Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Generative AI Divide on X: Themes, Frames, and Discursive Shifts in High-Visibility Posts Cover

The Generative AI Divide on X: Themes, Frames, and Discursive Shifts in High-Visibility Posts

By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 330. 10.1257/jep.33.2.3
  2. Aristombayeva, M., Satybaldiyeva, R., Maung, B. M., & Lee, D. (2025). Guiding the uncharted: The emerging (and missing) policies on Generative AI in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10. 10.3389/feduc.2025.1644081
  3. Barry, I., & Stephenson, E. (2025). The Gendered, epistemic injustices of generative AI. Australian Feminist Studies, 40(123), 121. 10.1080/08164649.2025.2480927
  4. Beckman, K., Apps, T., Howard, S. K., Rogerson, C., Rogerson, A., & Tondeur, J. (2025). The GenAI divide among university students: A call for action. The Internet and Higher Education, 101036. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101036
  5. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Mitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21) (pp. 610623). 10.1145/3442188.3445922
  6. Birhane, A. (2021). Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns, 2(2), 100205. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205
  7. Bozkurt, A. (2024). Why generative AI literacy, why now and why it matters in the educational landscape? Kings, queens and GenAI dragons. Open Praxis, 16(3), 283290. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.3.739
  8. Bozkurt, A. (2025). AI’s thirst, AI’s heat, AI’s waste: Exposing the hidden environmental impact of every artificial intelligence interaction. Open Praxis, 17(4), 638647. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.4.1058
  9. Bucher, T. (2018). If…Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
  10. Cefa, B., Macgilchrist, F., ElGamal, H., Bai, J. Y. H., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Loglo, F. S. (2025). Responses to the initial hype: ChatGPT supporting teaching, learning, and scholarship? Open Praxis, 17(2), 227250. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.872
  11. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503609754
  12. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. 10.12987/9780300252392
  13. Daepp, M. I., & Counts, S. (2025). The emerging generative artificial intelligence divide in the United States. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 19, pp. 443456). 10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35825
  14. DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying internet use as penetration increases. Working Paper No. 47. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pri:cpanda:15.
  15. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 5158. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  16. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. 10.4324/9781315834368
  17. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689707. 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
  18. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
  19. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). 10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
  20. Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403426. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01416.x
  21. Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
  22. Kay, J., Kasirzadeh, A., & Mohamed, S. (2024). Epistemic injustice in generative AI. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 684697). 10.1609/aies.v7i1.31671
  23. Kergroach, S., & Héritier, J. (2025). Emerging divides in the transition to artificial intelligence (OECD Regional Development Papers No. 147). OECD Publishing. 10.1787/7376c776-en
  24. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). SAGE. 10.4135/9781071878781
  25. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). 10.1177/2053951716679679
  26. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. In Algorithms of Oppression. New York University Press.
  27. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164887
  28. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE. 10.4135/9781529682571
  29. Serpil, H., & Kesim, E. (2024). Understanding the application of AI in higher education systems: Global perspectives from a local AI ecosystem. Open Praxis, 16(4), 645662. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.725
  30. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
  31. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137437037
  32. van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. SAGE. 10.4135/9781452229812
  33. van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466485). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
  34. van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91112. 10.1177/1750481307071986
  35. van Wyk, M. M., Adarkwah, M. A., & Amponsah, S. (2023). Why all the hype about ChatGPT? Academics’ views of a chat-based conversational learning strategy at an open distance e-learning institution. Open Praxis, 15(3), 214225. 10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.563
  36. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001
  37. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Language: English
Page range: 462 - 480
Submitted on: Apr 15, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 14, 2026
Published on: Aug 4, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Sezan Sezgin, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.