Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Do gender stereotypes bias the processing of morphological innovations? The case of gender-inclusive language in Spanish Cover

Do gender stereotypes bias the processing of morphological innovations? The case of gender-inclusive language in Spanish

Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. Alpheratz, M. (2019). Français inclusif: du discours à la langue? [Inclusive French: From discourse to language?] Le Discours et la Langue, 111, 53–74.
  2. Ambadiang, T. (1999). La flexión nominal: género y número [Nominal inflection: Gender and number]. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española [Descriptive grammar of the Spanish language] (pp. 4843–4914). Espasa Calpe.
  3. Barrera Linares, L. (2019). Relación género/sexo y masculino inclusivo plural en Español [Gender/sex relationship and inclusive plural masculine in Spanish]. Literatura y Lingüística, 40, 327–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.29344/0717621x.40.2070
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000105397
  5. Bonnin, J. E., & Coronel, A. A. (2021). Attitudes toward gender-neutral Spanish: Acceptability and adoptability. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 629616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.629616
  6. Bonnin, J. E., & Zunino, G.M. (2024). Using inclusive language at school: Reported and perceived use among teachers in Buenos Aires. In C. Soares & G. Silva (Eds.), Inclusiveness beyond the (non)binary in Romance languages: From research to classroom implementation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003432906-3
  7. Bradley, E. D., Salkind, J., Moore, A., & Teitsort, S. (2019). Singular ‘they’ and novel pronouns: Gender-neutral, nonbinary, or both? Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 4(1), 36:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4542
  8. Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1): 16, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.5334%2Fjoc.72
  9. Cabello Pino, M. (2020). Esbozo de una bibliografía crítica sobre -x- y -e- como alternativas al masculino genérico en español (2014-2019) [Outline of a critical bibliography on -x- and -e- as alternatives to the generic masculine in Spanish (2014-2019)]. Tonos Digital. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Filológicos 39(2). 1–25.
  10. Cabeza Pereiro, M. C., & Rodríguez Barcia, S. (2013). Aspectos ideológicos, gramaticales y léxicos del sexismo lingüístico [Ideological, grammatical, and lexical aspects of linguistic sexism]. Estudios Filológicos, 52, 7–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0071-17132013000200001
  11. Cameron, D. (1998). Gender, language and discourse: A review essay. Signs, 23(4), 945–973.
  12. Camilliere, S., Izes, A., Leventhal, O., & Grodner, D. (2021). They is changing: Pragmatic and grammatical factors that license singular they. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43.
  13. Canal, P., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. (2015). Beyond gender stereotypes in language comprehension: Self sex-role descriptions affect the brain’s potentials associated with agreement processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01953
  14. Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49(3), 639–663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755647
  15. Dixon, J. (1987). The question of genres. In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 9–21). Typereader Publications.
  16. Drummond, A. (2013). Ibex farm. http://spellout.net/ibexfarm
  17. Duffy, S. A., & Keir, J. A. (2004). Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 32(4), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195846
  18. Fábregas, A. (2022). El género inclusivo: una mirada gramatical [Inclusive gender: a grammatical view]. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica, 51, 25–46. https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.5292
  19. Friedrich, M. C. G., Drößler, V., Oberlehberg, N., & Heise, E. (2021). The influence of the gender asterisk (“gendersternchen”) on comprehensibility and interest. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 760062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760062
  20. Giammatteo, M. (2020). El género gramatical en español y la disputa por el gé-nero [Grammatical gender in Spanish and the gender dispute]. Cuarenta Naipes. Revista de Cultura y Literatura, 3, 177–198.
  21. Gil, A. S., & Morales, P. (2020). Tensiones y posiciones respecto de los usos del lenguaje: una batalla no solo cultural [Tensions and positions regarding language use: not just a cultural battle]. Estudios de Filosofía Práctica e Historia de la Ideas, 22, 1–15.
