Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From One-Size Texts to Tailored Readings: Student Experiences with AI-Generated Course Materials Cover

From One-Size Texts to Tailored Readings: Student Experiences with AI-Generated Course Materials

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 416. 10.3102/0013189X013006004
  2. Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative AI, synthetic contents, open educational resources (OER), and open educational practices (OEP): A new front in the openness landscape. Open Praxis, 15(3), 178184. 10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579
  3. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron, J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., Crompton, H., Koutropoulos, A., Terentev, E., Pazurek, A., Nichols, M., Sidorkin, A. M., Costello, E., Watson, S., Mulligan, D., Honeychurch, S., … Asino, T. I. (2024). The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: A critical collective stance to better navigate the future. Open Praxis, 16(4), 487513. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777
  4. College Board. (2025). Trends in college pricing and student aid 2025. College Board.
  5. Connor, C. M. D., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B. J., Schatschneider, C., & Underwood, P. (2016). Individualizing student instruction in reading: Implications for policy and practice. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 5461. 10.1177/2372732215624931
  6. Corbitt, K., Hiltbrand, K., Coursen, M., Rodning, S., Smith, W. B., & Mulvaney, D. (2024). Credibility judgments in higher education: A mixed-methods approach to detecting misinformation from university instructors. Education Sciences, 14(8), 852. 10.3390/educsci14080852
  7. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Sage.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
  9. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Irvington.
  10. Faber, T. J. E., Dankbaar, M. E. W., van den Broek, W. W., Bruinink, L. J., Hogeveen, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2024). Effects of adaptive scaffolding on performance, cognitive load and engagement in game-based learning: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 24, 943. 10.1186/s12909-024-05698-3
  11. Fan, L., Deng, K., & Liu, F. (2025). Educational impacts of generative artificial intelligence on learning and performance of engineering students in China. Scientific Reports, 15, 26521. 10.1038/s41598-025-06930-w
  12. Florida Virtual Campus. (2022). 2022 student textbook and instructional materials survey: Results and findings (Office of Distance Learning & Student Services). Tallahassee, FL.
  13. Freeman, R. B. (1984). Longitudinal analyses of the effects of trade unions. Journal of labor Economics, 2(1), 126. 10.1086/298021
  14. Hernández-Herrera, J. R., Ortiz-Bejar, J., & Ortiz-Bejar, J. (2026). Adaptive and personalized learning in higher education: An artificial intelligence-based approach. Education Sciences, 16(1), 109. 10.3390/educsci16010109
  15. Hogheim, S., & Reber, R. (2015). Supporting interest of middle school students in mathematics through context personalization and example choice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 1725. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.006
  16. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  17. National Association of College Stores. (2025, August 20). NACS Student Watch Report: Course materials spending stable, high satisfaction with access programs.
  18. Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). Making learning personally meaningful: A new framework for relevance research. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 1129. 10.1080/00220973.2017.1380589
  19. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  20. Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2014). Motivating students by “personalizing” learning around individual interests: A consideration of theory, design, and implementation issues. 10.1108/S0749-742320140000018004
  21. Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13, 14016. 10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5
Language: English
Page range: 506 - 522
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 10, 2026
Published on: Aug 4, 2026
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Alexander M. Sidorkin, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.