Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Highly sensitive persons (HSPs) and the situation of foreign language testing Cover

Highly sensitive persons (HSPs) and the situation of foreign language testing

Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. Acevedo, B. P., Aron, E. N., Aron, A., Sangster, M., Collins, N., & Brown, L. L. (2014). The highly sensitive brain: An fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others’ emotions. Brain and Behavior, 4(4), 580–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.242
  2. Acevedo, B. P. (2020). The basics of sensory processing sensitivity. In B. P. Acevedo (Ed.), The highly sensitive brain: Research, assessment, and treatment of sensory processing sensitivity (pp. 1–15). Elsevier/Academic Press.
  3. Angelovska, T., Mercer, S., & Talbot, K. (2021). Personality traits as predictors of language learner engagement. Language Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2021-2026.
  4. Aron, E. N. (1996). Highly sensitive person: How to thrive when the world overwhelms you. Birch Lane Press.
  5. Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997a). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
  6. Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1997b). Highly Sensitive Person Scale (HSPS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.
  7. Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213
  8. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press eBooks.
  9. Baryła-Matejczuk, M., Porzak, R., & Poleszak, W. (2022). HSPS-10—short version of the highly sensitive person scale for students aged 12–25 years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315775
  10. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033
  11. Benham, G. (2006). The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1433–1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.021
  12. Birgili, B. (2014). Open ended questions as an alternative to multiple choice: Dilemma in Turkish examination system [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University].
  13. Blasiman, R. N., Larabee, D., & Fabry, D. (2018). Distracted students: A comparison of multiple types of distractions on learning in online lectures. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000122
  14. Boterberg, S., & Warreyn, P. (2016). Making sense of it all: The impact of sensory processing sensitivity on daily functioning of children. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.022
  15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  16. Bueno, D. (2021). Exams as a source of stress: How assessment may affect learning, through stress. IBE. Science of Learning Portal.
  17. Cater, K. (2016). Small shifts, big changes: Changing the story for students with Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS). International Journal for Transformative Research, 3(2), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijtr-2016-0010
  18. Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna [Central Examination Commission]. (2023). Komunikat dyrektora Centralnej Komisji Egzaminacyjnej z 17 sierpnia 2023 r. w sprawie szczegółowych sposobów dostosowania warunków i form przeprowadzania egzaminu ósmoklasisty w roku szkolnym 2023/2024 [Message from the Director of the Central Examination Commission dated August 17, 2023, regarding detailed ways of adapting the conditions and forms of conducting the eighth-grade exam in the academic year 2023/2024]. https://www.oke.gda.pl/plikiOKE/Dostosowania/2024/2023_08_17_E8_Komunikat_o_dostosowaniach.pdf.
  19. Chambers, L., Galaczi, E. D. & Gilbert, S. (2012). Test-taker familiarity and speaking test performance: Does it make a difference? In A. N. Archibald (Ed.), Multilingual Theory and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics (pp. 39-43). Scitsiungil Press.
  20. Chamot, A. U. (2018). 3. Developing self-regulated learning in the language classroom. In I. Walker, D. Kwang Guan Chan, M. Nagami, & C. Bourguignon (Eds.), New perspectives on the development of communicative and related competence in foreign language education (pp. 41–52). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501505034-003
  21. Costa-López, B., Ruiz-Robledillo, N., Ferrer-Cascales, R., Albaladejo-Blázquez, N., & Sánchez-SanSegundo, M. (2021). Relationship between sensory processing sensitivity and mental health. Medical Sciences Forum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ecerph-3-09064
  22. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge
  23. Fernaìndez, P. R. (2018). Personas Altamente Sensibles: Claves Psicológicas y espirituales. Descleìe De Brouwer.
  24. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 13(4), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787
  25. Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E. N., Fox, E., Schendan, H. E., … Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
  26. Harms, R., Hatak, I., & Chang, M. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and entrepreneurial intention: The strength of a weak trait. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.00910.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00132
  27. Hartley, L. (1998). A sociolinguistic analysis of face-threat and face-management in potential complaint situations [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University].