  22. Gygax, P., Elminger, D., Zufferey, S., Garnhan, A., Sczesny, S., von Stockhausen, L., Braun, F., & Oakhill, J. (2019). A language index of grammatical gender dimensions to study the impact of grammatical gender on the way we perceive women and men. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01604
  23. Hartley, J. T., Stojack, C. C., Mushaney, T. J., Annon, T. A., & Lee, D. W. (1994). Reading speed and prose memory in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 9(2), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.216
  24. Hellinger, M., & Bußmann, H. (2001). Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men Vol. 1. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  25. Horvath, L. K., Merkel, E. F., Maass, A., & Sczesny, S. (2016). Does gender-fair language pay off? The social perception of professions from a cross-linguistic perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02018
  26. Jäger, L. A., Mertzen, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Vasishth, S. (2020). Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study. Journal of Memory and Language, 111, 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104063
  27. Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev--psych-122414-033702
  28. Kalinowski, S. (2020). Lenguaje inclusivo en usuarios de Twitter en Argentina: un estudio de corpus [Inclusive language among Twitter users in Argentina: A corpus study]. Cuarenta Naipes. Revista de Cultura y Literatura, 3, 233–259.
  29. Koeser, S., & Sczesny, S. (2014). Promoting gender-fair language: The impact of arguments on language use, attitudes, and cognitions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(5), 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14541280
  30. Körner, A., Abraham, B., Rummer, R., & Strack, F. (2022). Gender representations elicited by the gender star form. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221080181
  31. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  32. Leaper, C. (2014). Gender similarities and differences in language. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 62–81). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838639.013.002
  33. Lewis, M., & Lupyan, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(10), 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0918-6
  34. Lindqvist, A., Renström, E. A., & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2019). Reducing a male bias in language? Establishing the efficiency of three different gender-fair language strategies. Sex Roles, 81, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9
  35. López, Á. (2020). Cuando el lenguaje excluye: consideraciones sobre el lenguaje no binario indirecto [When language excludes: considerations on indirect nonbinary language]. Cuarenta Naipes. Revista de Cultura y Literatura, 3, 295–312.
  36. Márquez, M. (2013). Género gramatical y discurso sexista [Grammatical gender and sexist discourse]. Síntesis.
  37. Mendívil Giró, J. L. (2020). El masculino inclusivo en español [The inclusive masculine in Spanish]. Revista Española de Lingüística, 50/1, 35–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.31810/RSEL.50.1.2
  38. Menegatti, M., & Rubini, M. (2017). Gender bias and sexism in language. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.470
  39. Menegotto, A. (2020). Español 2G y español 3G: propiedades morfosintácticas y semánticas del lenguaje inclusivo [2G and 3G Spanish: morphosyntactic and semantic properties of inclusive language]. Cuarenta Naipes. Revista de Cultura y Literatura, 3, 207–232.
  40. Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. (2020). Best practice guidance for linear mixed--effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 112, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092
  41. Miranda, M. J. R. (2020). Português para todes? Um diálogo entre a análise de discurso crítica e a sociolingüística sobre linguagem não binária [Portuguese for everyone? A dialogue between critical discourse analysis and sociolinguistics on nonbinary language] [Bachelor’s tesis, Universidade de Brasília].
  42. Moura, J. R. F. (2021). Língua (gem) e gênero neutro: uma perspectiva discursiva no português brasileiro [Language and neutral gender: a discursive perspective on Brazilian Portuguese]. Línguas e Instrumentos Linguísticos, 24(47), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.20396/lil.v24i47.8660785
  43. Pabst, K., Cépeda, P., Kotek, H., & Syrett, K. (2018). Gender bias in linguistics textbooks: Has anything changed since Macaulay & Brice (1997)? [Conference presentation]. 92nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Salt Lake City.
  44. Palma, A. G., Arellano, N., Celi, M. A., Chimenti, M. de los Á., De los Ríos, M., & Stetie, N. A. (2024). Lenguaje inclusivo: vademécum lingüístico [Inclusive language: linguistic vademecum]. Revista CUHSO, 34(1), 709–750. https://doi.org/10.7770/cuhso-v34n1-art713
  45. Papadopoulos, B. (2021). The definitional dilemma of gender in language. Hesperia: Anuario de Filología Hispánica, 24(2), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.35869/hafh.v24i2.4106
  46. Pek, J., Pitt, M., & Wegener, D. T. (2024). Uncertainty limits the use of power analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(4), 1139–1151.
