Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Improvement of wireless transmission system performance for EEG signals based on development of scalar quantization Cover

Improvement of wireless transmission system performance for EEG signals based on development of scalar quantization

Open Access
|Dec 2013

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Examples of captured EEG distribution.
Examples of captured EEG distribution.

Fig. 2

Simple model of the quantization process.
Simple model of the quantization process.

Fig. 3

Simple model of dequantization process.
Simple model of dequantization process.

Fig. 4

Position of electrode placements for bipolar EEG recording.
Position of electrode placements for bipolar EEG recording.

Fig. 5

Histograms of EEG samples captured by channel 1.
Histograms of EEG samples captured by channel 1.

Fig. 6

Histograms of EEG sample captured by channel 2.
Histograms of EEG sample captured by channel 2.

Fig. 7

Histograms of EEG sample captured by channel 3.
Histograms of EEG sample captured by channel 3.

Fig. 8

Histograms of EEG sample captured by channel 4.
Histograms of EEG sample captured by channel 4.

Fig. 9

Block diagram of the simulated transceiver.
Block diagram of the simulated transceiver.

Fig. 10

The achieved BER for received SNR in (-2dB, 2dB) intervals in different iterations.
The achieved BER for received SNR in (-2dB, 2dB) intervals in different iterations.

Fig. 11

The transmission range for λ = 1 meter.
The transmission range for λ = 1 meter.

The comparison among calculated MSQE of proposed methods and uniform quantizer_

Bits per sampleUniform Quantizer (MSQE)BGAI Quantizer MSQEBUAI Quantizer MSQE
5-104.29 dB-109.86 dB-118.64 dB
6-110.44 dB-118.26 dB-124.98 dB
7-116.61 dB-125.68 dB-131.14 dB
8-122.62 dB-131.69 dB-137.21 dB
9-128.65 dB-136.39 dB-143.28 dB
10-134.66 dB-142.84 dB-149.28 dB
11-140.72 dB-149.19 dB-155.24 dB
12-146.70 dB-155.67 dB-161.22 dB
13-152.76 dB-160.95 dB-167.27 dB
14-158.73 dB-166.65 dB-173.32 dB
15-164.78 dB-172.85 dB-179.37 dB
16-170.79 dB-185.00 dB-185.42 dB
17-176.80 dB-194.03 dB-191.47 dB
18-182.87 dB-200.19 dB-197.55 dB
19-188.90 dB-206.25 dB-203.49 dB
20-194.88 dB-212.12 dB-209.48 dB

The transmission range for different amount of λ_

Bits per sampleTransm. range λ = 0.33mTransm. range λ = 1 mTransm. range λ=2 mTransm. range λ=3 mTransm. range λ=4 m
50.95 m8.62 m34.48 m77.58 m137.92 m
61.98 m17.90 m71.6 m161.11 m286.4 m
74.04 m36.39 m145.56 m327.51 m582.24 m
88.15 m73.19 m292.76 m658.71 m1171.04 m
916.37 m147.40 m589.6 m1326.6 m2358.4 m
1031.31 m281.83 m1127.32 m2536.47 m4509.12 m

The comparison among calculated SNR of the proposed methods and a uniform quantizer_

Bits per sampleUniform Quantizer (SNR)BGAI Quantizer (SNR)BUAI Quantizer (SNR)
528.38 dB33.95 dB42.72 dB
634.52 dB42.34 dB49.06 dB
740.69 dB49.77 dB55.22 dB
846.70 dB55.77 dB61.29 dB
952.73 dB60.47 dB67.37 dB
1058.74 dB66.92 dB73.37 dB
1164.80 dB73.28 dB79.33 dB
1270.79 dB79.75 dB85.30 dB
1376.84 dB85.04 dB91.35 dB
1482.86 dB90.73 dB97.40 dB
1588.86 dB96.93 dB103.38 dB
1694.87 dB109.09 dB109.51dB
17100.88 dB118.11 dB115.56 dB
18106.95 dB124.27dB121.63 dB
19112.98 dB130.34 dB127.57 dB
20118.96 dB136.20 dB133.56 dB

The transmission range for λ = 1 meter_

Bits per sampleMinimum received SNRSNR of transmitted signalTransmission range for λ=1 m
52 dB42.72 dB8.62 m
62 dB49.06 dB17.90 m
72 dB55.22 dB36.39 m
82 dB61.29 dB73.19 m
92 dB67.37 dB147.40 m
102 dB73.37 dB281.83 m
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5617/jeb.437 | Journal eISSN: 1891-5469
Language: English
Page range: 62 - 72
Submitted on: Nov 19, 2012
Published on: Dec 28, 2013
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2013 Mohsen Habib Nezhad, Khazaimatol S. Subari, Mehran Yahyavi, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.