  28. Heissel, J. A., Adam, E. K., Doleac, J. L., Figlio, D. N., & Meer, J. (2021). Testing, stress, and performance: how students respond physiologically to high- stakes testing. Education Finance and Policy, 16(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00306
  29. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001047
  30. Hofmann, S., & Bitran, S. (2007). Sensory-processing sensitivity in social anxiety disorder: Relationship to harm avoidance and diagnostic subtypes. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21(7), 944–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.003
  31. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
  32. Huxham, M., Campbell, F., & Westwood, J. (2012). Oral versus written assessments: a test of student performance and attitudes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.515012
  33. Kibe, C., Suzuki, M., Hirano, M., & Boniwell, I. (2020). Sensory processing sensitivity and culturally modified resilience education: Differential Susceptibility in Japanese adolescents. PLOS One, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239002
  34. Kostaki, D., & Karayianni, I. (2022). Houston, we have a pandemic: Technical difficulties, distractions and online student engagement. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6mrhc
  35. Li, H., Pan, H., Yang, R., Wang, X., Rao, J., Zhang, X., & Pan, C. (2021). The relationship between test anxiety and emotion regulation: The mediating effect of psychological resilience. Annals of General Psychiatry, 20, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-021-00360-4
  36. Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (2022). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546
  37. Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., & Pluess, M. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8, 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6
  38. Lionetti, F., Pastore, M., Moscardino, U., Nocentini, A., Pluess, K., & Pluess, M. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.013
  39. May, A. K., Norris, S. A., Richter, L. M., & Pitman, M. M. (2020). A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale in ethnically and culturally heterogeneous South African samples. Current Psychology, 41(7), 4760–4774. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-610.1007/s12144-020-00988-7
  40. Uniwersytet Warszawski, Biuro ds. osób z niepełnosprawnościami [University of Warsaw. Office for persons with disabilities]. (2024). Dostosowanie egzaminów i zaliczeń [Adaptations of exams and credits]. https://bon.uw.edu.pl/dla-studentow/dostosowanie-egzaminow/
  41. Parsons, D. (2008). Is there an alternative to exams? Examination stress in engineering courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(6), 1111–1118.
  42. Pourfeız, J. (2015). Exploring the relationship between global personality traits and attitudes toward foreign language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.119
  43. Pluess, M., & Boniwell, I. (2015). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts treatment response to a school-based depression prevention program: Evidence of vantage sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.011
  44. Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (2018). Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 54(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000406
  45. Roberts, B. W., & Yoon, H. J. (2022). Personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114927
  46. Robinson, D. L., Gabriel, N., & Katchan, O. (1994). Personality and second language learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90118-x
  47. Ronsse, L. M., & Wang, L. M. (2013). Relationships between unoccupied classroom acoustical conditions and elementary student achievement measured in eastern Nebraska. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), 1480–1495. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4789356
  48. Schaefer, M., Kühnel, A., & Gärtner, M. (2022). Sensory processing sensitivity and somatosensory brain activation when feeling touch. Scientific Reports, 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15497-9
  49. Sih, A., & Bell, A. M. (2008). Insights for behavioral ecology from behavio ral syndromes. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 38, 227–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-3454(08)00005-3
  50. Smolewska, K., McCabe, S., & Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five.” Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022
  51. Sparfeldt, J. R., Rost, D. H., Baumeister, U. M., & Christ, O. (2013). Test anxiety in written and oral examinations. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.010
  52. Turjeman-Levi, Y., & Kluger, A. N. (2022). Sensory-processing sensitivity versus the sensory-processing theory: Convergence and divergence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010836
  53. van de Watering, G., Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., & van der Rijt, J. (2008). Students’ assessment preferences, perceptions of assessment and their relationships to study results. Higher Education, 56(6), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9116-6
  54. Wang, M., Zhang, L. J., & Hamilton, R. (2023). Developing the metacognitive awareness of grit scale for a better understanding of learners of English as a foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1141214
  55. Weir, W., & May, R. B. (1988). Environmental context and student performance. Canadian Journal of Education, 13(4), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495290
  56. Zeff, T. (2004). The highly sensitive persons survival guide. New Harbinger Publications.
  57. Zeng, S. (2018). English learning in the digital age. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2499-4
  58. Zivin, J. G., Song, Y., Tang, Q., & Zhang, P. (2020). Temperature and high-stakes cognitive performance: Evidence from the national college entrance examination in China. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 104, 102365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102365
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2024-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 470 - 494
Published on: Sep 30, 2024
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Katarzyna Nosidlak, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.