  47. Pesce, A., & Etchezahar, E. (2019). Actitudes y uso del lenguaje inclusivo según el género y la edad [Attitudes and use of inclusive language according to gender and age]. Búsqueda, 6(27), e742. https://doi.org/10.21892/01239813.472
  48. Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.08.010
  49. R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  50. Renström, E. A., Lindqvist, A., & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2022). The multiple meanings of the gender‐inclusive pronoun hen: Predicting attitudes and use. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2816
  51. Roca, I. M. (2006). La gramática y la biología en el género del español (2da parte) [Grammar and biology in Spanish gender (2nd part)]. Revista Española de Lingüística, 35(2), 397–492.
  52. Schad, D., Vasishth, S., Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2020). How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104038
  53. Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F. (2016). Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025
  54. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C. (2012). The electrophysiological underpinnings of processing gender stereotypes in language. PloS One, 7(12), e48712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048712
  55. Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Warren, P., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C. (2015). Gender stereotypes across the ages: On-line processing in school-age children, young and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01388
  56. Stetie, N. A., Martínez Rebolledo, C., & Zunino, G. M. (2023). Diversidad de género y variación lingüística en el español de América: procesamiento de estereotipos y morfología de género en Argentina y Chile [Gender diversity and linguistic variation in American Spanish: Processing gender stereotypes and morphology in Argentina and Chile]. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 31(2), 636–687. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.0.0.%25p
  57. Stetie, N. A., & Zunino, G. M. (2022). Non-binary language in Spanish? Comprehension of non-binary morphological forms: A psycholinguistic study. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.6144
  58. Stetie, N. A., & Zunino, G. M. (2023). Estereotipos y morfología de género en nombres de rol: un estudio psicolingüístico [Stereotypes and gender morphology in role names: A psycholinguistic study]. Lexis, 47(2), 678–716. https://doi.org/10.18800/lexis.202302.006
  59. Tibblin, J., van de Weijer, J., Granfeldt, J., & Gygax, P. (2022). There are more women in joggeur·euses than in joggeurs: On the effects of gender-fair forms on perceived gender ratios in French role nouns. Journal of French Language Studies, 33(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269522000217
  60. Vasishth, S., & Gelman, A. (2021). How to embrace variation and accept uncertainty in linguistic and psycholinguistic data analysis. Linguistics, 59(5), 1311–1342. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0051
  61. Venables, B. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th Edition). Springer. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4
  62. Vergoossen H. P., Pärnamets P., Renström, E. A., & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2020). Are new gender-neutral pronouns difficult to process in reading? The case of hen in Swedish. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 574356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574356
  63. Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
  64. Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., D’Agostino McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., Vaughan, D., Wilke, C., Woo, K., & Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. http://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
  65. Winter, B. (2019). Statistics for linguists: An introduction using R. Routledge.
  66. Xiao, H., Strickland, B., & Peperkamp, S. (2022). How fair is gender-fair language? Insights from gender ratio estimations in French. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 42(1), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221084643
  67. Zunino, G. M., & Dvoskin, G. (2023). Tirándole (de) la lengua a la ESI: con la lengua sí nos metemos [Challenging ESI: we’re not afraid to talk about it]. In J. Báez (Comp.), Lengua y Literatura en foco. ESI en la formación docente [Language and literature in focus: Comprehensive Sexual Education in teacher training] (pp. 91–126). Homo Sapiens Ediciones.
  68. Zunino, G. M., & Stetie, N. A. (2021). Procesamiento de formas no binarias en español rioplatense: relación entre el uso voluntario y la comprensión [Processing nonbinary forms in Rioplatense Spanish: relationship between voluntary use and comprehension]. Hesperia: Anuario de Filología Hispánica, 24(2), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.35869/hafh.v24i2.4115
  69. Zunino, G. M., & Stetie, N. A. (2022). Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: Differences dependent on the task. ALFA: Revista de Lingüística, 66, e14546. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-e14546
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2024-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 446 - 469
Published on: Sep 17, 2024
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Noelia Ayelén Stetie, Gabriela Mariel Zunino, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.