Table 1
Pre- and Post-Test Performance by Grade Level.
| GRADE | N | PRE-TEST MEAN (SD) | POST-TEST MEAN (SD) | EFFECT SIZE (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 64 | 13.84 (3.49) | 16.98 (3.05) | 1.31 |
| 8 | 66 | 15.52 (3.42) | 18.68 (3.54) | 1.39 |
| 9 | 79 | 16.27 (3.34) | 19.22 (2.33) | 1.31 |
| 10 | 88 | 11.91 (2.94) | 13.53 (3.90) | 0.50 |
| 11 | 165 | 16.14 (4.69) | 18.71 (4.62) | 0.80 |
| 12 | 262 | 16.77 (3.83) | 18.87 (4.16) | 0.57 |
[i] p-value = < .001.
Table 2
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test Results – Grade 7–12 Students’ Perceptions of OER.
| SURVEY STATEMENT | Gr. 7 | Gr. 8 | Gr. 9 | Gr. 10 | Gr. 11 | Gr. 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. I enjoy learning in an environment that incorporates OER | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| 2. I would describe using OERs as interesting resources | 0.48 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.87 |
| 3. OERs helped me to improve my retention for this course | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.28 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.93 |
| 4. I can intelligently critique the OER used in this course | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| 5. OERs offer advantages in my course | 0.41 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.90 |
| 6. OER makes me feel more engaged with my learning | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.53 |
| 7. Prefer to use OER over traditional textbooks | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.62 |
| 8. OER directly improves the quality of my learning | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.70 |
| 9. OER matches textbook content | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.62 |
| 10. OER helps me understand topics better than textbooks | 0.20 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.94 | 0.76 |
| 11. OERs contribute to a better understanding of this course | – | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.69 |
| 12. OERs are easy to use | – | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.81 |
| 13. OERs are convenient for learning and studying | – | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.37 |
| 14. I can easily adapt to using the OERs | – | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
[i] Notes: A dash (–) means the item was not statistically significant for that grade level or data was not reported.
Effect sizes: 0.2–0.49 = Small; 0.5–0.79 = Medium; 0.8+ = Large; 1.0 = Very large.
