PAN.
- Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13502654
- Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
- Kemper, Th. (1978). A social interactional theory of emotions. Willey.
- Kemper, T. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786845
- Kilkgariff, D. (2001). Comparing corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 6(1), 97–133. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.6.1.05kil
- Kipnis, D. (1990). Technology and power. Springer.
- Kozielecki, J. (1996). The polish economic reform: Transgressive decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(94)00033-7
- Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 826. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826
- Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Journal of Urban and Cultural Studies, 2(1), 59–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2012.4.2.5
- Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003055403000698
- Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. Ronald.
- Lieberman, E., Jean-Baptiste, M., Jackson, J., Tang, T., & Nowak, M. (2007). Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature, 449(7), 13–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06137
- Lin, E., & Schmid, P. C. (2022). Does power increase attention to rewards? Examining the brain and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 101, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104332
- Lynch, R. A. (2011) Foucault’s theory of power. In: D. Taylor (Ed.) Michel Foucault: Key concepts (pp. 13–26). Acumen Publishing.
- Markinówna, E. (1935). Psychologia dążenia do mocy. Zestawienie poglądów Witwickiego i Adlera [the psychology of the pursuit for power. The summary of Witwicki’s and Adler’s theories]. Kwartalnik Psychologiczny, 7, 329–340.
- Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Siemiatkowski, P. (2020). Expose Prezesów Rady Mini-strów 1989-2019 [Addresses of prime ministers in 1989-2019]. Adam Marszałek.
- McClelland, D. (1973). The two faces of power. In: D. McClelland, R. Steele (Eds.). Human motivation (pp. 300–316). General Learning Press.
- McNamara, D.S. (2011). Computational methods to extract meaning from text and advance theories of human cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 3–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01117.x
- Mooijman, M., Kouchaki, M., Beall, E., & Graham, J. (2020). Power decreases the moral condemnation of disgust-inducing transgressions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.04.005
- Moscovitz, D. (2004). Does elevated power lead to approach and reduced power to inhibition? Comment on Keltner, Gruenfeld, and Anderson (2003). Psychological Review, 111(3), 808–811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.3.808
- Pilecki, A., & Hammack, P. (2014). “Victims” versus “righteous victims”: The rhetorical construction of social categories in historical dialogue among Israeli and Palestinian youth. Political Psychology, 35(6), 813–830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12063
- Płaneta, P. (2009). Słowa sztandarowe w exposé polskich premierów w latach 1989-2007 [key words in addresses of Polish prime ministers in 1989-2007]. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze, 7(1–2), 7–34.
- Płotka, W. (2019). From psychology to phenomenology (and back again): A controversy over the method in the school of Twardowski. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19, 141–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09620-x
- Płotka, W. (2023). The origins and development of Leopold Blaustein’s descriptive psychology: An essay in the heritage of the Lvov-Warsaw School. History of Psychology, 26, 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000241
- Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Thirty years of terror management theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 1–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.03.001
- Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Cowley, S. J. (2012), the evolution of language as controlled collectivity. Interaction Studies, 13(1), 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/is.13.1.01rac
- Raven, B. H. (1990). Political application of the psychology of interpersonal influence and social power. Political Psychology, 11, 493-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791662
- Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirsty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217–244.
- Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 277–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01191.x
- Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Kozlowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01708.x
- Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak,& M. Meyer (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 87–121). Sage.
- Rind, B., & Kipnis, D. (1999). Changes in self-perceptions as a result of successfully persuading others. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00109
- Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2012). Power: Its social psychology. International Journal of Social Psychology, 27(3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347412802845595
- Rzepa, T. (1991). Psychologia Władysława Witwickiego [Psychology of Władysław Witwicki]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
- Rzepa, T., & Stachowski, R. (1993). Roots of the methodology of Polish psychology. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 28, 233–250.
- Semenova, E., & Winter, D.G. (2020). A motivational analysis of russian presidents. 1994–2018. Political Psychology, 41(4), 813–834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12652
- Semin, G. R. (2008). Language puzzles: A prospective retrospective on the linguistic category model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07313664
- Sidanius, J., & Prato, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
- Siewierska-Chmaj, A. (2005). Język polskiej polityki. Politologiczno-semantyczna analiza expose premierów Polski w latach 1919-2004 [Language of Polish Politics. Political and semantic analysis of the expose of Polish Prime Ministers in 1919-2004]. WSIiZ.
- Smet, I., & Velde, F. (2020). A corpus-based quantitative analysis of twelve centuries of preterite and past participle morphology in Dutch. Language Variation and Change, 32, 241–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954394520000101
- Smith, Ch. (1996). Content analysis. In: A. Manstead. & A. Hewstone (Eds.) The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
- Smith, A. (2008). The implicit motives of terrorist groups: how the needs for affiliation and power translate into death and destruction. Political Psychology, 29(1), 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00612.x
- Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H.-D., Langens, T. A., & Puca, R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once: the Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa740109
- Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 93–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60328-7
- Steffens, N., & Haslam, S. (2013). Power through ‘Us’: /leaders’ use of we-referencing language predicts election victory. PLoS One, 8(10). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077952
- Stollberg, J., Fritsche, I., & Jonas, E. (2017). The groupy shift: Conformity to liberal in-group norms as a group-based response to threatened personal control. Social Cognition, 35(4), 374–394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.374
- Suedfeld, P. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1669–1702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00666.x
- Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2008). Celebrating two decades of linguistic bias research: An introduction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07313642
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Austin. S. Worchel (Eds.) Psychology of intergroup relation (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
- Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927x09351676
- Turner, J.C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244
- Twardowski, K. (1912/1979). Actions and products. In: J. Pelc (Ed.). Semiotics in Poland 1984-1969. Open WorldCat.
- Vorderer, P., & Groeben, N. (Hrsg.). (1987). Textanalyse als Kognitionskritik? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen ideologiekritischer Inhaltsanalyse (Empirische Literaturwissenschaft. 10). Narr.
- Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking. Basil Blackwell.
- Winter, D. G. (1992). Content analysis of archival data. personal documents. and everyday verbal productions. In C. P. Smith (Ed.). Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 110–125). Cambridge University Press.
- Winter, D. (2005). Things I’ve learned about personality from studying political leaders at a distance. Journal of Personality, 73(3), 557–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00321.x
- Winter, D. G. (2018). What does Trump really want? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 18(1), 155–171 https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12154
- Witwicki, W. (1900). Psychologiczna analiza ambicji [Psychological analysis of ambition] Przegląd Filozoficzny, 3, 26–49.
- Witwicki, W. (1907). Z psychologii stosunków osobistych [From the psychology of personal relationships]. Przegląd Filozoficzny, 10(4), 531–537.
- Witwicki, W. (1926/1962, 1927/1963). Psychologia [Psychology]. PWN.
- Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.) (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
- Woleński, J. (2019). Lvov-Warsaw school. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lvov-warsaw/#SignLvovWarsSchol
- Wulff, D. (2001). Psychology of religion. Classic and contemporary. John Willey & Sons.
- Yin, Y., & Smith, P. K. (2020). Power and cognitive functioning. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.020