References
- Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, Newman TB. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. Getting ready to estimate sample size: Hypothesis and underlying principles In: Designing Clinical Research-An epidemiologic approach; pp. 51–63.
- Bacchetti P, Wolf LE, Segal MR and McCulloch CE. Ethics and sample size. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005;161(2):105-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi01410.1093/aje/kwi014
- Bonferroni CE. Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilit `a. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze. 1936;8:3-62.
- Miller, RG. Simultaneous statistical inference. 2nd ed. Springer Verlag. 1981, pp. 6-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8122-8
- Grimnes S and Martinsen ØG. Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics. 2nd edition. Academic Press. 2008.
- Bland JM and Bland DG. Statistics Notes: One and two sided tests of significance BMJ. 1994;309:248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6949.248
- Dowdy S, Wearden S and Chilko D. Statistics for research. 3rd Edition, Wiley-Interscience. 2011.
- Schmider E, Ziegler M, Danay E, Beyer L and Bühner M. Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology: Europ. J. Res. Meth. Behav. Social Sci. 2010;6:147-151.
- Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. CRC Press. 2011.
- Sawilowsky SS, Blair RC and Higgins JJ. An Investigation of the Type I Error and Power Properties of the Rank Transform Procedure in Factorial ANOVA. J. Educ. Stat. 1989;14:255-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/116501810.3102/10769986014003255
- Mariscuilo LA and Levin JR. Multivariate statistics in the social sciences: A researcher's guide. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co. (Monterey, California). 1983.
- Peres-Neto P, Jackson DA and Somers KM. How many principal components? Stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput. Stat. & Data Anal. 2005;49:974-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.01510.1016/j.csda.2004.06.015
- Ryan TP. Modern Regression Methods. 2nd ed. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley. 2008
- Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics (3. ed.). Pearson. New York. 1996.
- Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R and Stone C. Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, California: Wadsworth. Dowdy, Wearden, Chilko. Statistics for Research. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. 1984.
- Dreiseitl S and Ohno-Machado L. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2003;35:352-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00034-0
- Kotsiantis SB. Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques. Informatica. 2007;31:249-268.
- Rani P, Liu C, Sarkar N and Vanman E. An empirical study of machine learning techniques for affect recognition in human-robot interaction. Pattern Anal Applic. 2006;9:58-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10044-006-0025-y10.1007/s10044-006-0025-y
- JCGM 200:2012. International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) 3. ed.
- Buderer NM. Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1996;3(9):895-900.
- Malhotra RK and Indrayan A. A simple nomogram for sample size for estimating sensitivity and specificity of medical tests. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010;58:519-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.7169910.4103/0301-4738.7169920952837
- Bland JM and Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
- Zaki R, Bulgiba A, Ismail R and Ismail NA. Statistical Methods Used to Test for Agreement of Medical Instruments Measuring Continuous Variables in Method Comparison Studies: A Systematic Review. PLOS one. 2012;7:e37908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.003790810.1371/journal.pone.003790822662248
- Critchley LAH and Critchley JAJH. A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques. J. Clin. Monitor. Comput. 1999;15:85-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:100998261138610.1023/A:1009982611386
- Bland JM and Altman DG. A Note on the use of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient in the Evaluation of Agreement between two Methods of Measurement. Comput. Biol. Med. 1990;20:337-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F2257734
- Lin L. Overview of Agreement Statistics for Medical Devices. J. Biopharm. Stat. 2007;18:126-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1054340070166829010.1080/10543400701668290
- Arlot S and Celisse A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys. 2010;4:40-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-SS05410.1214/09-SS054
- Devroye Luc P and Wagner TJ. Distribution-Free performance Bounds for Potential Function Rules. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 1979;25:601-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1979.105608710.1109/TIT.1979.1056087
- Geisser S. The predictive sample reuse method with applications. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1975;60:320-328.
- De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL and Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J. Clin. Epidem. 2006;59:1033-1039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.01510.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015
- Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M and Streiner DL. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int. J. Nursing Studies 2011;48:661-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.01610.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016
- Barlett JW and Frost C. Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: Analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;31:466-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.525610.1002/uog.525618306169
- Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J. Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231-240.15705040
- Zaki R, Bulgiba A, Nordin N and Ismail NA. A systematic review of statistical methods used to test for reliability of medical instruments measuring continuous variables. Iranian J. Basic Med. Sci. 2013;16:803-807.
- Nunnaly JC and Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGrwaw-Hill. 1994.
- Lalkhen AG and McCluskey A. Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Contin. Educ. Anaesth. Crit. Care. Pain. 2008;8:221-223. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn04110.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn041
- ISO 5725-1:1994 Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results – Part 1: General principles and definitions
- Bland JM and Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1999;8:135-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/09622809967381927210.1177/09622802990080020410501650
- Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1978;8:283-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-210.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2112681