Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The psychological focus of white house press secretaries during scandal: A case study of the Obama and Trump administrations Cover

The psychological focus of white house press secretaries during scandal: A case study of the Obama and Trump administrations

Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. Bartoń, K. (2020). MuMIn (1.43.17).
  2. Baumgardner, P. (2013). Barack, Benghazi, and bungles: Tracing the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi Attacks. Cornell International Affairs Review, 6(2), 1–2.
  3. Bell, L. (2012, November 5). Regardless of who wins on tuesday, Benghazigate is not going away. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/larry-bell/2012/11/05/regardless-of-who-wins-on-tuesday-benghazigate-is-not-going-away/?sh=187fed6fd36c
  4. Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  5. Blackburn, K. G., Yilmaz, G., & Boyd, R. L. (2018). Food for thought: Exploring how people think and talk about food online. Appetite, 123, 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.022
  6. Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POBE.0000043456.87303.3a
  7. Boyd, R. L., Blackburn, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2020). The narrative arc: Revealing core narrative structures through text analysis. Science Advances, 6(32), eaba2196–eaba2196. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba2196
  8. Boyd, R. L., & Schwartz, H. A. (2021). Natural language analysis and the psychology of verbal behavior: The past, present, and future states of the field. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20967028
  9. Braun, M. T., Van Swol, L. M., & Vang, L. (2015). His lips are moving: Pinocchio effect and other lexical indicators of political deceptions. Discourse Processes, 52(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.942833
  10. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory, 6(3), 203–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x
  11. Chen, X., & Hu, J. (2019). Evolution of U.S. presidential discourse over 230 years: A psycholinguistic perspective. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), p28. https://doi.org/10.5539/IJEL.V9N4P28
  12. Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/40064028
  13. Department of Justice. (2017, May 17). Appointment of Special Counsel. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/appointment-special-counsel
  14. Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390247
  15. Dziuda, W., & Howell, W. G. (2021). Political scandal: A theory. American Journal of Political Science, 65(1), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12568
  16. Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2016). Presidential agenda-setting of traditional and nontraditional news media. Political Communication, 33(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.958261
  17. Galanes, P. (2016, May 6). Barack Obama and Bryan Cranston on the roles of a lifetime. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/fashion/barack-obama-bryan-cranston-table-for-three.html
  18. Garrard, J., & Newell, J. L. (2006). Scandals in past and contemporary politics. Manchester University Press.
  19. Hauch, V., Blandón-Gitlin, I., Masip, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2015). Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 307–342. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/1088868314556539
  20. Ireland, M. E., & Mehl, M. (2014). Natural language use as a marker of personality. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology. Oxford University Press.
  21. Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020386
  22. Johansson, E., & Johansson, K. M. (2022). Along the government–media frontier: Press secretaries offline/online. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1), e2759. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2759
  23. Jordan, K. N., Sterling, J., Pennebaker, J. W., & Boyd, R. L. (2019). Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(9), 3476–3481. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811987116
  24. Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13502654
  25. Klein, W. (2008). All the Presidents’ spokesmen: Spinning the news, White House press secretaries from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush. Praeger.
  26. Luke, T. J. (2019). Lessons from Pinocchio: Cues to deception may be highly exaggerated. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(4), 646–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619838258
  27. Maier, J. (2011). The impact of political scandals on political support: An experimental test of two theories. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110378056
  28. Markowitz, D. M. (2018). Academy Awards speeches reflect social status, cinematic roles, and winning expectations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(3), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17751012
  29. Markowitz, D. M. (2021). The meaning extraction method: An approach to evaluate content patterns from large-scale language data. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.588823
  30. Markowitz, D. M. (2022). Psychological trauma and emotional upheaval as revealed in academic writing: The case of COVID-19. Cognition and Emotion, 36(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2022602
  31. Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2016). Linguistic obfuscation in fraudulent science. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15614605
  32. Markowitz, D. M., & Hancock, J. T. (2019). Deception and language: The Contextual Organization of Language and Deception (COLD) framework. In T. Docan-Morgan (Ed.), The palgrave handbook of deceptive communication (pp. 193–212). Palgrave Mcmillan.
  33. Markowitz, D. M., Kouchaki, M., Hancock, J. T., & Gino, F. (2021). The deception spiral: Corporate obfuscation leads to perceptions of immorality and cheating behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20949594
  34. Markowitz, D. M., & Slovic, P. (2020). Communicating imperatives requires psychological closeness but creates psychological distance. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(5–6), 598–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20902816
  35. Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010
  36. Olson, J., Ouyang, Y., Poe, J., Trantham, A., & Waterman, R. W. (2012). The teleprompter presidency: Comparing Obama’s campaign and governing rhetoric. Social Science Quarterly, 93(5), 1402–1423. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6237.2012.00925.X
  37. Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Booth, R. J., Ashokkumar, A., & Francis, M. E. (2022). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC-22. Pennebaker Conglomerates. https://www.liwc.app
  38. Pfiffner, J. P. (1999). The contemporary presidency: Presidential lies. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(4), 903–917.
  39. Puglisi, R., & Snyder, J. M. (2011). Newspaper coverage of political scandals. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000569
  40. Seraj, S., Blackburn, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2021). Language left behind on social media exposes the emotional and cognitive costs of a romantic breakup. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2017154118–e2017154118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017154118
  41. Sonner, M. W., & Wilcox, C. (1999). Forgiving and forgetting: Public support for Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky scandal. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(3), 554–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/420644
  42. Spicer, S. (2017, January 21). Remarks to the press by Press Secretary Sean Spicer. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-press-press-secretary-sean-spicer
  43. Stockemer, D., & Praino, R. (2019). The good, the bad and the ugly: Do attractive politicians get a ‘break’ when they are involved in scandals? Political Behavior, 41(3), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9469-1
  44. Swire-Thompson, B., Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Berinsky, A. J. (2020). They might be a liar but they’re my liar: Source evaluation and the prevalence of misinformation. Political Psychology, 41(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12586
  45. The Moscow Project. (2021). Timeline—The Moscow Project. https://themoscowproject.org/collusion-timeline/index.html
  46. Turner, R. E., Edgley, C., & Olmstead, G. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 69–89.
  47. Woolley, J. T., & Peters, G. (2009). The American presidency project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/
  48. Xi, R., & Singh, M. P. (2023). The blame game: Understanding blame assignment in social media. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2023.3261242
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2024-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 59 - 76
Published on: Feb 10, 2024
Published by: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Maxwell Ely, David Matthew Markowitz, published by Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.